luckily the court was there to force him to pay for all those luxuries for his child AND ex wife. its not like those are the perks for living with him, they're entitled to that money right?
luckily the court was there to force him to pay for all those luxuries for his child AND ex wife. its not like those are the perks for living with him, they're entitled to that money right?
She's some kind of stock broker and made $700k herself last year.
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok
ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?
The fact that "The Rock" earns enough to pay $22K a month is what is sad.
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?
As for The Rock and his wife, they are still very close and she still handles a lot of his financial interests and investments, and they are still in business together on a few different ventures. So what, her pays around $250,000 in child support? You think he is sweating that one bit, when he probably paid every bit that much when he was still married?
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok
ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?
You have entire families living on food stamps and some living on millions a year. WTF does that have to do with anything?
If $22K a month is what a court/judge/the parents agreed to, then obviously that's 1. what the dude can afford and 2. what will keep the child in the same style they would be living in if the parents stayed married. That's how it's been working for years - even when my parents got divorced 35 years ago.
I'm sure if he disagreed with the amount he has a legal team to take care of it who might be a little more familiar with his financial situation than posters here
You have entire families living on food stamps and some living on millions a year. WTF does that have to do with anything?
because 22k/month is excessive.
If $22K a month is what a court/judge/the parents agreed to, then obviously that's 1. what the dude can afford and 2. what will keep the child in the same style they would be living in if the parents stayed married. That's how it's been working for years - even when my parents got divorced 35 years ago.
what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?
I'm sure if he disagreed with the amount he has a legal team to take care of it who might be a little more familiar with his financial situation than posters here
who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?
edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?
Not me.
1. He's a dreadful actor.
2. He was barely a tolerable "wrestler".
It's sad that you missed the entire point of my commentary.
Do you honestly think I begrudge him the money he currently has and all his future earnings? I don't. I just think he's a no talent hack, who isn't worthy of MY money. The more of YOUR money he has the better. Feel free to enrich him all you want - after all he's a "rising Hollywood movie star".
The money goes into a fund for the child to pay for her education... and the wife made 700k last year on her own. Just a couple things I read on this story.
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?
As for The Rock and his wife, they are still very close and she still handles a lot of his financial interests and investments, and they are still in business together on a few different ventures. So what, her pays around $250,000 in child support? You think he is sweating that one bit, when he probably paid every bit that much when he was still married?
That's sad that they broke up. I remember reading an interview with them on a plane when his star first started rising and thinking their relationship sounded really cool. If they are still friends and business partners, though, it doesn't seem likely that he objects to pampering his kid.
I would have a different opinion if there were an acrimonious split and he did not want to pay it. Fucking someone a few times should not entitle a woman to live in whatever style the man can afford.
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
It's as easy as hiring an illegal immigrant nanny for $8 an hour.
You lazy ass bitch's down south just make it look hard.
what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?
who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?
edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?
It has been that way for years now. Child support is based on a sliding scale, and every state has child support guidelines. It amazes me how many people separate from a person they have a child with and think that their child should suddenly downgrade their lifestyle that they were previously raised in. If your friend’s story is true he is entitled to a modification. If his circumstances have changed there is no need for him to keep paying based on what he made when the support order was entered. BTW your girlfirend isn't entitled to anything it is your kids that are entitled to your support.
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok
ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?
The kid is entitled to the same life style it enjoyed when the Rock was with the mom.
If you don't like, don't get married and don't have kids.
It has been that way for years now. Child support is based on a sliding scale, and every state has child support guidelines. It amazes me how many people separate from a person they have a child with and think that their child should suddenly downgrade their lifestyle that they were previously raised in.
There a lot of women who fuck famous guys and never have any kind of relationship with them who already have kids with other men and lived a normal or lowclass lifestyle. She and her kids NEVER were accustom to a "rich" lifestyle. So why should they get tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of child support per month because one kid is from a famous guy? Most of that support isn't really going to that kid anyways.
BTW your girlfirend isn't entitled to anything it is your kids that are entitled to your support.
And yet it's the ex-wife or girlfriend that tends to get the most benefit not the kids. My best friends has his kids for the summer. Yet he is still required to pay his ex child support durring the next 2 months. Um WHY? She as always will spend this money on her and her new hubby. Shouldn't my friend be able to keep that money so he can support the children which is what CHILD SUPPORT is SUPPOSED to be for?
what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?
who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?
edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?
you do realize that his kids suffer negatitive impacts on their lives because they are his kids.
How many photographers are camped out side your house invading your privacy. Imagine what your teenage years if photographers were following you around too.
That child support pays for private schools, security etc things that counter act the detriments of "the Rocks" public lifestyle.
If we lived it a world where you could snap your fingers and the photojournist disappeared that level of support would not be needed.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
Fuck that
A stay at home mom that is taking care if his kid, sure... but if she makes $700k a year? Hell no. He should demand receipts and make sure every damn cent he gives her was spent on his kid.
That's sad that they broke up. I remember reading an interview with them on a plane when his star first started rising and thinking their relationship sounded really cool. If they are still friends and business partners, though, it doesn't seem likely that he objects to pampering his kid.
I would have a different opinion if there were an acrimonious split and he did not want to pay it. Fucking someone a few times should not entitle a woman to live in whatever style the man can afford.
I went to UM the same time he did (I was a year behind him) and we were both sports management minors, so we took several of the same classes. We were never really close but we were friends, and I still have a close friend back in South Florida that is very close with Dany, his soon to be ex wife. I never really got any info on why they are splitting, but she is several years older than him (she was graduating UM when he was an incoming freshman) and people just change over the years. I do know he trusts her immensely to still handle all of his financial affairs...
It has been that way for years now. Child support is based on a sliding scale, and every state has child support guidelines. It amazes me how many people separate from a person they have a child with and think that their child should suddenly downgrade their lifestyle that they were previously raised in. If your friend?s story is true he is entitled to a modification. If his circumstances have changed there is no need for him to keep paying based on what he made when the support order was entered. BTW your girlfirend isn't entitled to anything it is your kids that are entitled to your support.
first off, if they modify his order wouldnt that affect the childs lifestyle? sounds like you want it both ways. second, i was one signed document away from paying alimony to an ex WIFE making her entitlement retroactive. btw, i hope you realize that if the rock married a single mother and raised HER kid for a couple years before they split, that child would now be "entitled" to the same support HIS child is getting. is that reasonable too?
It's fun to theorize, when it doesn't effect you... The guy is pretty wealthy so his situation is a pretty bad example, but what usually happens ex-wife takes your house, half your savings, etc... you basically end up on the street, financially getting set back probably 10 years... then on top of that you have to pay good chunk of your income for the next 20 years... so basically you are fucked for the rest of your life, all while the ex-wife has 3 income sources: hers, yours + some pimp's she finds 3 months after the divorce, living like quite well for the rest of her life...
Hey socks you still didnt answer me...are you black or something? I really wonder since you went all nuts over the word ape. I mean there must be something right why you cried like a little baby when i use the word ape. Are you black and look like an ape maybe? Is that it?
It's fun to theorize, when it doesn't effect you... The guy is pretty wealthy so his situation is a pretty bad example, but what usually happens ex-wife takes your house, half your savings, etc... you basically end up on the street, financially getting set back probably 10 years... then on top of that you have to pay good chunk of your income for the next 20 years... so basically you are fucked for the rest of your life, all while the ex-wife has 3 income sources: hers, yours + some pimp's she finds 3 months after the divorce, living like quite well for the rest of her life...
That's why you always take Mr Burns' advice from The Simpsons and have all your assets in the name "Canary M. Burns".
Comment