http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart_2006.gif

ADG

Did I say that Iraqs want the US to remain? No I didn't.. Of course they don't.. They want their independence now that they've been given the chance.

Where's your facts to prove my statement wrong that the vast majority of Irqais aren't fighting the US over there? Gee. I suspect you don't have any since they're not.

Don't put words in my mouth since you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about... Canadians aren't in Iraq.. We refused to go... Just as I don't support Bush going in there and think he should be ... well let's just say "war crimes".... but the topic was how history will view what's happened and unlike you, I'm able to look at the topic objectively regardless of how I feel about what's happened..

Oh good.. blow more hot air out your ass.. A sign that you can't actually debate my facts... I've never watched 1 minute of Fox news...

Democracy can suck my fucking cock. 51% of the people telling the other 49% what they can and cannot do is about the furthest thing from Freedom I can think of.

Actually, I lied.. I have seen some Fox news.. usually clips on youtube that show just how fucked up those mouthpieces are.

I agree directfiesta here. Some retards will never learn, unless someone else from another country actually "liberates" them in the same way US did .. just because their shit (democracy, liberty, values etc.) isn't right and according to the definition of that country.

Yep.. I agree with you...

You make a statement, it is up to you to back it up ....

I understand that mentally challenged like you have the new dogma of proving a negative like when you invaded Iraq ... You guys never had a single proof of WMD, but wanted Saddam to prove he didn't have any...

Proving a negative is not logical and possible.

:2 cents:

Don't bother responding.. You clearly didn't even read my post and only picked out what you wanted to... Seriously.. You clearly showed with this post that you're the one that's mentally challenged and that you lack any reading comprehension.

can't you post a single backup to all your theory ... you are the one that made claims of ... democracy and so on .... without anything to support it aside from the foul odor from your rectum...

I made the claim the Iraqis want you out ( in fact they wanted you gone by now ) and backed it up ...

What is next... You will claim that the Polish wanted the Nazis to liberate them in 1939 ????

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The majority of those fighting the US are Sunni's... Depending on what stats you read, the Sunni's make up 20-30% of the Iraq population. Thus, my statment that the majority of Iraq isn't fighting the US is true.. Try and get your little brain around that.

Yep Iran had a democratically elected leader back in the 50s. He wouldn't play ball with the US so they set up a coup and put in the shah which has led to all the problems we have with Iran today.

Pity the fool that has so much spare time on their hands to debate whether there will ever be peace in the Middle East in the foreseeable future.

Get a life.

Life's too short to partake in such meaningless drivel.

I'll answer this question just off the thread title. I do hate Bush. But I also think it just so happened that just as we got an idiot into Presidency is when we actually needed a President. I was in the Army with an infant son when Bush threatened to take me away from him. I hated him for that...I think he can't handle himself in an intense situation and tried to ride the coat tails of those who talked the big talk but never had to walk the walk. (which was okay before when no big theats like 9/11 happened where people expected revenge) I think he thought he could ride out his 4-8 years without any more trouble than the first 6 months vacation he took while in office, but then something big fell in his lap. I think he's an idiot. I think he makes it easier for any Democrat to fill his spot. But I also think he is an easy scape-goat for anyone in politics to get mad at. He's one of those people I do dislike, but feel pity for

uh huh.. You guys sure love to try and spin shit when you can't debate your point.. No where was it ever said "foreseeable future"... It was how history would view Bush... Short term history (couple decades) isn't real "history".. I went out of my way to say it would take a very long time and pointed out how a century after the US revolution, they had their civil war... These things take many decades and many generations to work themselves out... So Bush's legacy won't be truly known for a very long time...