Do you trust the Bush administration?

[BFT3K]

Here is a nice article for you...

http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=6432

[F-U-Jimmy]

NO ! do you ?

[directfiesta]

sure do ... to be liars ...

Just Between Us

Telecoms and the Bush administration talked about how to keep their surveillance program under wraps.
Apr 30, 2008 | Updated: 6:09 p.m. ET Apr 30, 2008

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

Not just no, but HELL NO!!!

Dubya = Worst President ever...



ADG

[ADL Colin]

Here is a nice article for you...

http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=6432

I'm willing to bet Bush is sick of being president at this point.

[TheSenator]

Worst President Ever!

FUCK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[GetSCORECash]

NO !

Wait... NO

give me a minute NO

just a few more NO

These guys have a seven more months to get more Legal action on the books prior to the next president takeing office. Even if it's crap, they want to get it in, and blame the next president, McCain included for being an idiot and being soft on porn.

[AbulletAway]

Hell yes I love him, best president ever!


Just kidding. I don't trust him at all. Liked him better when he was a coke head.

[Kudles]

Umm... I think he's kinda a douche

[Spyce]

Ummmmmmm..no

[Martin]

About as far as I can pick up Dick Cheney's fat ass and throw him.

[StuBradley]

Not just no, but HELL NO!!!

I concur.

[D Ghost]

Fuck no!

[AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Can not say I ever trusted the government however I am for killing Islamics.

So as long as that keeps on he has my thumbs up.

McCaine seems to have the right idea about this as well so I am voting for McCaine.
The more Islamic Nutjobs die the better.

[directfiesta]

Wait... NO

give me a minute NO

just a few more NO

These guys have a seven more months to get more Legal action on the books prior to the next president takeing office. Even if it's crap, they want to get it in, and blame the next president, McCain included for being an idiot and being soft on porn.

[mikeyddddd]

Do you trust the Bush administration?

[gadabout]

Hell No!

[aico]

I'm willing to bet Bush is sick of being president at this point.

Ya, doing whatever you want and getting away with it because everyone is too fucking "busy" to care, would make anyone sick.... not.

[dav3]

Is this a trick question of some sorts?

[Japanese Schoolgirl]

High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror

BFT3K, I hope you realistically expect about
half of GFYer's to read that, and then further,
that only half who read it will understand it...

High-Level Officials Warn of Fake Terror

Source: George Washington's Blog

A variety of current and former high-level officials have recently warned that the Bush administration is attempting to instill a dictatorship in

America, and will itself carry out a fake terrorist attack in order to obtain one.

Background

FBI agents, Time Magazine, Keith Olbermannand The Washington Postand Rolling Stone have all stated that the administration has issued terror

alerts based on scant intelligence in order to rally people around the flag when the administration was suffering in the polls. This implies ? as an

initial matter only ? that the administration will play fast and loose with the facts in order to instill fear for political purposes

More to the point, a former prominent republican congressman stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the Bush

administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a

military form of government".

Current U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated, the government "is determined to have martial law", and that the government is hoping to get the

people "fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse"

And Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said "if there is another terror attack, "I believe the president will get what he

wants", which will include a dictatorship.

Terror on U.S. Citizens by American Government?

But would the government actually kills its own people to instill sufficient fear so that it can get what it wants? Read what the following very smart

people are saying, and then judge for yourself:

A retired 27-year CIA analyst who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents,

stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the

masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them

to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to "play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even events themselves in

order to rally people behind the flag

..... ....... .........

--------------------------


Most crucial now are Presidential Directive #51, Executive Orders #13303, #13315, #13350, #13364, #13422, #13438, and more, by which

Bush has granted himself an immense arsenal of powers for which the term ?dictatorial? is a modest understatement.

..........

It?s well established that Richard Nixon?mentor to Karl Rove and Dick Cheney?commissioned the Huston Plan, which detailed how to cancel

the 1972 election.

Today we must ask: who would stop this administration from taking dictatorial power in the instance of a ?national emergency? such as a terror

attack at a nuclear power plant or something similar?

Nothing in the behavior of this Congress indicates that it is capable of significant resistance. Impeachment seems beyond it. Nor does it seem

Congress would actually remove Bush if it did put him on trial.

Short of that, Bush clearly does not view anything Congress might do as a meaningful impediment. After all, how many divisions does the

Congress command?

The Supreme Court, as currently constituted, would almost certainly rubber stamp a Bush coup. If not, like Jackson, he could ignore it as easily as

he would ignore Congress.

What does that leave? There is much idle speculation now about what the armed forces would do. We also hear loose talk about ?90 million gun

owners.?

From the public side, the only conceivable counter-force might be a national strike or an effective long-term campaign of general

non-cooperation.

But we can certainly assume the mainstream media will give lock-step support to whatever the regime says and does. It?s also a given that those

likely to lead the resistance will immediately land in those new prisons being built by Halliburton et. al.

So how do we cope with the harsh realities of such a Bush/Cheney/Rove dictatorial coup?

=========================

Will Bush Cancel The 2008 Election?

It is time to think about the ?unthinkable.?

The Bush Administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election.

Let?s presume the unthinkable occurs. What would happen if there was a ?terrorist attack? upon the United States, prompting the president to

declare a state of ?national emergency?, and taking control of the National Guards of the States, and activating the military detainment camps that

have been prepared?

Would you fight, flee, or fester?

If you would fight against the imposition of totalitarian rule in this country, how would you do so?

If you would flee, where would you go?

If you would fester, how would you cope?

(Originally published September 2007, courtesy of Global Research)
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6477

The GOP strategy for another electoral theft in 2008 has taken clear shape, though we must assume there is much more we don?t know.

But we must also assume that if it appears to Team Bush/Cheney/Rove that the GOP will lose the 2008 election anyway (as it lost in Ohio 2006)

we cannot ignore the possibility that they would simply cancel the election. Those who think this crew will quietly walk away from power are simply

not paying attention.

The real question is not how or when they might do it. It?s how, realistically, we can stop them.

==============================

[Japanese Schoolgirl]

==============================

Will Bush Cancel The 2008 Election?

The Bush Administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election.

The GOP strategy for another electoral theft in 2008 has taken clear shape. Those who think this crew will quietly walk away from power are

simply not paying attention. The real question is not how or when they might do it. It’s how, realistically, we can stop them.

For 2008 we expect the list of vote theft maneuvers to escalate. We are already witnessing a coordinated nationwide drive to destroy voter

registration organizations and to disenfranchise millions of minority, poor and young voters. This carefully choreographed campaign is

complemented by the widespread use of electronic voting machines. They were integral to stealing both the 2000 and 2004 elections.

Overall, the GOP will have at its command even more weapons of election theft in 2008 than it did in Ohio 2004. Expect everything that was used

these past two presidential elections to surface again in 2008 in far more states, with far more efficiency, and many new dirty tricks added in.

What’s also clear is that this administration has a deep, profound and uncompromised contempt for democracy, for the rule of law, and for the US

Constitution. When George W. Bush went on the record (twice) as saying he has nothing against dictatorship, as long as he can be dictator, it

was a clear and present policy statement.

Who really believes this crew will walk quietly away from power? They have the motivation, the money and the method for doing away with the

electoral process altogether. The groundwork for dismissal of both the legislative and judicial branch has been carefully laid. Bush clearly does

not view anything Congress might do as a meaningful impediment. The Supreme Court, as currently constituted, would almost certainly rubber

stamp a Bush coup.

======================

http://outraged.chattablogs.com/archives/066113.html

http://cplmcl.newsvine.com/_news/200...-2008-election

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/46289


================================

[Japanese Schoolgirl]

================================

THE MOTHER OF ALL DECEPTIONS

http://www.the-tribulation-network.c...deceptions.htm

Will We Fix Our Elections as Well? – THE INCIDENT WILL!


The religious right finally came to their own in sharing political power in 2000 when George Bush was elected President. We have seen some of the results of that marriage the past seven years as the administration claimed to be advancing family values, education through “no child left behind,” faith-based initiatives and a “just war” to depose a horrible dictator and bring democracy in the Middle East. Instead we have seen an administration that has progressively grabbed power, trampled on human rights, incited Muslims, created a hot bed of Islamic fundamentalism, taken advantaged of soldiers—leaving their families to fend for themselves—cut health care and education, while the rich grow fabulously richer and the middle class slips into poverty and underemployment.


The general public has been cowed into accepting onerous and illogical travel restrictions, surveillance, search and seizure and restricted speech in the name of fighting terrorism. The specter of 9/11 hangs over the country as we wait for the other terrorist shoe to drop.


We are probably the most media saturated people in the history of the world and the least informed. How quickly we bought the lie that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and that Iraq was the seat of Al-Qaeda and the major cause of 9/11 – spurious lies perpetrated by the Bush Administration.


We are bringing democracy to Iraq while our constitutional government is being shredded by a record number of laws and “signing statements” stripping us of our basic rights. Over 200 signing statements have been made where, for example, Bush signs the law but says he disagrees with it and has no intention of enforcing it. In other words, executive power trumps legislative power – a claim made by the Caesars of Rome who said that only they represented ALL the people.

A recent article asked the unthinkable question. Will the Bush administration cancel the 2008 election? I’m not a conspiracy nut, but there certainly are questions about how the 2000 election came down with Gore winning the popular vote and losing the election. And again in 2004, there were many questions about voter fraud, voting machine accuracy, etc. in closely contested states such as Ohio. Laws have been passed that give the president dictatorial powers in the case of an emergency.


“Most crucial now are Presidential Directive #51, Executive Orders #13303, #13315, #13350, #13364, #13422, #13438, and more, by which Bush has granted himself an immense arsenal of powers for which the term “dictatorial” is a modest understatement…


Today we must ask: Who would stop this administration from taking dictatorial power in the instance of a “national emergency” such as a terror attack at a nuclear power plant or something similar?


Nothing in the behavior of this Congress indicates that it is capable of significant resistance. Impeachment seems beyond it. Nor does it seem Congress would actually remove Bush if it did put him on trial.

Short of that, Bush clearly does not view anything Congress might do as a meaningful impediment. After all, how many divisions does the Congress command?


The Supreme Court, as currently constituted, would almost certainly rubber stamp a Bush coup. If not, like Jackson, he could ignore it as easily as he would ignore Congress.” (Global Research, August 7, 2007)


Even more frightening is the interview with General Tommy Franks, the general who led the Iraq invasion in 2003.


“Gen. Tommy Franks (Commander of Coalition Forces during the invasion of Iraq in 2003) said in an interview with the lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States ‘The Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.’ The stunning revelation is the headline story on the right-wing news site NewsMax for Friday. Franks said that another terrorism attack will result in ‘... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we’ve seen for a couple of hundred years...’ He indicated that if another terrorism attack occurs Bush will likely declare martial law and the Constitution will apparently be ‘discarded’’” (By Rob, Tommy Franks Says Bush May Discard Constitution If Another Terrorist Attack Occurs, Daily Kos, November 21, 2003).


Friends, this was not some ideologue from the left or the right. This comes from the four star general that led the Iraqi invasion! So, if the only thing standing between martial law and constitutional government is such an incident, then what is the likelihood that something will happen? I know this is an uncomfortable subject for many of you. The idea that the government could lie to us, scheme against us or perpetrate something against its citizens is unbelievable. We reject the thought out of hand. Anyone who would say such a thing is a conspiracy nut, a kook.


I don’t like the idea of entertaining these thoughts any more than you. I served this country as a Captain in the Army during the Vietnam era. I want to believe the best, just like you. However, I would remind you that our government had knowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor before it happened and did nothing to protect its citizens. The Gulf of Tonkin crisis which got us into the Vietnam War was a trumped up lie. There are many other examples. Let’s just say that governments have not always been honest.


The end of the Cold War left America without a mission; without an enemy. What were we going to do with our army, navy, air force, missile defense systems, etc. without an enemy? How were we going to project American power around the earth to protect American interests (especially commercial interests)? In 1997, the Joint Chiefs described a role for the military that would have “full spectrum dominance” in the 21st Century. But as the second Bush administration came in, they were disheartened at how long it would take to bring about the needed transformation, they wrote prior to 9/11 that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pear Harbor.” (Emphasis mine, PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, p. 51)


So was there a catastrophic, catalyzing event that allowed the administration to set aside the Constitution and seize power with the assistance and blessing of Congress? If it were a transformative moment, the American public would rally around the administration and the military. Congressional resistance would become a race to see how much authority they could give the administration. Measures that would have been resisted for years would be passed in weeks in the form supreme Patriot Act.


The Bush Doctrine of a preemptive—preventive war was sold to the nation and all because of 9/11.

[Japanese Schoolgirl]

But wait, you may say, what about the 9/11 Commission? Hasn’t this been studied and questioned sufficiently? If you ask the right questions,

you get the right answers. If you ask the wrong questions, you will never get the right answers.


The Commission was headed by Phillip Zelikow, an insider member of the Bush Administration. The assumption was made that 19 Middle

Eastern hijackers brought the planes down. No other evidence or theories were examined. I realize that there are conspiracy theorists and

websites out there that make all kinds of accusations but because of the tremendous volume of information out there, especially on the internet, I

am going to restrict my comments to the findings presented by David Ray Griffin in his book, Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 (2006 by

Westminister John Knox Press).


Griffin’s initial response was to believe the official story but was later otherwise convinced by an abundance of evidence. His book is very well

footnoted and I encourage you to get a copy in order to see the tremendous amount of research that went into it. If you are open-minded and

carefully examine the evidence, I think you will see that it would be difficult to come to any other conclusion. There are many aspects to the 9/11

situation; so, in the interest of time, I am just going to deal with one aspect – the way the towers fell.


If you are interested in other aspects, I encourage you to research the situation for yourself. If I can cast doubt over the towers collapse, that

should cast doubt over the entire event. Think outside the box. Also, if this were a planned event, wouldn’t you expect any other view to be met

with ridicule? Wouldn’t you expect there to be a cover-up if the true facts were different than the official story?

...............

If the current administration was so desperate that it hijacked the 2000 election, and was at least complicit in one form or another in 9/11

(probably a small part of it); and it had a not-so-hidden agenda of constructing an oil/gas pipeline through Afghanistan (and after 6 years, we

seem to be losing rather than gaining ground in this War on Terror); likewise, it lied about Al-Qaeda and weapons of mass destruction to get us

into a war in Iraq; it possibly stole the 2004 election – although we’ll never know – then what makes you think “something” is not planned for the

2008 election?


There were numerous allegations of voting irregularities, which showed contempt for the Constitution and called that document but dung, and

thereby systematically dismantled the Bill of Rights and laid the groundwork for martial law; and, furthermore, this Administration has been so

secretive about virtually everything and continues to stonewall in not allowing its staff to testify before Congress under the veil of “executive

privilege.”


This blatant contempt for Congress, amplified by Bush’s signing statements,
lends further credibility to the notion that his administration was complicit (to some extent) in the 9/11 attack.


Yes, frankly, this is the same administration who thinks it not robbery to rob from the poor, from needy children and veterans to enrich the rich!


Would not that same administration, threatened with defeat, threatened with the unraveling of its policies and the loss of its position in the Middle

East, not to mention the threat to its business cronies if they are denied access to tons of oil and ipso facto the loss of empire and influence, do

all it could to maintain the "economic status quo?"


Would not this same administration cancel the election if another 9/11 type event were to occur? If this man who doesn’t care what polls say, no

matter how unpopular he is, no matter what people, world leaders, the UN, the Democrats or even the Republicans think—then can you really trust

what he will do in the next election year of 2008?


For whatever reason, he seems hell bent on staying in Iraq, taking on Iran and anyone else he thinks is threatening America. He seems to really

believe he is called to do this and nothing will stop him. The idea of losing all that he has so carefully crafted in nearly seven years can be his for

life if there is another 9/11 type event. One big “I told you so!” And, why not—all the legislation is in place to declare martial law,

cancel elections and thereby provide peace and safety for an anxious population.


The Department of Homeland Security recently carried out a full-scale exercise to prepare for martial law defending America from

terrorism.


“The President has the power to seize property, organize and control the means of production, seize commodities, assign military forces

abroad, call reserve forces amounting to 2 1/2 million men to duty, institute martial law, seize and control all means of transportation, regulate all

private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all Americans...” (Bush makes power grab, Jerome

Corse, WorldNetDaily, May 23, 2007).


Good grief, FEMA has already contracted with Halliburton to build detention camps around the country! (See Doug’s article:

Peace and Prosperity as Destruction and Corruption.)


The Pentagon is laying plans for actions within America’s borders. The growth and consolidation of federal powers in the hands of the

executive branch has grown at an exponential rate during the last few years. Recent legislation, Presidential directives, and pronouncements,

directly from the Bush and Cheney gang, form a blueprint for the establishment of martial law and the suspension of the U.S. Constitution. These

powers are being amassed with the justification that they are necessary preparation for a ‘national emergency’. (Towards Dictatorship in

America) – (Or see the article titled Martial Law in America – If terrorists strike U.S. Cities with nuclear weapons, our nation will never be the

same. Borders will close, detention camps will open, and America will be a thing of the past.)


Another 9/11 event will also cover up the miserable state of the economy, the banking system and all the bubbles percolating around the world. It

will give an excuse for the problems in the economy. Terrorism provides an exuse and justification for just about any government action

imaginable. There is little doubt that inflation caused by the uncontrolled creation of paper currency, asset bubbles (the stock market, housing,

commodities), the banking crisis caused by poor lending practices, unbridled debt and consumption – the effect of all of these things will be

masked by a major attack. People and legislators have shown that they are more than willing to give up freedom for security. The government

has shown that it is willing and able to blame the war on terror for just about anything, including their own failures in manipulating the economy.

Only a major attack on America will deflect the blame of the coming Depression

[payd2purv]

No and I also don't trust our next president Clinton...

I am scared guys Hold me.

[Japanese Schoolgirl]

Conclusion


It is with some trepidation frankly that Doug and I continue to speak out on prophecy. You don’t have to be a genius to understand what the last days are all about: Israel (Jerusalem—a cup of trembling to the nations); the nations surrounding Israel; a great military and commercial power that will sign a defense pact with Israel (probably America); and, the Antichrist (ruler of Babylon/America – it so happens to be the same person right now). It is also no accident that a third to a half of our hits come from around the world from countries like Iran, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Turkey, etc. What part of Jihad don’t we understand?


http://oranchak.com/crackbaby/Outdoo...n-Flag.jpgWhat happened the Sunday after 9/11? The churches filled up with scared people. American flags were passed out in many of them. Unfortunately, another event will evoke the same response. The knee jerk reaction of Christians will be to lock step behind their leader for several reasons:


· He is viewed as one of them – an evangelical Christian

· He supports the nation of Israel (at least in word)

· He views radical Islam as terrorist and the avowed enemy of both Israel and America.

· Both the President and many Christians have a sense of America’s destiny as “God’s Redeemer Nation” to the world – a beacon of light – a city set on a hill – a cup of blessing


What does all this amount to? . . . An unbroken and firm alliance between the apostate Church and the militant State. I may be wrong, but I don’t see elections in 2008. First, it would weaken the church/state alliance of Revelation 17. Christians will assume that because the President is for Israel that he is “their man.” Second, if the administration has been so willing to go to all the trouble to get into and stay in power thus far, I can’t imagine him relinquishing it so easily. One more major terrorist event is all it will take to end life as we know it and propel America on a prophetic path declared thousands of years ago. Are we about to witness THE MOTHER OF ALL DECEPTIONS?

Alas! The convergence of economic, political and religious subterfuge is upon us . . .



===========================================


Conspiracy Too Monstrous To Conceive
http://www.savethemales.ca/000166.html

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/911_a_hoax.htm



Conspiracy Too Monstrous To Conceive Cognitive Dissonance
http://www.rense.com/general38/mak_st.htm



The Truth Seeker - Conspiracy Too Monstrous To Conceive
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=837



Will Bush Cancel The 2008 Election?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=n_HOBiTb6jI&feature=related



Bush Confession - What they don't want you to see
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OyRvqajrAj4&feature=related



Laura Schwartz: Bush May Cancel 2008 Elections!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=IqV22jU6_Vo&feature=related



Bush / Cheney to Attempt Possible Coup
http://youtube.com/watch?v=K3dAnSMzUlo&feature=related

[justbangher]

LET ME THINK...... NO

[LiveDose]

I don't trust any politicians. They are all the same...