I'm with you, she set me up and I'm like 1:59! I'm suing! lol:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

This thread slays me. I generally have had terrible experiences with female account reps. Most are completely and totally incompetent and do absolutely nothing for me but say "I'll check on that and let you know." If this thread were about any other female account rep I would probably believe it.

I've read numerous posts from Kristin and have been impressed as hell that she not only understands how websites work but is also competent when it comes to converting traffic. I signed up with Yappo because I spotted a rep who knew her ass from a hole in the ground. Usually only fat guys have the kind of knowledge and ability that Kristin has.

Fluffy, you're an incompetent twit. You fucked up. It's obvious. Take responsibility for it. Apologize to Kristin and the rest of GFY for making us read your idiotic drivel and let's all be friends again.

Nicely put.

stupid dike. please kill yourself.

The invoice part was hilarious ... :) Can't you just people hug and kiss and work together again? :)

Side note, can I invoice affiliates for sending unbillable traffic and wasting bandwidth? What about requesting special content, a special template, a few hours on icq and then they send 4 hits/2 uniques and one of those is my ip checking the links for them.

Any more bros want to shit all over themselves by jumping in w/o reading first ?

Silly bitch, I read every single word. All I got was that you can't follow directions and are incompetent. Why not hire someone to take care of these complicated and confusing webmaster matters for you?

I don't recall being friends with you to begin with.

Other than that, I'm the guy that found the linkex hole, as far as you know. What other holes I might've found, you have no idea about.

No, actually, you do.

I found a hole in Kristin's linking RIGHT OFF THE BAT. Which she actually admits to.

So, what have you done?

No, actually. Who are you ? Incompetent boosh.

Why are you soooooooo stupid?

I told you before, and I'll tell you again... Unless you grow a brain and clue-in, don't speak unless you have a cock in your mouth. Cunt.

Cunt whore no-talents should been seen, and not heard.

fiddy plus two

minus one retard

I don't see what's to keep you. Well, groupthink, maybe.

Ohhh inovoice´s... great idea!
Let me collect some money and write some stupid ass emails hhaahhah!!! Invoice for my traffic hahahahaha hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you do when someone jips you machete ?

Ha-ha-ha! What a dumb cunt! Invoice for traffic! How about I invoice you for my time. Fucking n00b.

Fluffy: You need to stop. No one takes you seriously.

So nice you could join us. How's the imaginary google checks coming along?

I read your post, I've read lots of your posts. You are an obnoxious, ignorant attention-whore of the worst kind.

It is fucking hilarious that you have the gall to send an invoice - who the fuck do you think you are? The reality is - the sponsor programs are the boss when it comes down to it - they invest the money to make the products, they license the content, they send you the payouts, they do all the work to provide someone like you with a way to make money from your sorry-assed design and programming skills and limited business knowledge.. and then you get all high and mighty, sending an invoice?? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh wake the fuck up - you said it your self, there are lots of VOD programs out there. Kristin tried to help you and you go and post this thread (like the annoying attention-whore verging on board troll that you are) - personally, I would fire you as an affiliate and tell you to take a hike, because the program would be just fine without you.

shut your YAPPO ! :1orglaugh

wow. it took two pages for someone to hit on that. :winkwink:

all real, bitch. Want to bet some money on it? I'll show you one for this month, brainless jealous cunt.

Wow this is better than the one thread of hers where she called out some tgp for not approving her traffic trade!

Surprised she didnt send them an invoice too! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

:Oh crap

:1orglaugh

:Oh crap

:321GFY

Okay, since you tend to either not post anything, or else make sense as a general rule, I'll go through your post.

A party to a contract. I exchange a commodity for a consideration.

This rationalle could be just as well used to justify any sort of shaving, traffic leaking, late or absent checks, anything really. Do you stand behind all that ? Where do you draw the line ?

Nobody has unlimited knowledge, business or otherwise. However, the programs do not do anything for the purpose of providing me with a way to make money. They do it for the purpose of providing THEMSELVES with a way to make money.

You may think sponsors are doing affiliates a favour, but then again, you may be living in 1980.

Again. If I run into an incompetent chick trying to run a program and smoke a cigar, odds are I'll try and help her. As I have in this case. Twice.

However, when the same incompetent chick crosses the fine thin line between incompetence and theft, I stop helping her, and instead I show her the door. An invoice is a pretty elegant way to do that.

No, actually, without me, to this day the "program" would still be sending wrong links to affiliates on their WL confirm email.

your sig image is messed up :2 cents:

The program is not sending wrong links to any affiliates, and never has. You need to stop posting lies, slander, and bashing a program with no proof.

You agree the their terms, not the other way around. I guarantee you there is no contractural mechanism for you to send an invoice. If you think there has been some breach of contract, lawyers are abundant.

Again, you agree to the terms of the program - and the terms are explicit. The sponsor program tells you how it is, you have no say - all you do is check the "I agree" box.

Is that like stupid affiliate 101 - when you have nothing of substance to say you just start throwing around the words "shaving", "traffic leak" and "late payments".

The relationship, however, is asymmertrical - you NEED a sponsor but the sponsor doesn't need YOU - it just needs affiliates. There are tens of thousands of affiliates but only a relative handful of sponsor programs, it's real easy to say to a few bad apples "Ya, I don't think this is gonna work out...". You are going to run out of sponsor programs before the program runs out of potential affiliates :2 cents:

See above.

Sticks and stones. Just because you keep saying the word 'theft' doesn't mean you have a valid point.

The proof is sitting in my inbox.

Well then, post it.

Certainly more abundant than people who will man up and cover the milk they spilled. I find this to be an excellent way to sepparate the sound from the posing-as-sound.

If lawyers are so abundant, one might perhaps be found to explain to you why what you say is actually wrong. I have the say, in that by agreeing to their offer, THEY are bound to it just as much as I am.

You have not answered the question. Your reasoning could be used to justify absolutely anything, do you stand behind it or do you see why you're wrong ?

I need a sponsor and the sponsor needs some affiliates. I don't need them specifically any more than they need me specifically.

Your argument again can be used to prove anything and everything, for instance that house owners have a say in rent levels, since people need a house but owners do not need a tenant. Review your M Friedman for the counterproof.

Thank you for the concern, I'm doing fine. Mostly because I stick with the ones that are solid and ditch the rest.

Are you set to 4-bit color?

I will if Kristin actually denies it. So far there seems to be no cause.

This is that it says

this page/domain banned b/c porn, warex, or topsite..ect

She did deny it, by stating what happened. You wrote "This link does not track clicks. We have updated the system so that clicks are counted, but this would be the URL to use. [gives me new url] I apologize, I need to get the email that gets sent out the webmasters updated."

This 100% does not say you got the wrong link in the email. It says you got the default link in the email, which is not an error. The "newly" created system by nats that you are now able to use simply hasn't been added into the emails. This again, is not an error.

You simply do not understand the technical aspects of this and based that on that confusion you are spewing lies and miss information.

http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg
http://www.upyoursbitch.com/post/cockinyomouth.jpg

imageshack.us ?

yeah if i view the image away from gfy, it shows up ok..