Nats Programs and Google (SEO) (*stats) - GoFuckYourself.com

Jdoughs · 03-13-2008, 08:12 PM

Do any of you programs running the NATS system have someone inhouse that sets up the sites so they are se friendly?
Do you hire someone?
Or do you do nothing?

With the newer versions of Nats i see a dramatic increase in search traffic by programs using the system. I know some have takin some pointers as far as effective page layout to welcome the spider and feed it, and some have actual employees that look after it. (whether that is successful or not is left unsaid)

Do program owners think of things like this? Having your NATS running so that it encourages the spider can only pay dividends in the future. If you dont, what is the reasoning behind not having it done? And if you have, do you care to tell us the benefits?

For those who lol and say, what a seo post, and whats it have to do with NATS. Here is a couple screenies of 4 Nats programs and referer stats. There is one thing they all have in common (asside from google traffic), is Nats. If someone with a clue spent some time on them and had them set up properly, the results would be very good for us affiliates, and the sponsor (obviously).

Also, with the newer version of NATS, im seeing LESS sponsor paysite roots getting bumped from the serps by referal codes, instead they share the serps, thanks to the great subdomain and the big g's look at them.

Anyways, maybe some discussion can go on about this.

Jdoughs · 03-13-2008, 11:49 PM

Bueller? Bueller?

BUELLER?!

SomeCreep · 03-13-2008, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoughs

Bueller? Bueller?

BUELLER?!

Whats google? You mean googoo? That's baby noise.

TMM_John · 03-13-2008, 11:59 PM

You didn't hear about our deal with Google?

Jdoughs · 03-14-2008, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

You didn't hear about our deal with Google?

Nope

TMM_John · 03-14-2008, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoughs

Nope

I'm kidding of course. I've had people tell me our link code structure is great for SEO, I've had people tell me its horrible. I have seen more say it is good tho than bad.

datatank · 03-14-2008, 12:11 AM

This thread is useless without traffic numbers

Nats link codes do ok with the SEO but could be alot better without the redirect thingies

Jdoughs · 03-14-2008, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PBucksJohn

I'm kidding of course. I've had people tell me our link code structure is great for SEO, I've had people tell me its horrible. I have seen more say it is good tho than bad.

It is the best one out there, if you base that on whats available. Some programs i see are running it almost bone stock, and those ones, i can see why people may say its 'less then good".

There is a few very basic tweaks i see alot of sponsors have used but not everyone does. Its simple shit, like addressing the most basic of seo principles. And searching the sites in google and giving them a solid look at its very evident which sponsors tried, and which didnt.

I guess im just curious in why not. One of those sponsors from above is doing extremely well, another very bad, but had there not been some simple things done to the pages upon generation (simple temp editing and database calls for stuff like modelname or scene id) none would be easily ranked like im seeing.

Jdoughs · 03-14-2008, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datatank

This thread is useless without traffic numbers

Nats link codes do ok with the SEO but could be alot better without the redirect thingies

Traffic is not involved in the questions posed above in anyway. And if it needed to be broke down that simple to be understood, i wouldnt use traffic to justify. It would be money earned.

But the thread is about the search engine friendliness of NATS and why most don't take advantage of it.

datatank · 03-14-2008, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoughs

Traffic is not involved in the questions posed above in anyway. And if it needed to be broke down that simple to be understood, i wouldnt use traffic to justify. It would be money earned.

But the thread is about the search engine friendliness of NATS and why most don't take advantage of it.

My point is I dont give a shit if you got 1 click for some term from google. If you are getting 100 a day then great nats should look at what is and what is not working in the linking structure

TMM_John · 03-14-2008, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datatank

My point is I dont give a shit if you got 1 click for some term from google. If you are getting 100 a day then great nats should look at what is and what is not working in the linking structure

If you have any suggestions please feel free to get in touch. Always happy to discuss ideas.

Jdoughs · 03-14-2008, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by datatank

My point is I dont give a shit if you got 1 click for some term from google. If you are getting 100 a day then great nats should look at what is and what is not working in the linking structure

Congrats on completely missing the point on the thread

xsabn · 03-14-2008, 02:52 AM

Code:

/track/MTAyOjI6MQ/

- this is not SEO..

03-13-2008, 08:12 PM	#1
Jdoughs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Great White North Posts: 5,794	*Nats Programs and Google (SEO) (stats) Do any of you programs running the NATS system have someone inhouse that sets up the sites so they are se friendly? Do you hire someone? Or do you do nothing? With the newer versions of Nats i see a dramatic increase in search traffic by programs using the system. I know some have takin some pointers as far as effective page layout to welcome the spider and feed it, and some have actual employees that look after it. (whether that is successful or not is left unsaid) Do program owners think of things like this? Having your NATS running so that it encourages the spider can only pay dividends in the future. If you dont, what is the reasoning behind not having it done? And if you have, do you care to tell us the benefits? For those who lol and say, what a seo post, and whats it have to do with NATS. Here is a couple screenies of 4 Nats programs and referer stats. There is one thing they all have in common (asside from google traffic), is Nats. If someone with a clue spent some time on them and had them set up properly, the results would be very good for us affiliates, and the sponsor (obviously). Also, with the newer version of NATS, im seeing LESS sponsor paysite roots getting bumped from the serps by referal codes, instead they share the serps, thanks to the great subdomain and the big g's look at them. Anyways, maybe some discussion can go on about this. __________________ LinkSpun** - Premier Adult Link Trading Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250 Be Seen By New Webmasters/Affiliates * Target out webmasters/affiliates based on niches your sites are for less than $20 a month. AmeriNOC - Proudly hosted @ AmeriNOC!

03-13-2008, 11:49 PM	#2
Jdoughs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Great White North Posts: 5,794	Bueller? Bueller? BUELLER?! __________________ LinkSpun - Premier Adult Link Trading Community - ICQ - 464/\281/\250 Be Seen By New Webmasters/Affiliates * Target out webmasters/affiliates based on niches your sites are for less than $20 a month. AmeriNOC - Proudly hosted @ AmeriNOC!

03-13-2008, 11:59 PM	#4
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,660	You didn't hear about our deal with Google? __________________ Skype: JohnA1078 Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

03-14-2008, 02:52 AM	#13
xsabn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: 203-069-778 Posts: 2,815	Code: /track/MTAyOjI6MQ/ - this is not SEO..

03-14-2008, 12:11 AM	#7
datatank Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: My dog is blacker than Tupac Posts: 5,471	This thread is useless without traffic numbers Nats link codes do ok with the SEO but could be alot better without the redirect thingies