GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Where do you draw the line between pedophile and.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=804585)

Linguist 02-02-2008 04:18 AM

Morals are imposed by government as laws. USA is not the holy grail of what is right and what's not.

In Canada age of consent is 14. That's right. A 14 year old can make a decision to have sex with a 40 year old.
http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/dept/clp/faq.html

So .. Canadian lawmakers are pedos? And once again according to whom? The USA has been known for babying its kids. 21 years old to drink? For fucks sake. I think 19 to drink in Canada is too high, it should be 16 like in European countries. Even though kids start drinking at 14 anyway.

Paul Markham 02-02-2008 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730572)
i appreciate your honesty, but the law is the law... in the US it is illegal to have sex with a minor... are you saying that sex with a minor is ok?

So the law here is 15, does it make it right for me to go after 15 year olds?

IMO no, 15 year olds are not to be preyed on by 50 year olds. Other 15 year olds is fine.

The problem with the law on sex is it's an guessing game. As we reach puberty our bodies change in many ways, not just pubic hair but glands inside us produce chemicals that make us want to have sex. Do you make someone a criminal for doing what nature intended?

Adults who prey on younger people are after far more than sex. As the person they prey on gets younger it gets more about control than sex.

Guys who get turned on driving pass a 6th formers are remembering their first sexual experiences and arousals. A totally different thing. What you have to prove is the sites catering for them stimulate the desire or provide a release valve. Sexual crimes have usually dropped as more porn becomes available.

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 13730606)
To me a pedo is someone who wants and is attracted to kids who have yet to hit puberty and much younger. Typically a pedo is moving on from the 12 year old to the younger 4 year old where he started at with the first kid.

They are not interested in teenagers with lollypops and pigtails holding teddy bears. That is just catering to the barely legal crowd which is far from what a pedo seeks.

That kinda says it better than me.

And even though I shoot teens my thing is girls in stockings and suspenders, 25 year olds who will seduce me. Teens, unless they are very naughty and sure of themselves. Look at my work and you see few scared teens. That is what Pedos want, someone to dominate.

Dirty Dane 02-02-2008 04:54 AM

Underage is a legal term. Pedo is a medical term.

There is difference. I think WHO defines pedophilism as attraction to prepuberty.

Rest is morality.

BVF 02-02-2008 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730614)
i see your poiont, but i have to disagree... the legal consent age in the US is 18...

You don't know what you're talking about...The average age of consent in the united states is 16...If you don't believe me, google it.

Davy 02-02-2008 06:39 AM

Let the processing companies decide that.

BVF 02-02-2008 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 13730790)
So the law here is 15, does it make it right for me to go after 15 year olds?

IMO no, 15 year olds are not to be preyed on by 50 year olds. Other 15 year olds is fine.

Yet it's perfectly ok for a 50 year old to prey on a girl only three years older at 18?

um hummmmmmmmmmm.

kmanrox 02-02-2008 06:41 AM

i think CP should be legalized.. shrug

BVF 02-02-2008 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730756)

i have no problem with a 16 y/o having sex with a 16-18 y/o boyfriend, what i have an issue with is an 18 y/o girl doing hardcore sex or even a solo site when the producer is 21 + y/o...

So if the producer is 19 years old and sells the content that will be seen by a bunch of horny 50 year olds, it's okay?

Damn some of you people in here are slow.

hateman 02-02-2008 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox (Post 13730953)
i think CP should be legalized.. shrug

Is that why you reside in 3rd world countries? So you can have sex with little kids?

BVF 02-02-2008 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730749)
then where do you set the bar?

i am not saying that adhering to the law is wrong, but what i am saying is that the adult industry as a whole should take the higher road...

having models that clearly look underage and having them pose with stuffed animals and pigtails, etc, gives a bad name to adult and needs to be addressed...

i get the feeling that people in the "teen' market are more interested in making money that doing what the normal person would seem as the right thing to do...

that is my point and i will continue to fight for the industry to do the "right thing'....

You're an idiot...

Stuffing two black dicks into a 21 year old's ass and ejaculating into her will not make the adult industry look any better to outsiders just because you waited until she was 21 to do it...

Your argument is invalid and your 'fight' will go nowhere.

pornguy 02-02-2008 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hateman (Post 13730679)

IM going to laugh my ass off the day it comes out that this joker is nailing under age boys.

Fletch XXX 02-02-2008 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox (Post 13730953)
i think CP should be legalized.. shrug

wow kman, i know you had left the industry, what a comback. :thumbsup

mrwilson 02-02-2008 07:29 AM

The girls quoted below are in my opinion far, far to young looking.
For some one to be turned on by them i personally find it disturbing.
To me, they look no older then 9 or 10 and i am sure i am not the only one who thinks this.

But then, is it a good thing that girls as young looking as this are legally available online?
I'm guessing they have entertained alot of peadophiles and saved a few innocent little girls from being raped.

:2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730686)

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730690)

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730695)


kmanrox 02-02-2008 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hateman (Post 13730960)
Is that why you reside in 3rd world countries? So you can have sex with little kids?

no, that's just a perk it turns out

what do u think about that?

Zango 02-02-2008 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?

You are a fucking retard.

If she is 18, she is 18. End of fucking story. Just because YOU think about little girls who look underage, doesn't mean the rest of the world does. Some guys just like teens and the FANTASY of young girls.

There is a HUGE fucking difference between TEEN and PRE-TEEN girls. If she is made to look like a TEEN, so be it and kudos for them. However, I will side with you if she is made to look like a PRE-TEEN, but I have not seen any 18 year old girls looking age 11 as of late.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730572)
i appreciate your honesty, but the law is the law... in the US it is illegal to have sex with a minor... are you saying that sex with a minor is ok?

In the USA it is illegal, therefor for everyone else on earth it should be illegal?

Non Americans can abide by the law of the place they reside, and whatever the age is there, I'm fucking it. Law is the law. If the law is 16, I'm banging out 16. If it's 18, I'm banging out 18.

Physically speaking, when a women has her period, she is ready to breed.

Many countries have girls marry as young as 13. You going to tell THEM that THEY are wrong simply because you were raised in a country that says so?

Bottom line... NONE of us can say what is right or wrong for anyone so long as she / he is not a true pre-teen child, and we abide by the local laws.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730631)
the harm is facilitating or encouraging sex or sexual fantasies with minors...

where do we draw the line?

sex with a minor in the US will get you jail time and a label as a sex offender..

if the govt sets the bar at 18 y/o... and under that age is illegal, then the law is clear and concise..

i have no issue with that..

what i do have an issue with, is sites that cleary try to incinuate that their models are under 18...

to be frank, no 18 y/o should or would have an interest in stuffed animals or child like surroundings in a photo shoot...

i have a real prob;lem with producers or site owners trying to profit in behaviour that they know caters to pedophiles or parties interested in underage sex...

Spoken like a true American.

You ever been through Asia and South America? LOTS of grown women sleep with teddy bears. Japanese women try to look like young girls every day, even act like them during sex. Teddy bears, dress, pigtails, all of it.

With all due respect, get your head out of your American ass for a minute and realize that there is sexuality outside of what your country says is sexuality.

There is TEEN and there is PRE-TEEN. Huge difference. I agree with ASM, real pedos don't care about teddy bears or lolipops, they care about true children and the fact that they are children. Not that they "look" like they are in high school. They like the bodies on kids. They like the innocence. It is a sickness and that sickness is FAR from a guy who wacks off looking at a girl who is really 18 but looks to be 16. End of story.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730732)
thats what i am talking about... you "find them sick using your own morals and ethics"...

this is not a free speech issue or legal issue, this is more about doing the right thing....

somehthing the adult world seems to care little about.....

if a model is 18, she's 18, but why would you market a girl just because she looks underage?

whether we like it or not, this is going on everyday and persoanlly i disagree with it.....

legal or not, i think anyone can see what the overall goal is and target audience...

Coming from a guy who has "I am 1 finger away from getting my whole hand up your mom's asshole!" in his profile. Good guy to lecture on morals. Which I have none of by the way.

You have no idea about doing the right thing. You are in the wrong business if you want to do the "right thing." Go sell bibles or something. This is the wrong line of work for you. :2 cents:

cykoe6 02-02-2008 09:22 AM

It is real fucking simple. If the girl is 18 and there is a legitimate 2257 then there should be no problem. :disgust

halfpint 02-02-2008 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwilson (Post 13731013)
The girls quoted below are in my opinion far, far to young looking.


I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-02-2008 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 13731320)
I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:


if I were to take a wild out of this world guess I would say..

because they convert

because they are hot

because I would love to impregnate them

I dont know... those are just shots in the dark... I might be missing the mark

pinkbits 02-02-2008 12:00 PM

2257 proves they are 18 + so what is the problem ?

some chicks that 18 look 16 who gives a fuck she isnt pushed to do a photo shoot or hardcore scene

Twisted Dave 02-02-2008 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730614)
i see your poiont, but i have to disagree... the legal consent age in the US is 18... any site that tries to portray girls that are under that age (18) are imho just trying to entice the pedo crowd...

i could name several sites and site owners, but i won't...

i am merely staing my own personal opinion and soliciting other opinions...

Am I a pedophile because I have fucked a 17 year old ? I was 27 at the time ... and she was fucking good :) And she knew what she was doing ... plenty of times.

Fact is ... age of consent here in the UK is 16, and I'm fine with that ... tho I wont fuck a 16 year old ... I'll not fuck anyone younger than 17. But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US, a lot of people here say if they see a girl 17 years old being fucked, it's child porn. I think that's fucking obscene and completely stupid.

I think the age for shooting topless shots of girls in the UK used to be 16. Now ... while I don't need to see it ... and don't care (I'm not that into the whole 'teen' niche either because they're all portraid the same way, that glossy pink 'young' look... which doesn't interest me) .... but ... what I am getting at is that why is a girl allowed to fuck 5 guys ... 10 guys ... 100 guys in a room on her own and have a great time doing it, at the age of 16 here in the UK, yet she's 'child porn' if it's filmed?

I think the laws are all fucking over the place and they probably need some looking at :)

I think the age of consent is gonna be raised in the UK btw, to 18 ... not sure when or for sure ... but I think that's the case.

GotGauge 02-02-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banthis (Post 13730715)
You sure about those numbers? Ive always been told 18 and im from NY..

And military personnel 17? That doesnt make sense considering you cant enlist until 18...

I joind the Army at 17, Yes my parents had to sign for me. I went to basic training at 17, and turned 18 in the Army, then Shipped off to War!

minddust 02-02-2008 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed

Fuck jail time for that kind of scumbag. They should be hanged high.:2 cents:
I have ZERO tolerance about such thing. Zero.

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-02-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minddust (Post 13731757)
Fuck jail time for that kind of scumbag. They should be hanged high.:2 cents:
I have ZERO tolerance about such thing. Zero.

then statistics show you are most likely in fact a true pedophile -- fact

people who are so strongly against something or anothe most ofter are the ones who commit and or support it

you sound like a pedo

SteveLightspeed 02-02-2008 12:22 PM

Take the test

http://www.extremefunnyhumor.com/animation.php?id=69

mrwilson 02-02-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 13731320)
I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:

Because they convert well.

V_RocKs 02-02-2008 12:49 PM

I have a teen mailing list...

I put out a post on Kates Playground and I got 3 responses back asking me to stop sending MILF in the teen niche posts...

lol

V_RocKs 02-02-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwilson (Post 13731798)
Because they convert well.

You can look for work, but not with that sig.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

Zango 02-02-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 13731796)

http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quizimages/jailbait4.jpg

just a punk 02-02-2008 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 13730981)
IM going to laugh my ass off the day it comes out that this joker is nailing under age boys.

Everything is possible: http://xbiz.com/news/2402 - just read this.

Zango 02-02-2008 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunchBunny Dave (Post 13731738)
Am I a pedophile because I have fucked a 17 year old ? I was 27 at the time ... and she was fucking good :) And she knew what she was doing ... plenty of times.

Fact is ... age of consent here in the UK is 16, and I'm fine with that ... tho I wont fuck a 16 year old ... I'll not fuck anyone younger than 17. But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US, a lot of people here say if they see a girl 17 years old being fucked, it's child porn. I think that's fucking obscene and completely stupid.

I think the age for shooting topless shots of girls in the UK used to be 16. Now ... while I don't need to see it ... and don't care (I'm not that into the whole 'teen' niche either because they're all portraid the same way, that glossy pink 'young' look... which doesn't interest me) .... but ... what I am getting at is that why is a girl allowed to fuck 5 guys ... 10 guys ... 100 guys in a room on her own and have a great time doing it, at the age of 16 here in the UK, yet she's 'child porn' if it's filmed?

I think the laws are all fucking over the place and they probably need some looking at :)

I think the age of consent is gonna be raised in the UK btw, to 18 ... not sure when or for sure ... but I think that's the case.

In parts of Asia it's as low as 14 and 15 for Asian men. Not foreigners. For them it bumps up to 18. lol

Fletch XXX 02-02-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunchBunny Dave (Post 13731738)
But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US,

there is no universal age of consent for the United States, and its not 18 - some are as low as 14

http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

it differs state to state

BlackCrayon 02-02-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?

I guess if your girlfriend is 24 but looks 16 you're a pedo...give me a break.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?



I think you're a Communist.

Thanks for asking.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730572)
i appreciate your honesty, but the law is the law... in the US it is illegal to have sex with a minor...


Really?

Me thinks you may want to have a more thorough grasp of US laws before you make such a general and incorrect statement.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730631)
...to be frank, no 18 y/o should or would have an interest in stuffed animals or child like surroundings in a photo shoot....


You're one dumb and ignorant fuck...And as usual, DEAD fucking wrong.

I had to remove stuffed animals from Lupe's bedroom. She had WAY too many of them and Visa would never have approved the site.

You're misinformed OPINION is clouding the truth.

I'm not going to bother reading any more of this thread. It's crossed the ignorant line and heading down hill at a fast rate.

Fuck you and your misinformed opinions. :321GFY

GatorB 02-02-2008 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom (Post 13730588)
Age of consent in most States is 16 I seem to recall as it is in most Western European countries

Not exactly in most states where age of consent is 16 it only applies to certain male adults. A 40 year old can not fuck a 16 year old in most states even if the age of consent is 16.

For example in my state an adult male can legally fuck a 16 years old as long as he not more than 4 years( 48 months ) older than her. So if she's 16 years and 4 months as long as he's 20 and 4 months it's legal. 20 years and months he goes to jail. So legally in my state no males over 21 can fuck a minor girl unless she's married to him. I haven't seen a case in my state where some dude has been prosecuted for fucking a 17 year old even if he was much older. I guess they figure she'll be 18 soon and can fuck whoever wants anyways.

pornask 02-02-2008 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13731891)
I have a teen mailing list...

I put out a post on Kates Playground and I got 3 responses back asking me to stop sending MILF in the teen niche posts...

lol

LOL, that's funny :1orglaugh

She looks like an overused hooker to me too, though :helpme


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123