GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Where do you draw the line between pedophile and.... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=804585)

pornguy 02-02-2008 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hateman (Post 13730679)

IM going to laugh my ass off the day it comes out that this joker is nailing under age boys.

Fletch XXX 02-02-2008 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox (Post 13730953)
i think CP should be legalized.. shrug

wow kman, i know you had left the industry, what a comback. :thumbsup

mrwilson 02-02-2008 07:29 AM

The girls quoted below are in my opinion far, far to young looking.
For some one to be turned on by them i personally find it disturbing.
To me, they look no older then 9 or 10 and i am sure i am not the only one who thinks this.

But then, is it a good thing that girls as young looking as this are legally available online?
I'm guessing they have entertained alot of peadophiles and saved a few innocent little girls from being raped.

:2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730686)

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730690)

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13730695)


kmanrox 02-02-2008 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hateman (Post 13730960)
Is that why you reside in 3rd world countries? So you can have sex with little kids?

no, that's just a perk it turns out

what do u think about that?

Zango 02-02-2008 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?

You are a fucking retard.

If she is 18, she is 18. End of fucking story. Just because YOU think about little girls who look underage, doesn't mean the rest of the world does. Some guys just like teens and the FANTASY of young girls.

There is a HUGE fucking difference between TEEN and PRE-TEEN girls. If she is made to look like a TEEN, so be it and kudos for them. However, I will side with you if she is made to look like a PRE-TEEN, but I have not seen any 18 year old girls looking age 11 as of late.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730572)
i appreciate your honesty, but the law is the law... in the US it is illegal to have sex with a minor... are you saying that sex with a minor is ok?

In the USA it is illegal, therefor for everyone else on earth it should be illegal?

Non Americans can abide by the law of the place they reside, and whatever the age is there, I'm fucking it. Law is the law. If the law is 16, I'm banging out 16. If it's 18, I'm banging out 18.

Physically speaking, when a women has her period, she is ready to breed.

Many countries have girls marry as young as 13. You going to tell THEM that THEY are wrong simply because you were raised in a country that says so?

Bottom line... NONE of us can say what is right or wrong for anyone so long as she / he is not a true pre-teen child, and we abide by the local laws.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730631)
the harm is facilitating or encouraging sex or sexual fantasies with minors...

where do we draw the line?

sex with a minor in the US will get you jail time and a label as a sex offender..

if the govt sets the bar at 18 y/o... and under that age is illegal, then the law is clear and concise..

i have no issue with that..

what i do have an issue with, is sites that cleary try to incinuate that their models are under 18...

to be frank, no 18 y/o should or would have an interest in stuffed animals or child like surroundings in a photo shoot...

i have a real prob;lem with producers or site owners trying to profit in behaviour that they know caters to pedophiles or parties interested in underage sex...

Spoken like a true American.

You ever been through Asia and South America? LOTS of grown women sleep with teddy bears. Japanese women try to look like young girls every day, even act like them during sex. Teddy bears, dress, pigtails, all of it.

With all due respect, get your head out of your American ass for a minute and realize that there is sexuality outside of what your country says is sexuality.

There is TEEN and there is PRE-TEEN. Huge difference. I agree with ASM, real pedos don't care about teddy bears or lolipops, they care about true children and the fact that they are children. Not that they "look" like they are in high school. They like the bodies on kids. They like the innocence. It is a sickness and that sickness is FAR from a guy who wacks off looking at a girl who is really 18 but looks to be 16. End of story.

Zango 02-02-2008 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730732)
thats what i am talking about... you "find them sick using your own morals and ethics"...

this is not a free speech issue or legal issue, this is more about doing the right thing....

somehthing the adult world seems to care little about.....

if a model is 18, she's 18, but why would you market a girl just because she looks underage?

whether we like it or not, this is going on everyday and persoanlly i disagree with it.....

legal or not, i think anyone can see what the overall goal is and target audience...

Coming from a guy who has "I am 1 finger away from getting my whole hand up your mom's asshole!" in his profile. Good guy to lecture on morals. Which I have none of by the way.

You have no idea about doing the right thing. You are in the wrong business if you want to do the "right thing." Go sell bibles or something. This is the wrong line of work for you. :2 cents:

cykoe6 02-02-2008 09:22 AM

It is real fucking simple. If the girl is 18 and there is a legitimate 2257 then there should be no problem. :disgust

halfpint 02-02-2008 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwilson (Post 13731013)
The girls quoted below are in my opinion far, far to young looking.


I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-02-2008 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 13731320)
I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:


if I were to take a wild out of this world guess I would say..

because they convert

because they are hot

because I would love to impregnate them

I dont know... those are just shots in the dark... I might be missing the mark

pinkbits 02-02-2008 12:00 PM

2257 proves they are 18 + so what is the problem ?

some chicks that 18 look 16 who gives a fuck she isnt pushed to do a photo shoot or hardcore scene

Twisted Dave 02-02-2008 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730614)
i see your poiont, but i have to disagree... the legal consent age in the US is 18... any site that tries to portray girls that are under that age (18) are imho just trying to entice the pedo crowd...

i could name several sites and site owners, but i won't...

i am merely staing my own personal opinion and soliciting other opinions...

Am I a pedophile because I have fucked a 17 year old ? I was 27 at the time ... and she was fucking good :) And she knew what she was doing ... plenty of times.

Fact is ... age of consent here in the UK is 16, and I'm fine with that ... tho I wont fuck a 16 year old ... I'll not fuck anyone younger than 17. But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US, a lot of people here say if they see a girl 17 years old being fucked, it's child porn. I think that's fucking obscene and completely stupid.

I think the age for shooting topless shots of girls in the UK used to be 16. Now ... while I don't need to see it ... and don't care (I'm not that into the whole 'teen' niche either because they're all portraid the same way, that glossy pink 'young' look... which doesn't interest me) .... but ... what I am getting at is that why is a girl allowed to fuck 5 guys ... 10 guys ... 100 guys in a room on her own and have a great time doing it, at the age of 16 here in the UK, yet she's 'child porn' if it's filmed?

I think the laws are all fucking over the place and they probably need some looking at :)

I think the age of consent is gonna be raised in the UK btw, to 18 ... not sure when or for sure ... but I think that's the case.

GotGauge 02-02-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banthis (Post 13730715)
You sure about those numbers? Ive always been told 18 and im from NY..

And military personnel 17? That doesnt make sense considering you cant enlist until 18...

I joind the Army at 17, Yes my parents had to sign for me. I went to basic training at 17, and turned 18 in the Army, then Shipped off to War!

minddust 02-02-2008 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed

Fuck jail time for that kind of scumbag. They should be hanged high.:2 cents:
I have ZERO tolerance about such thing. Zero.

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-02-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minddust (Post 13731757)
Fuck jail time for that kind of scumbag. They should be hanged high.:2 cents:
I have ZERO tolerance about such thing. Zero.

then statistics show you are most likely in fact a true pedophile -- fact

people who are so strongly against something or anothe most ofter are the ones who commit and or support it

you sound like a pedo

SteveLightspeed 02-02-2008 12:22 PM

Take the test

http://www.extremefunnyhumor.com/animation.php?id=69

mrwilson 02-02-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint (Post 13731320)
I aggree with this why would you want to promote girls that look so young :2 cents:

Because they convert well.

V_RocKs 02-02-2008 12:49 PM

I have a teen mailing list...

I put out a post on Kates Playground and I got 3 responses back asking me to stop sending MILF in the teen niche posts...

lol

V_RocKs 02-02-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrwilson (Post 13731798)
Because they convert well.

You can look for work, but not with that sig.
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

Zango 02-02-2008 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 13731796)

http://www.zipperfish.com/free/quizimages/jailbait4.jpg

just a punk 02-02-2008 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 13730981)
IM going to laugh my ass off the day it comes out that this joker is nailing under age boys.

Everything is possible: http://xbiz.com/news/2402 - just read this.

Zango 02-02-2008 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunchBunny Dave (Post 13731738)
Am I a pedophile because I have fucked a 17 year old ? I was 27 at the time ... and she was fucking good :) And she knew what she was doing ... plenty of times.

Fact is ... age of consent here in the UK is 16, and I'm fine with that ... tho I wont fuck a 16 year old ... I'll not fuck anyone younger than 17. But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US, a lot of people here say if they see a girl 17 years old being fucked, it's child porn. I think that's fucking obscene and completely stupid.

I think the age for shooting topless shots of girls in the UK used to be 16. Now ... while I don't need to see it ... and don't care (I'm not that into the whole 'teen' niche either because they're all portraid the same way, that glossy pink 'young' look... which doesn't interest me) .... but ... what I am getting at is that why is a girl allowed to fuck 5 guys ... 10 guys ... 100 guys in a room on her own and have a great time doing it, at the age of 16 here in the UK, yet she's 'child porn' if it's filmed?

I think the laws are all fucking over the place and they probably need some looking at :)

I think the age of consent is gonna be raised in the UK btw, to 18 ... not sure when or for sure ... but I think that's the case.

In parts of Asia it's as low as 14 and 15 for Asian men. Not foreigners. For them it bumps up to 18. lol

Fletch XXX 02-02-2008 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunchBunny Dave (Post 13731738)
But because the age of consent is 18 or whatever in the US,

there is no universal age of consent for the United States, and its not 18 - some are as low as 14

http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

it differs state to state

BlackCrayon 02-02-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?

I guess if your girlfriend is 24 but looks 16 you're a pedo...give me a break.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730553)
teen sites? personally i am sickened by sites that promote underage looking girls when the site owner knows godd and damn well that the girl looks like she is under 18... personally, i dont give a fuck if you have 2257.. if you are shooting, promoting, or marketing, a site that caters towards the pedo crowd, you should be killed or jailed...

what do you think?



I think you're a Communist.

Thanks for asking.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730572)
i appreciate your honesty, but the law is the law... in the US it is illegal to have sex with a minor...


Really?

Me thinks you may want to have a more thorough grasp of US laws before you make such a general and incorrect statement.

AaronM 02-02-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730631)
...to be frank, no 18 y/o should or would have an interest in stuffed animals or child like surroundings in a photo shoot....


You're one dumb and ignorant fuck...And as usual, DEAD fucking wrong.

I had to remove stuffed animals from Lupe's bedroom. She had WAY too many of them and Visa would never have approved the site.

You're misinformed OPINION is clouding the truth.

I'm not going to bother reading any more of this thread. It's crossed the ignorant line and heading down hill at a fast rate.

Fuck you and your misinformed opinions. :321GFY

GatorB 02-02-2008 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishTom (Post 13730588)
Age of consent in most States is 16 I seem to recall as it is in most Western European countries

Not exactly in most states where age of consent is 16 it only applies to certain male adults. A 40 year old can not fuck a 16 year old in most states even if the age of consent is 16.

For example in my state an adult male can legally fuck a 16 years old as long as he not more than 4 years( 48 months ) older than her. So if she's 16 years and 4 months as long as he's 20 and 4 months it's legal. 20 years and months he goes to jail. So legally in my state no males over 21 can fuck a minor girl unless she's married to him. I haven't seen a case in my state where some dude has been prosecuted for fucking a 17 year old even if he was much older. I guess they figure she'll be 18 soon and can fuck whoever wants anyways.

pornask 02-02-2008 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 13731891)
I have a teen mailing list...

I put out a post on Kates Playground and I got 3 responses back asking me to stop sending MILF in the teen niche posts...

lol

LOL, that's funny :1orglaugh

She looks like an overused hooker to me too, though :helpme

Michaelious 02-03-2008 10:35 AM

I wanna pull 16 year olds and I aint a Peado! Just wanna get some prime!

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-03-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michaelious (Post 13734474)
I wanna pull 16 year olds and I aint a Peado! Just wanna get some prime!


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Zuss 02-03-2008 10:44 AM

Quote:

Any man who says he dosent enjoy the beauty of a young lady is gay or full of shit.
What he said.

dig420 02-03-2008 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 13730773)
hmmm... you make a good point.. i guess i am just sensitive to the whole teen genre... reading what you posted makes me realize that there are other genres that i may not find offensive, but others might..

i guess at the end of the day i would just wish that people might use better judgement or at least more thought process when choosing to shoot, distribute, or host content, whether teen related or not....

ending every single sentence with .... doesn't make you look smart, and I think you're a little over concerned with this issue. Those 15 yr olds must be looking pretty damn good to you huh?

tony286 02-03-2008 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 13730606)
To me a pedo is someone who wants and is attracted to kids who have yet to hit puberty and much younger. Typically a pedo is moving on from the 12 year old to the younger 4 year old where he started at with the first kid.

They are not interested in teenagers with lollypops and pigtails holding teddy bears. That is just catering to the barely legal crowd which is far from what a pedo seeks.

I agree with you.

BVF 02-03-2008 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 13732155)
Not exactly in most states where age of consent is 16 it only applies to certain male adults. A 40 year old can not fuck a 16 year old in most states even if the age of consent is 16.

Wrong again...

In Ohio, I could be 100 years old and fuck a girl who just turned 16....It's like that in most states with an age of consent under 18.

pigman 03-13-2008 03:23 PM

In most european countries you can legally fuck a 15 years old girls.

moeloubani 03-13-2008 03:37 PM

That's why the law is here.


Some people look at ANY porn site and would say that the guys making it should have their nuts ripped off, so what gives that any less merit than you saying a site with girls that look younger is bad?

As long as its legal then its right you're entitled to your opinion, but you can't say that its wrong because some other people would say porn with a 35 year old woman is wrong.

Like pussyserver said, if you can say to me you look at a 17 year old chick the day before she turns 18 and you don't see anything and then you look at that same girl the next day at 18 and all of a sudden she's fuckable as shit?

The point is that LOOKING younger isn't a problem, its BEING younger that is, thats why I can say damn I'd love to bang the shit out of a hot 17 year old but I WONT do it, but if I see an 18 year old that looks like a 17 year old (and she has 2257 docs on her) then I'd be more than happy to pound the shit out of her. The only thing stopping me from pounding the shit out of the 17 year old is the law, because I can't say that her sexy young ass isn't attractive to me.

EZRhino 03-13-2008 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banthis (Post 13730715)
You sure about those numbers? Ive always been told 18 and im from NY..

And military personnel 17? That doesnt make sense considering you cant enlist until 18...

Its true and you can be in the military at age 17 with a GED and parental release.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123