Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2008, 06:06 PM   #1
TSGlider
Confirmed User
 
TSGlider's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 673
Will Hilary stand a better chance if...

she announces (before the convention) that Bubba will be her running mate?

The 12th Amendment states that anybody who is eligible for the presidency under Article II of the Constitution is eligible for the vice presidency. The 22nd Amendment, which prevents a third term, doesn't really hold up in this case.
__________________
BaDoink

skype: tsglider
TSGlider is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:08 PM   #2
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by EuroDuke View Post
The 22nd Amendment, which prevents a third term, doesn't really hold up in this case.
Yes it does.
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:10 PM   #3
TSGlider
Confirmed User
 
TSGlider's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog View Post
Yes it does.
I have a feeling that one will go to a higher court than this one if push comes to shove. There are a lot of ways to interpret it.
__________________
BaDoink

skype: tsglider
TSGlider is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:14 PM   #4
born2blog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,801
Everyone knows these elections are all staged. It's nice to believe we have any say, but c'mon, let's get with the times here and be realistic. Perhaps more people need to realize the truth of what's really going on and watch Zeitgeist about 2 or 600 times

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
__________________
Juicy Ads - Buy & Sell Quality Traffic!!
born2blog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:17 PM   #5
cherrylula
lol
 
cherrylula's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,969
even better Bill could find himself in an entire new position: the first "First Man" (?) of the White House.

Is he going to get all those cookies baked for Xmas time? Or what?
cherrylula is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:31 PM   #6
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Well, the 22cd amendment holds up, but it doesn't pertain.

A Clinton/Clinton ticket would be constitutional, I'm pretty sure... the amendment mentions "no person shall be elected to the office of the President," and places no limit on the amount of time they may serve.

The language is quite clear.

For reference: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

It would seem any President could run as a Vice President after he's served two terms... unless I'm missing some legal riff-raff. I remember this was brought up back when the idea of a Gore/Clinton ticket was considered in 2000.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:33 PM   #7
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by EuroDuke View Post
I have a feeling that one will go to a higher court than this one if push comes to shove. There are a lot of ways to interpret it.
No there isn't, and it won't happen in your lifetime.
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 06:45 PM   #8
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
The question is does the 22nd Admendment supercede the 12th and article II? They never really adressed it in the 22nd Admendment. When they got rid of prohibition it was prety clear the 21st admendment supeceded the 18th. Under Article II of the Constitution Clinton in in fact eligible for the Presidency And according to the 12th admendment can be vice president. The 22nd admendment makes no mention of VP eligibility.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:12 PM   #9
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
The question is does the 22nd Admendment supercede the 12th and article II? They never really adressed it in the 22nd Admendment. When they got rid of prohibition it was prety clear the 21st admendment supeceded the 18th. Under Article II of the Constitution Clinton in in fact eligible for the Presidency And according to the 12th admendment can be vice president. The 22nd admendment makes no mention of VP eligibility.
The ineligibility spoken of in the 12th amendment (for reference: "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States") again, speaks of ineligibility of serving (35 years of age, born in the U.S., and resident for fourteen years)... not ineligibility of being elected (as outlined in the 22cd amendment).

I don't think the it's question of what supersedes what... I don't think that question applies at all since they agree with each other in the case of Presidents that have already served their two terms.

The 21st amendment explicitly repealed the eighteenth amendment. There was no explicit procession in the 22cd amendment, because none was called for. They both agree. Again, the language is clear, imho.

A Clinton/Clinton ticket would be wholly constitutional.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31

Last edited by D; 01-28-2008 at 07:14 PM..
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:18 PM   #10
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
The real question, I think, is whether or not having Bill as second-fiddle is the way that both the Clintons and the Democratic party wanna go
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:29 PM   #11
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
I can't see that happening.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:44 PM   #12
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
VP is not part of the executive branch, no matter how much bush wished it to be. The only question is if Hillary dies in office can Bill take over? I think the answer is no.
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:48 PM   #13
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls View Post
VP is not part of the executive branch, no matter how much bush wished it to be. The only question is if Hillary dies in office can Bill take over? I think the answer is no.
I think you have your facts skewed, man.

The VP is part of the executive branch.

Earlier this term, Bush and Cheney were trying to make the point that the Vice Presidency is _not_ part of the executive.

If the President dies, the VP takes over, as outlined in the 25th Amendment.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:52 PM   #14
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
ya scratch it. Im drunk

Quote:
Originally Posted by D View Post
I think you have your facts skewed, man.

The VP is part of the executive branch.

Earlier this term, Bush and Cheney were trying to make the point that the Vice Presidency is _not_ part of the executive.

If the President dies, the VP takes over, as outlined in the 25th Amendment.
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:53 PM   #15
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls View Post
ya scratch it. Im drunk


Reminds me... time for a Bourbon.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 07:56 PM   #16
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls View Post
VP is not part of the executive branch, no matter how much bush wished it to be. The only question is if Hillary dies in office can Bill take over? I think the answer is no.

No he can't. Which the whole purpose of the VP is to take over in case something happens to the Prez. So the Speaker of the house would be President.

They could pass an constitutional amendment saying that the VP can't not have served 2 full terms as President prior to being VP. Or stating that a former President can not become VP. That would clear this whole issue up.

Another interesting scenario is let's say Bill Clinton or Bush ran and won a seat in the House of Reps. They can legally do this. And then became Speaker of the House( once again I'm not sure there is rule saying they can't take this position ) and then something happened to both the President and Vice President. The Speaker becomes the President but under the 22nd Amendment he wouldn't be able to become President.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:03 PM   #17
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
No he can't. Which the whole purpose of the VP is to take over in case something happens to the Prez. So the Speaker of the house would be President.

They could pass an constitutional amendment saying that the VP can't not have served 2 full terms as President prior to being VP. Or stating that a former President can not become VP. That would clear this whole issue up.
I'm going to assume you didn't both reading my posts in this thread.

There's a clear and legal difference between "serving" and "being elected."

Bill Clinton could definitely serve as our President again... but he could be elected as such.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 08:15 PM   #18
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by D View Post
...but he could NOT be elected as such.
correction
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:06 PM   #19
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by D View Post
I'm going to assume you didn't both reading my posts in this thread.

There's a clear and legal difference between "serving" and "being elected."

Bill Clinton could definitely serve as our President again... but he could be elected as such.
I believe you are wrong. Your broken english make this hard to tell.

"I'm going to assume you didn't both reading my posts in this thread."

WTF?
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:32 PM   #20
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
I believe you are wrong. Your broken english make this hard to tell.

"I'm going to assume you didn't both reading my posts in this thread."

WTF?
Where is my English broken?
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 09:49 PM   #21
D
Confirmed User
 
D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Valley
Posts: 7,412
Ahh... forgot the "er" on "bother"... sorry if that caused any confusion. Sometimes my fingers are playing catch-up.

Still... on the constitutional tip, I'm sure if this line of thought continues (Bill as a potential running-mate), it'll be something that's discussed in the media. Feel free to bookmark this thread for reference when the Constitutional experts start speaking up.

I'll go down on the record as saying there'd be nothing unconstitutional about a Clinton/Clinton ticket.
__________________
-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31
D is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.