![]() |
what the fuck ever
|
Quote:
"Stefansson (1946) also observed that the Inuit were able to get the necessary vitamins they needed from their traditional winter diet, which did not contain plant matter. In particular, he found that adequate Vitamin C could be obtained from items in the Inuit's traditional diet of raw meat such as ringed seal liver and whale skin." I can't do all the research for you. I can prove everything I stated, it's backed up with clear medical research. This is two times, are you going to bash this too? If you really worked out for 37 years then you know for fact the health industry has gone through massive changes and huge advancements in understating foods. And only in the last 20, really the last 10 years have we started to explode in this understanding. 1971 is a long time to be eating the same thing and working out the same way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
the point is simple... a main staple of their diet is red meat. you are saying red meat is unhealthy and has no calories. there is a difference. |
Quote:
you said specifically that red meat takes more energy to metabolize than it possesses. end of story. i can't spend my day educating you on basic nutrition and even physics... only to find out you can't add and subtract. a calorie is a unit of energy a piece of meat contains 1000 calories. you eat it. it takes energy (calories) to metabolize the meat. i am saying it would sooo obviously take less than 1000 calories to metabolize the piece of meat you are saying "it takes more energy to break it down and store it than it has" ... you are saying the 1000 calorie piece of meat costs your body more than 1000 calories to metabolize and use. the point of pointing out that people subsist largely on red meat (as you admit) was to highlight the obvious fact that you can't subsist on a food that has negative calories. it makes no fucking difference where you get "vitamin C" |
Quote:
Quote:
Then as pleasurepays says, meat can not have no calories or well those people would be dead. No calories = no energy = death in about 30 days. Health wise it seems to be the perfect diet for such people, teeth care aside. They live fairly long, few health issues and many trade for tobacco. So it would really go to proove that in some cases a pure meat and fat diet is not only healthy, it has been tested in the real world for thousands of years if not longer. |
Quote:
Welcome to the town of: I Make No Sense Population: You that statement means exactly "meat has negative calories" those are your exact words.... and its wrong. 100% incorrect. thats all i have been saying. and its the primary reason why i have been saying that you seem to understand very little about anatomy and physiology and how your body metabolizes food. if you did, you wouldn't make such naive and silly remarks... and then drive your little short bus in circles trying to defend it. |
Quote:
|
A 3 page milk thread on GFY...
|
You need to research how meat produces, stores, and uses that energy while in the body. Nothing negative happens, as you call it. You store it, it's used at different times, different rates, on different things, and it takes energy to store and even use it. You even have different types of energy.
You just don't like the fact that red meat is "bad" for you. You could care less if I'm correct or wrong, the fact that it's "bad" is what acually got you going so you continue to pull one liners out (which I explained later) and try to attack. I'm done posting with you, you can choose to educate yourself or not. Your choice if you want to close your mind. I posted proving you wrong two times, I don't feel I need to continue to do so just so you can twist things into your own view points. |
Quote:
translation: "i started by saying that meat has has negative calories. because thats what "requires more energy to digest/metabolize that it has" means. now i am backpeddling but can't really think of a way to do that which is based on actual fact and explains how your body breaks down and utilizes proteins and fats. also, i'm insane and now i'm talking about food and "different types of energy" as if that makes any sense at all... soon i'll just start down the path of metaphysics and how you can just live on air to survive" here is a fact: "educate myself" in the totally sane and rational world doesn't mean "read everything this bizarre weirdo throws my way until i agree with him and until i agree with him, i'm just wrong" in fact,... if you have to throw out the "educate yourself" line like all my favorite 9/11 and area 51 conspiracy theorists... then its because you know that you can't make a whole lot of sense on your own.. hence the effort to direct attention away from yourself and your completely wrong remarks completely. i've studied anatomy and physiology and nutrition. i don't need your new and improved version of how the body "really works" i don't care about anyones opinion about red meat. its 100% irrelevant to what it is. an organic piece of steak is just that. its not good... its not bad... its just a lump of fat, water, protein and blood. what you choose to do with it might be bad for you, but you are really stretching things to make the point that its 100% categorically bad for you no matter how you look at it. thats fine. lunatics need a way to express themselves adn you've found yours. if nothing else, your entertaining... we'll all stay tuned for your "colon cleansing is really good for you" or "man isn't supposed to eat meat" or "i can predict the future" or "scientology changed my life" threads, so i can tear them apart as well. |
Quote:
You are the master of saying nothing, I will give you that. |
Pleasurepays has work to do... there's no time for joining in on the retardathon
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123