Early Iowa #s Show Ron Paul at 11% - GoFuckYourself.com

notoldschool · 01-03-2008, 06:10 PM

3rd is just like first for Ron Paul.

tblake · 01-03-2008, 06:13 PM

Yea and beating out Guiliani is certainly going to cause a controversy and get his message out even further. Everyone is going to ask who the hell this guy is once he gets 3rd.

BV · 01-03-2008, 06:15 PM

Go Ron Go!

BV · 01-03-2008, 06:17 PM

There will be a lot of people eating crow around here!

VOTE RON PAUL!

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 06:19 PM

baddog · 01-03-2008, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool

3rd is just like first for Ron Paul.

So, he isn't the first place loser, he is the second place loser? How is 3rd like 1st? Just because your Little League coach told you it was, he was only trying to make you feel better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV

There will be a lot of people eating crow around here!

Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?

collegeboobies · 01-03-2008, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

So, he isn't the first place loser, he is the second place loser? How is 3rd like 1st? Just because your Little League coach told you it was, he was only trying to make you feel better.

Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?

Iowa has not predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter. And in the primary there are no electoral votes......

GO RON PAUL

BV · 01-03-2008, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Quote:
Really, how many electoral votes do they give third place in Iowa?

Just wait pops! Get your George Foreman plugged in and the counter cleaned off.

baddog · 01-03-2008, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies

Iowa has not predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter. And in the primary there are no electoral votes......

GO RON PAUL

Perhaps electoral votes was the wrong phrase, but I am drawing a blank.

The primaries are so they know how many of their votes will go to which candidate at the RNC/DNC. Some states divide them according to the % you got in the primaries, others are an all or nothing situation.

How does IA do it?

collegeboobies · 01-03-2008, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Perhaps electoral votes was the wrong phrase, but I am drawing a blank.

The primaries are so they know how many of their votes will go to which candidate at the RNC/DNC. Some states divide them according to the % you got in the primaries, others are an all or nothing situation.

How does IA do it?

Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

BV · 01-03-2008, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies

Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

AMEN to that. You took the words right out of my mouth.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies

Never looked into how IA does it, since they havent predicted the winner since Jimmy Carter, the first few states for Ron Paul are just to prove he's not a 4% guy like most people claim. It proves people wrong when they attack him as no chance and he ends up doing better than the "people with a chance"

how does 11% of republican votes in the Iowa caucus equate to "he's not the 4% guy like most people claim" which is a referrence to general popularity nationwide?

baddog · 01-03-2008, 06:42 PM

I guess my sources are different than notbeentoschool

Mike Huckabee 487 33.4%
W. Mitt Romney 351 24.1%
Fred Thompson 260 17.8%
John McCain 171 11.7%
Ron Paul 154 10.6%
Rudy Giuliani 33 2.3%
Duncan Hunter 3 0.2%
Tom Tancredo 0 0.0%

Source

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

notoldschool · 01-03-2008, 06:44 PM

way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

BV · 01-03-2008, 06:45 PM

I can tell you one thing, Huckabee is the last person any of us here want in office.

You can take that to the bank and put some in your pipe also!

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I guess my sources are different than notbeentoschool

Mike Huckabee 487 33.4%
W. Mitt Romney 351 24.1%
Fred Thompson 260 17.8%
John McCain 171 11.7%
Ron Paul 154 10.6%
Rudy Giuliani 33 2.3%
Duncan Hunter 3 0.2%
Tom Tancredo 0 0.0%

Source

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

if theologians can create Biblical Math to make the book of Genesis line up with the Fossile Record... then Ron Paul supporters are entitled to create PaulTard Math to prove he will matter.

baddog · 01-03-2008, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool

way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

And fifth?

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul?

HAHA!

dav3 · 01-03-2008, 06:48 PM

That whackjob Huckabee is leading there, so let's not have too much faith in Iowa just yet.

TSGlider · 01-03-2008, 06:53 PM

Good for him. All of you guys who are supporting him better get out there and pound the pavement. He needs all the grassroots help he can get (that isn't an insult, it's the truth).

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dav3

That whackjob Huckabee is leading there, so let's not have too much faith in Iowa just yet.

i would consider a mormon to be pretty goofy myself.

i just can't get past that.

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EuroDuke

Good for him. All of you guys who are supporting him better get out there and pound the pavement. He needs all the grassroots help he can get (that isn't an insult, it's the truth).

Why do that when they can sit at home and create thread after thread and post after post on GFY?

baddog · 01-03-2008, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz

Why do that when they can sit at home and create thread after thread and post after post on GFY?

Hey, they are having virtual marches while playing WOW. What else do they need to do?

collegeboobies · 01-03-2008, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

how does 11% of republican votes in the Iowa caucus equate to "he's not the 4% guy like most people claim" which is a referrence to general popularity nationwide?

A certain Fox News anchor I spoke with predicted Ron Paul at 4% in a conversation with me last week. 11% proves them wrong.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies

A certain Fox News anchor I spoke with predicted Ron Paul at 4% in a conversation with me last week. 11% proves them wrong.

you can't watch FOX News or take them seriously and be a good American

strike 1

collegeboobies · 01-03-2008, 07:09 PM

so far with 25% in the race for 3rd place is within 3% for a few people.

collegeboobies · 01-03-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

you can't watch FOX News and be a good American

strike 1

I spoke with him in person, never said I watch it.

uno · 01-03-2008, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool

way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege.

You are hilarious.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by collegeboobies

I spoke with him in person, never said I watch it.

you're still guilty by association.

probably already on the Anne Coulter mailing list.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 07:17 PM

oooops!

Ron Paul... now slipping behind Giuliani

baddog · 01-03-2008, 07:19 PM

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

GatorB · 01-03-2008, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

oooops!

Ron Paul... now slipping behind Giuliani

3rd place 13% 6th place 10% not much difference.

GatorB · 01-03-2008, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

Considering that Faux News and other baised idiots according to their "polls" says Paul only had 4% support. Should Thompson be proud of his 3rd place finish with 13%?

uno · 01-03-2008, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA

Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

6th is the new 3rd.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 07:23 PM

6th place is as good as 5th place, which has already been proven to be as good as 3rd place, which we all know is basically the same as 1st place.

baddog · 01-03-2008, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

3rd place 13% 6th place 10% not much difference.

So 6th place is as good as 1st for Ron Paul?

Fuzzy math.

baddog · 01-03-2008, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Considering that Faux News and other baised idiots according to their "polls" says Paul only had 4% support. Should Thompson be proud of his 3rd place finish with 13%?

At least he is ahead of McCain and Giuliani who did not even campaign there.

ytcracker · 01-03-2008, 07:26 PM

come on paul

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

6th place is as good as 5th place, which has already been proven to be as good as 3rd place, which we all know is basically the same as 1st place.

Agent 488 · 01-03-2008, 07:49 PM

things would be different if the primary was held in world or warcraft.

Myst · 01-03-2008, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz

Agent 488 · 01-03-2008, 07:51 PM

illuminati voting machines pwned ron paul.

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes

things would be different if the primary was held in world or warcraft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes

illuminati voting machines pwned ron paul.

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ytcracker

come on paul

FYI, i had a guy who worked for me a few years ago that started telling me that "there used to be this hacker guy Ytcracker who defaced a lot of high profile websites and he was my hero"

he has never had anything to do with adult... it was just kind of funny.

xxxdesign-net · 01-03-2008, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz

wow.. you're dedicated.. you create all your material?

ytcracker · 01-03-2008, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

FYI, i had a guy who worked for me a few years ago that started telling me that "there used to be this hacker guy Ytcracker who defaced a lot of high profile websites and he was my hero"

he has never had anything to do with adult... it was just kind of funny.

awesome

my legend still reigns

Pleasurepays · 01-03-2008, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malicious Biz

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

charlie g · 01-03-2008, 08:48 PM

I am officially changing my support to hucklebee. Not only does he have chuck norris on his side, but also kungfoo jesus, slaying sinners at every turn, and the fox news network. Thumping the good book getting the faithful out to the caucus, he is electable and that's all that matters to me... principles be damned. I am almost tempted to get pleaseurepays off the ignore list so we can high five each other on our great victory. I see malicious chimed in with words of wisdom too.

Vote huckleberry and go to heaven 2008!

Malicious Biz · 01-03-2008, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g

I am officially changing my support to hucklebee. Not only does he have chuck norris on his side, but also kungfoo jesus, slaying sinners at every turn, and the fox news network. Thumping the good book getting the faithful out to the caucus, he is electable and that's all that matters to me... principles be damned. I am almost tempted to get pleaseurepays off the ignore list so we can high five each other on our great victory. I see malicious chimed in with words of wisdom too.

Vote huckleberry and go to heaven 2008!

01-03-2008, 06:10 PM	#1
notoldschool Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 5,687	Early Iowa #s Show Ron Paul at 11% 3rd is just like first for Ron Paul. __________________ No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture. -- Learned Hand http://www.bjpenn.com

01-03-2008, 06:13 PM	#2
tblake Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 157	Yea and beating out Guiliani is certainly going to cause a controversy and get his message out even further. Everyone is going to ask who the hell this guy is once he gets 3rd. __________________ Travis - XBIZ p: 310-820-0228 ex 703 ICQ: 390-705-165 [email protected] XBIZ.COM \| XBIZ World \| XBIZ VIDEO My Adult Who's Who Profile

01-03-2008, 06:42 PM	#13
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I guess my sources are different than notbeentoschool Mike Huckabee 487 33.4% W. Mitt Romney 351 24.1% Fred Thompson 260 17.8% John McCain 171 11.7% Ron Paul 154 10.6% Rudy Giuliani 33 2.3% Duncan Hunter 3 0.2% Tom Tancredo 0 0.0% Source Is fifth as good as third which is as good as first for Ron Paul? Last edited by baddog; 01-03-2008 at 06:43 PM..

01-03-2008, 06:44 PM	#14
notoldschool Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 5,687	way to wait till the new numbers came out to say shit. What I mean by third as good is first means the media wont be able to ignore him like they do now if he gets third, then everyone will hear his messege. __________________ No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture. -- Learned Hand http://www.bjpenn.com

01-03-2008, 06:48 PM	#19
dav3 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,348	That whackjob Huckabee is leading there, so let's not have too much faith in Iowa just yet. __________________ Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

01-03-2008, 06:15 PM	#3
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	Go Ron Go!

01-03-2008, 06:17 PM	#4
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	There will be a lot of people eating crow around here! VOTE RON PAUL!

01-03-2008, 06:19 PM	#5
Malicious Biz So Fucking Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Put Shoe On Head Plz Posts: 4,575

01-03-2008, 06:45 PM	#15
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	I can tell you one thing, Huckabee is the last person any of us here want in office. You can take that to the bank and put some in your pipe also!

01-03-2008, 06:53 PM	#20
TSGlider Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 673	Good for him. All of you guys who are supporting him better get out there and pound the pavement. He needs all the grassroots help he can get (that isn't an insult, it's the truth). __________________ BaDoink skype: tsglider

01-03-2008, 07:09 PM	#26
collegeboobies So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 3,644	so far with 25% in the race for 3rd place is within 3% for a few people.

01-03-2008, 07:17 PM	#30
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	oooops! Ron Paul... now slipping behind Giuliani

01-03-2008, 07:19 PM	#31
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/pri...ults/state/#IA Looks like Paul is dropping to 6th . . . behind two guys that did not even campaign there.

01-03-2008, 07:23 PM	#35
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	6th place is as good as 5th place, which has already been proven to be as good as 3rd place, which we all know is basically the same as 1st place.

01-03-2008, 07:26 PM	#38
ytcracker stc is the greatest Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: rip sean murray Posts: 12,403	come on paul __________________ www.ytcracker.com \| www.digitalgangster.com i love you

01-03-2008, 07:49 PM	#40
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	things would be different if the primary was held in world or warcraft.

01-03-2008, 07:51 PM	#42
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	illuminati voting machines pwned ron paul.

01-03-2008, 08:48 PM	#49
charlie g Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Center of the Universe Posts: 2,759	I am officially changing my support to hucklebee. Not only does he have chuck norris on his side, but also kungfoo jesus, slaying sinners at every turn, and the fox news network. Thumping the good book getting the faithful out to the caucus, he is electable and that's all that matters to me... principles be damned. I am almost tempted to get pleaseurepays off the ignore list so we can high five each other on our great victory. I see malicious chimed in with words of wisdom too. Vote huckleberry and go to heaven 2008! __________________ AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com -------------------------------