AVN: NATS/TMM Breached for More Than a Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheDoc
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2001
    • 13827

    #106
    Originally posted by Doctor Dre
    Are they investigating the money trail or not ?
    I think the money trail has been exposed already.. Question is will people out who it is. Email lists are easy to pawn off as purchased from others too :/

    I think TMM is on the hacker trail - but only being a week afterwards I haven't asked
    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
    It's all disambiguation

    Comment

    • Doctor Dre
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jan 2001
      • 51692

      #107
      Originally posted by TheDoc
      I think the money trail has been exposed already.. Question is will people out who it is. Email lists are easy to pawn off as purchased from others too :/

      I think TMM is on the hacker trail - but only being a week afterwards I haven't asked
      The money trail has been exposed by webmasters teaming up and asking questions... that's beside the point.

      Why are NATs not letting us know they are looking into things if they are ?
      Originally posted by rayadp05
      I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

      Comment

      • tony299
        lurker
        • Aug 2002
        • 57021

        #108
        Originally posted by TheDoc
        Paul and Will76, did both of you end up with the short ends of the stick?

        Yeah, we know hacks/exploits targeted at NATS have taken place for years. Every host, program owner, and webmaster knows this. It's not some secret that you guys want to find out about.

        NATS job is NOT to provide security. It’s to provide a program backend, only. YOUR job is to secure it, your hosts and yours, period.

        So how did those accounts get breached before? That's very simple logic, let me help. When a NATS "Machine" is exploited they got your ass, your pw's, ect.. (Exploits targeted at NATS machines happen daily) Once they have the admin data they can start running the bot that pulls the data.

        So get it through your heads, NATS thought the attacks were different. Different enough that even Admins at the same host didn’t know it was the same attackers.

        Why don't you guys go bash the Program Owners who failed basic 101 security? Why not yell at the hosts they host with? NATS job is to provide us the software, not the security.

        I put my trust into my host, and my own skills not in software that I have ask for support on and can’t modify myself.
        I dont have a horse in this but just from reading all of this your trying way too hard.
        Last edited by tony286; 01-03-2008, 06:22 AM.

        Comment

        • notoldschool
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2007
          • 5687

          #109
          Originally posted by fuckingfuck


          notoldschool = IDIOT BRO

          Wow, now im am complete. I feel so accomplished now. maybe we should all call minusonut a bro so maybe he will get off our industries nuts.

          Not that it matters I will state again that I dont know one single person at nats other than when I need something done to my proggie. I do push quite a bit of traffic to all types of programs, and Im not talking the couple hundred clicks most of you part time affiliates push, and I know for a fact that most of the nats programs work a shit load better than some of the other garbage back ends some of these shady ass programs have. I work it from both ends so I know what proggies to stay away from because of their homemade backend. Nats is great software for sure. Atleast We know about what happened with nats and that its fixed. Im also sick of you bitches that call yourselfs adult webmasters trying to ruin a biz that in reality you are not even part of. Let me spell it out, if you have been in the biz more than a year and your not pushing atleast 10000 uniques a day somewhere, then you are NOT and adult webmaster and should keep your limited knowledge to yourselfs. You just sound like the idiots that you are.
          No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
          -- Learned Hand

          http://www.bjpenn.com

          Comment

          • TheDoc
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jul 2001
            • 13827

            #110
            Originally posted by tony404
            I dont have a horse in this but just from reading all of this your trying way too hard.
            No worries Tony, I'm done with these two tools. They read past the answers and modify their own questions for personal benefit.
            ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
            It's all disambiguation

            Comment

            • TheDoc
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jul 2001
              • 13827

              #111
              Originally posted by Doctor Dre
              The money trail has been exposed by webmasters teaming up and asking questions... that's beside the point.

              Why are NATs not letting us know they are looking into things if they are ?
              How exactly would NATS follow the money trail? Wouldn't it take Webmasters to team up and expose it for them? And I know who they are, so what? NATS can't sue them.

              NATS is looking into things, they have stated they are hunting down the hacker. Of course they can't comment more, I wouldn't either, nobody doing an investigation would.

              Logic people, logic...
              ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
              It's all disambiguation

              Comment

              • frank7799
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 1974

                #112
                Originally posted by TheDoc
                NATS job is NOT to provide security. It?s to provide a program backend, only. YOUR job is to secure it, your hosts and yours, period.
                It´s not their job to provide security of their customers servers. But they - NATS - required a server access. So it´s their job to take care of it.

                Comment

                • borked
                  Totally Borked
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 6284

                  #113
                  Originally posted by TheDoc
                  So get it through your heads, NATS thought the attacks were different. Different enough that even Admins at the same host didn?t know it was the same attackers.
                  ORLy? which host would this be then???

                  For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                  (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                  All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                  Comment

                  • TheDoc
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 13827

                    #114
                    Originally posted by borked
                    ORLy? which host would this be then???
                    Umm.. Well the old apache exploits/admin targets came in through VOIP IP exploits and not from the FL IP. So previous admin/attacks came through server level exploits first, once they had access they exploited the data the exact same way. This is why NATS made the admin/webmaster pw's one way, so they can't be pulled from the admin. A security step by NATS, mind blowing I know.

                    Hosts didn't know it was the same attacker each time doing the same thing in different ways. Not until recently at least and once people started posting on GFY, then people put two and two together, we saw it right here, live. Yes, I'm sure a couple of hosts knew something was going down, but they sure as hell didn't talk about it, fear, pfft..

                    If John ever threatened me for exposing an exploit I would have blasted his ass all of the boards. Anyone that wouldn't do the same is weak minded.

                    NATS has a ticket system. You have to post in for all support, ect. And icq history for those they talk to on ICQ. If all these clients really had these problems, threats, ect about the hacks/ips, exploits then why don't they just post the tickets? I'm sure people have tickets, I do, but they show NATS helping and not threating.

                    NATS isn't perfect, boy it's far from perfect. Clients already knew this - guess it was only time for Webmasters to find out. Support isn't the fastest, they don't always work on weekends, and you don't always get the right support person smart enough to help with your complex problem.

                    And since NATS doesn't monitor my NATS/server 24/7 - I take security into my own hands and my hosts, as it should be.
                    Last edited by TheDoc; 01-03-2008, 08:33 AM.
                    ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                    It's all disambiguation

                    Comment

                    • borked
                      Totally Borked
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 6284

                      #115
                      so you're saying this recently exposed hack was done by the same guy that did the previous exploit?

                      For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                      (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                      All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                      Comment

                      • ServerGenius
                        Confirmed User
                        • Feb 2002
                        • 9377

                        #116
                        They better shut up about all this until they have concrete answer backed up
                        with facts and/or proof in a well written statement.....the guessing and
                        insinuations aren't doing any side good at this point.......well except for
                        entertainment of course........fuck it.....continue
                        | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                        Comment

                        • TheDoc
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Jul 2001
                          • 13827

                          #117
                          Originally posted by borked
                          so you're saying this recently exposed hack was done by the same guy that did the previous exploit?
                          I think it's the same group attacking us for the last 10 years. That damn voip exploit to connect and pull data works the same, but it's a different way of doing it. Either way the same method of getting the data was done and back then it didn't have to done through a nats admin account.

                          So other than the login ip - no I don't have any real proof it's the same people. Other than over the last several months. But my point was more than they attack us in several ways - but they always appear to get the data the same exact way once they are in.

                          Do you have something that points that it's more than one group/person?
                          ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                          It's all disambiguation

                          Comment

                          • ServerGenius
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2002
                            • 9377

                            #118
                            Originally posted by TheDoc
                            I think it's the same group attacking us for the last 10 years. That damn voip exploit to connect and pull data works the same, but it's a different way of doing it. Either way the same method of getting the data was done and back then it didn't have to done through a nats admin account.

                            So other than the login ip - no I don't have any real proof it's the same people. Other than over the last several months. But my point was more than they attack us in several ways - but they always appear to get the data the same exact way once they are in.

                            Do you have something that points that it's more than one group/person?
                            Ok I'll bite this whole discussion about the hack, and how it was possible
                            to have happened....added with all the bullshit that every program could get
                            hacked just as the servers they're on.....that's all nice and dandy but it's
                            completely irrelevant to the argument........


                            Well ok....not completely it only serves the purpose to divert the negative
                            attention to a different subject in order to make it seem less bad as it already is.


                            So now you probably say.....well is that so? So what's the part then that DOES
                            matter about all this......

                            Brace yourselves here it comes.......The fact that it happened, TMM knowing
                            about it for a LONG time and didn't take proper action and informed their
                            clients about it.......making it appear...(I'll keep it polite tonight) that they
                            were trying to hide it hoping they'd be able to fix situation before it blew up
                            in their face like it did recently......

                            That's all.....continue the discussion please and show us what's your interest
                            in this by judging the arguments you come up with......


                            Last edited by ServerGenius; 01-03-2008, 09:00 AM.
                            | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                            Comment

                            • TheDoc
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jul 2001
                              • 13827

                              #119
                              Originally posted by ServerGenius
                              Brace yourselves here it comes.......The fact that it happened, TMM knowing about it for a LONG time and didn't take proper action and informed their clients about it.......making it appear...(I'll keep it polite tonight) that they were trying to hide it hoping they'd be able to fix situation before it blew up in their face like it did recently......


                              Sad as it is, if this didn't come out on the boards it wouldn't have been fixed. They didn't know wtf to look for. It blew up in their faces because they aren't security admins and the true fact that John's ego blocks his brain waves sometimes doesn't help.

                              But we all already know this.. We all know nats fucked up, no reason to bring up the dead horse another 1000000 times. The lesson to be learned, again... Is security is YOUR responsibility and not NATS.

                              And I thought we were talking about previous hacks/exploits with NATS?
                              Do you even use NATS?
                              ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                              It's all disambiguation

                              Comment

                              • ServerGenius
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2002
                                • 9377

                                #120
                                Originally posted by TheDoc
                                Sad as it is, if this didn't come out on the boards it wouldn't have been fixed. They didn't know wtf to look for. It blew up in their faces because they aren't security admins and the true fact that John's ego blocks his brain waves sometimes doesn't help.

                                But we all already know this.. We all know nats fucked up, no reason to bring up the dead horse another 1000000 times. The lesson to be learned, again... Is security is YOUR responsibility and not NATS.

                                And I thought we were talking about previous hacks/exploits with NATS?
                                Do you even use NATS?
                                I don't I had clients who did and got insulted by TMM on numerous occasions
                                when the issue was raised in a few occasions which all were done directly and
                                very politely to them and kept non public.

                                And not only insulted but badmouthed behind my back to clients......
                                | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                                Comment

                                Working...