GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Will Ron Paul run as an independent after he loses in the Republican primaries? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=795959)

GatorB 12-31-2007 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13584204)
Check your history. Paul said Reagan was a failure and attempted to distance himself from him . . . which is exactly the opposite of any Republican candidate today.


Reagan didn't use pre-emption by the way. He defeated the Soviets without firing a shot.

Paul was right. Everyone was sick of Korea which Truman got us into and they voted for Ike. Everyone was sick of Viet Nam which Kennedy and LBJ got us into and the voted for Nixon. I mean NIXON of all people. You've got to be pretty pissed off and desperate to have voted for NIXON for President as your solution.

notoldschool 12-31-2007 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13584204)
Check your history. Paul said Reagan was a failure and attempted to distance himself from him . . . which is exactly the opposite of any Republican candidate today.

Come on now, do you know why he distanced himself from Reagan? I can tell you that it was not because he decided to not be a conservative. Funny how you call me stupid. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GatorB 12-31-2007 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 13584233)
Will Ron Paul run as an independent after he loses in the Republican primaries?
++++++++

Nah, he knows that's a dead end.

And running for the GOP nomination isn't? If he's not serious WFT is he running for? I'm interested in reading your theory.

Socks 12-31-2007 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 13584209)
He is Canadian, dumbass. How could he be part of the problem?

Yeah! What he said!

PS:

<------------ Look left.

GatorB 12-31-2007 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 13584246)
Come on now, do you know why he distanced himself from Reagan? I can tell you that it was not because he decided to not be a conservative. Funny how you call me stupid. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Could it have been that Reagan created a deficit so large it was larger than the deficits all the other Presdients from Washington to Carter created COMBINED?

Socks 12-31-2007 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 13584198)
It's sad it took you 7 years to figure out what I knew back in 2000. Next time try listening to people. Thanks for being part of the problem and fucking things up.

Kinda sad it took you 10,000 posts to realize how GFY works. :winkwink:

DaddyHalbucks 12-31-2007 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 13584125)
Scariest thing for me was seeing the "defense" budget of the USA, at around $600bln dollars.. Closely trailed by the UK at... ~$35bln.

USA has 2 oceans, Canada (can throw snowballs) and Mexico (can throw tacos) bordering their country.

Most other countries with bitter enemies going back hundreds of years that they SHARE a border with, and even they don't see a need for this kind of... "defense".

Because we all know Portland was almost taken by the rebels last year!

As someone who lives as part of the "rest of the world" it's very fucking scary. I just wish you guys would care a little bit more about protecting the rest of us while you're at it. :/


Our oceans didn't stop 9/11.

The Chinese... guess which country is funding the Chinese military by buying billions of dollars worth of their low quality merchandise? Guess which country's technology was stolen and is now part of Chinese ICBMs?

The Russians... do you know how many nukes they still have? Are they all accounted for? Does that ever bother you?

Do you know spying by the Chinese and Russians is at cold war levels?

OK, you can go back to sleep now. Have a Molson's and roll over.

:upsidedow

Socks 12-31-2007 02:30 PM

Your country is making the Chinese and Russians look... friendly.

Ever think of that? Now the USA is grouped with the same countries you list as scary.

And I know how many nukes you have.. 30,000+.

notoldschool 12-31-2007 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 13584271)
Our oceans didn't stop 9/11.

The Chinese... guess which country is funding the Chinese military by buying billions of dollars worth of their low quality merchandise? Guess which country's technology was stolen and is now part of Chinese ICBMs?

The Russians... do you know how many nukes they still have? Are they all accounted for? Does that ever bother you?

Do you know spying by the Chinese and Russians is at cold war levels?

OK, you can go back to sleep now. Have a Molson's and roll over.

:upsidedow

blah blah blah....and you guys say its the paultards that are conspiracy theorists. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

We need your money for our make believe war.

GatorB 12-31-2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 13584271)
Our oceans didn't stop 9/11.

:upsidedow

No the stupid Canadians let's them through.

drjones 12-31-2007 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 13584275)
Your country is making the Chinese and Russians look... friendly.

Ever think of that? Now the USA is grouped with the same countries you list as scary.

And I know how many nukes you have.. 30,000+.

Actually im pretty sure its 300,000+, not a measly 30,000

Socks 12-31-2007 02:38 PM

stupid and Canadians don't go in the same sentence. Go visit your local pawn shop on the way to your local trailer park.

notoldschool 12-31-2007 02:50 PM

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2007/dec...breaking-yahoo

Bet I know why.

V_RocKs 12-31-2007 03:02 PM

Sleepy time.

GatorB 12-31-2007 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drjones (Post 13584292)
Actually im pretty sure its 300,000+, not a measly 30,000

Actually is way under 30,000 more like 3000 now. We've been dismantling nukes for over 15 years now. Still enough to blow the world up 10X over.

Manowar 12-31-2007 03:54 PM

when the whole of digg.com vote for him, maybe

MandyBlake 12-31-2007 06:37 PM

i think he should. it would make things pretty darn interesting.

tony286 12-31-2007 07:09 PM

Actually next week there is a meeting of dem's and rep's.The focus of the meeting is how to handle if bloomberg decides to run as a independent. The man can spend 500 million of his own money and they are scared shitless..

baddog 12-31-2007 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 13585146)
Actually next week there is a meeting of dem's and rep's.The focus of the meeting is how to handle if bloomberg decides to run as a independent. The man can spend 500 million of his own money and they are scared shitless..

have a link to that?

notoldschool 12-31-2007 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 13585146)
Actually next week there is a meeting of dem's and rep's.The focus of the meeting is how to handle if bloomberg decides to run as a independent. The man can spend 500 million of his own money and they are scared shitless..


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GatorB 12-31-2007 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 13585146)
Actually next week there is a meeting of dem's and rep's.The focus of the meeting is how to handle if bloomberg decides to run as a independent. The man can spend 500 million of his own money and they are scared shitless..

Bloomberg/Paul 08 or vise versa. Would scare dems and repubs shitless

notoldschool 12-31-2007 11:09 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-hy5u7C4x0A&feature=related

great new video

minusonebit 12-31-2007 11:12 PM

No, he'll run as a Libertarian, cause thats what he is. He ain't no fucking goofy republican. And lets be honest: the GOP and the Dems are so far to the extremes it ain't even funny. The LP is the new moderate party. The voice of reason.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123