TMM and TMM / NATS clients Please explain this and SHOW me I'm wrong!!!!

That is a good question. I will have to ask the techs.

Also, as I said, I was a bit confused by his question. It was a worded a bit strangely. He mentioned 5 months ago. I have no way of knowing who this is or what they had or did not have setup. So it is hard to comment.

If he has a question or accusation he should ask or make it.

SG can you tell me where I'd pull those reports?

Also, we never said this issue did not occur prior to 2 months ago. We said we learned of it a few months ago. We are not 100% sure how long it as gone on for.

Hasn't this all been covered already? Many times?

that sure is interesting...

What about it is interesting?

At the very least this might be an indication that his problem started happening months before anyone here originally thought.

I would think nailing down the time of the initial problems would be "interesting", as from an investigative standpoint, it could aid in finding the person(s) responsible no?

I don't doubt it was going on 5 months prior. And I didn't think that is what he meant by interesting. You have to admit the original post had a strange tone to it. Whether that was intentional or not I don't know. I don't know SG to be the attacking type so it is probably just the way he speaks, but you know how GFY can interpret whatever they want and run with it.

What does a denied page look like? Does it have the same file size each time its requested or does it contain some dynamic information? If its static, the file size should be the same each time, not quite what the log is showing.
WG

Too techie for me. lol

I agree. As I said to BA I will have to ask the techs. I would assume that he did not have the IP restriction on 5 months ago. I have no way of knowing that as I don't know who it is and I have not spoken with them. SG did not say they had the restriction on, just that since it is at a different host it shouldn't be able to access it. That would require the restriction be on and setup properly. I can't speak to that.

Gonna read this once again as I wake up tomorrow = interesting read as always Hans !

Sounds like he's suspecting something but he dosen't want to attack anybody without definite proof.

our old program amateurwealth had test signup emails getting spammed about 2-3 weeks after they were entered

BEFORE WE EVER ANNNOUNCED OR WENT LIVE

anyone who's been here for a while knows amateurwealth was a long time ago with epic jim, trey (pimpdogg) & myself

maybe the brand new server was hacked
maybe someone at paycom was selling lists
maybe this nats bug is WAY older than a few months (think at least a year)

thats all

Hi,

I don't try to accuse anyone nor do I intend to. Also I haven't read all posts
and threads about all this so forgive me if I ask something that has been
answered once or many times before.

I also mentioned this isn't from my own servers/business as I don't use
NATS myself, this is from someone I assist with tech stuff and who asked
me about it......which only asked recently so that's why it wasn't brought
up before by me......perhaps the person has brought it up before as he did
mention asking some things earlier but the times he did he got replies that
both didn't answer his question as well as made clear it's better to don't
ask about it more or again........but that could have been something else
and I don't know or care to know exactly what was said.......

The question you asked regarding the status code that always would be
200 but not return the contents it normally returns already has been answered. Data that is returned isn't default or don't contain anything
as which the size of it shows......

I mentioned 2 months as I believed and understood that that was
said in a statement by you......if that's wrong....then I misunderstand
and stand corrected.

AmateurWealth has only existed for a year ?