Paul Markham |
12-27-2007 12:38 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Dre
(Post 13563524)
He's going a damn good job at keeping the drama on the map, he's just going too far... Instead of asking questions people don't have the balls to ask, he simply bash and tries to blow up the issue in mainstream media.
This will only end up hurting us all.
|
At least someone is keeping it on the map. It seems a lot of sponsors have decided the cost of moving from NATS is not worth it and will say anything to get this off the map.
I have asked some very specific questions that John will not answer, will not or cannot?
Questions related to exactly what did he fix when it became obvious his system was compromised and how. It took posters here minutes to find the problem in NATS, the login, times, IP and other things. So what fixing did TMM carry out?
John claims he warned "at risk clients", seen any come forward to verify this?
Yet it appears he did threaten people who were going to make it public.
Did he change the system to make the IP locking down default or did he keep the compromised system default?
I'm not sure about this but maybe others can tell me. Did John tell people who complained unique email addresses were getting spammed that the problem was in the end or not. In the last three months? Remember it's after he "fixed" the problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber-Hu$tler
(Post 13563571)
If what minusonebrain says is true, then it sucks that it takes a racist password sharing coward who's not even in our industry to step up and do something about it.
|
It's a reflection on us.
|