|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moo Moo Cow
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,748
|
New Copyright Laws on the way...
The Story
Here are some of the major sections of the PRO IP Act: * Fines in copyright cases dealing with compilations would be increased. Right now, as in the case of Xoom v. Imageline, the maximum penalty for infringement of one compilation is $30,000. Now courts would be able to make "multiple awards of statutory damages" when compilations are infringed. * Maximum penalties for repeat copyright offenders would be easier to obtain. Current law says that anyone who "willfully" infringes a copyright by distributing over $1,000 worth of material (including over a peer-to-peer network) is a criminal. The PRO IP Act keeps the 10-year prison term intact for felonious repeat offenders--but, crucially, deletes the requirement that repeat offenders must have distributed at least 10 copyrighted works within 180 days. * Any computer or network hardware used to "facilitate" a copyright crime could be seized by the Justice Department and auctioned off. The proceeds would be funneled to the agency's budget. The process is called civil asset forfeiture, and typically the owner does not need to be found guilty of a crime for his property to be taken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,036
|
If the legislation is well thought out - that should keep legislators entangled and distracted for a while and away from priorities
Sounds like just more legislation and increased bureaucracy for the sake of it - international agreements for protection already exist, but they want US citizens to have stiffer penalties?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Uranus
Posts: 2,808
|
Great, does this mean that the Justice Department can just seize all of Google's YouTube servers?
|
|
|
|