What do you want in RSS blog feeds? - GoFuckYourself.com

Damian_Maxcash · 11-19-2007, 03:26 PM

What size images do you prefer, how many, ammount of text that sort of thing.....?

I want to get this up and running for MaxCash ASAP.

Give me your wish list!

Damian_Maxcash · 11-19-2007, 03:39 PM

What - Nobody....?

spacedog · 11-19-2007, 03:43 PM

Pics max 375 pixels wide.

BOLD text for links.

long descriptions with keywords relevant to post

No sneaking in url or domain name in post for type ins

Damian_Maxcash · 11-19-2007, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

Pics max 375 pixels wide.

BOLD text for links.

long descriptions with keywords relevant to post

No sneaking in url or domain name in post for type ins

Thats great - Thanks

I hate the URL thing as well.....

Stephen · 11-19-2007, 04:03 PM

feeds that feature no nudity or lacivious exhibition for those of us that care about 2257

Damian_Maxcash · 11-19-2007, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

feeds that feature no nudity or lacivious exhibition for those of us that care about 2257

Good point.... Thanks

CunningStunt · 11-19-2007, 04:43 PM

Daily / 3 times weekly updates. Well written keyword rich content relevant to the niche. A good paragraph of text at least. Clear images.

papill0n · 11-19-2007, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CunningStunt

Daily / 3 times weekly updates. Well written keyword rich content relevant to the niche. A good paragraph of text at least. Clear images.

what he said plus no css styling of the posts

CurrentlySober · 11-19-2007, 05:09 PM

Markhams Magic Join links please

CurrentlySober · 11-19-2007, 05:10 PM

Actually that no url in post is interesting... Never really thought of that before...

BSleazy · 11-19-2007, 05:12 PM

Morphing feeds

ungratefulninja · 11-19-2007, 06:03 PM

Links in the actual post, not just the title as a link.

AmeliaG · 11-19-2007, 09:21 PM

I like decent sized large-ish pictures and at least a small paragraph of text. I believe an affiliate blog should be a lot like a real blog that way. If someone wants smaller pictures, the code for that is easy, so better to err a bit on the large side.

I think most people prefer nonnude or softcore images to be on the safe side.

I couldn't care less if the URL is in there. Why would a surfer type in the URL instead of clicking, when clicking is so much easier? I'm pretty sure anyone who was weird enough to type what they could click could figure out to enter the .com if I used GothicSluts vs. saying GothicSluts.com in the text.

I like varied keywords in the title and body to have some good spider food.

Most importantly, do not post fundamentally the same update over and over like some programs do.

CyberHustler · 11-19-2007, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCyber

Morphing feeds

11-19-2007, 03:26 PM	#1
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	What do you want in RSS blog feeds? What size images do you prefer, how many, ammount of text that sort of thing.....? I want to get this up and running for MaxCash ASAP. Give me your wish list!

11-19-2007, 05:09 PM	#9
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,646	Markhams Magic Join links please __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

11-19-2007, 05:10 PM	#10
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,646	Actually that no url in post is interesting... Never really thought of that before... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

11-19-2007, 05:12 PM	#11
BSleazy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: USA Posts: 6,721	Morphing feeds __________________ icq 156131086

11-19-2007, 09:21 PM	#13
AmeliaG Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 10,568	I like decent sized large-ish pictures and at least a small paragraph of text. I believe an affiliate blog should be a lot like a real blog that way. If someone wants smaller pictures, the code for that is easy, so better to err a bit on the large side. I think most people prefer nonnude or softcore images to be on the safe side. I couldn't care less if the URL is in there. Why would a surfer type in the URL instead of clicking, when clicking is so much easier? I'm pretty sure anyone who was weird enough to type what they could click could figure out to enter the .com if I used GothicSluts vs. saying GothicSluts.com in the text. I like varied keywords in the title and body to have some good spider food. Most importantly, do not post fundamentally the same update over and over like some programs do. __________________ GFY Hall of Famer AltStar Hall of Famer Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com Babe photography portfolio

11-19-2007, 03:39 PM	#2
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	What - Nobody....?

11-19-2007, 03:43 PM	#3
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	Pics max 375 pixels wide. BOLD text for links. long descriptions with keywords relevant to post No sneaking in url or domain name in post for type ins

11-19-2007, 04:03 PM	#5
Stephen Consigliere Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,771	feeds that feature no nudity or lacivious exhibition for those of us that care about 2257

11-19-2007, 04:43 PM	#7
CunningStunt Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,594	Daily / 3 times weekly updates. Well written keyword rich content relevant to the niche. A good paragraph of text at least. Clear images.

11-19-2007, 06:03 PM	#12
ungratefulninja Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 682	Links in the actual post, not just the title as a link.