CIA vs NeoCons? 9/11, Iraq

[xmas13]

Bush Takes On The Firm
Killing the CIA



http://www.spiegel.de/international/...415638,00.html

But despite urgent pressures to report to the contrary, the CIA never reported that Saddam presented an imminent national security threat to the United States, that he was near to developing nuclear weapons, or that he had any ties to al-Qaida. Moreover, analysts predicted a protracted insurgency after an invasion of Iraq. Tenet, despite the lack of cooperation from the CIA's Directorate of Intelligence, acted as backslapper for the administration's policy.

The White House was in a fury. The CIA's professionalism was perceived as political warfare, and the agency apparently was seen as the center of a conspiracy to overthrow the administration. Inside the offices of the president, the vice president and the secretary of defense, the CIA was referred to as a treasonous enemy. "If we lived in a primitive age, the ground at Langley would be laid waste and salted, and there would be heads on spikes," wrote neoconservative columnist David Brooks in the New York Times on Nov. 13, 2004, citing White House officials and "members of the executive branch" as his sources. Reflecting their rage, he called on Bush to "punish the mutineers ... If the C.I.A. pays no price for its behavior, no one will pay a price for anything, and everything is permitted. That, Mr. President, is a slam-dunk."

[spunkmaster]

Didn't Bush say we needed to take out saddam "BEFORE" he because and imminent national security threat to the United States

[buzzy]

Please stop with these awful threads

[2012]

we all know we're fucked ... it gets depressing hearing about it all the time...

go get laid

[yahoo-xxx-girls.com]

xmas13 are you trying to make a point? If not then why not listen to buzzy!

Later,

.