Bomb Iran, majority of Americans says in new poll - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

tblake · 10-30-2007, 04:36 PM

Sheeple! I like that word.

Yes this is getting unsustainable.... it sucks to see the economy start to unravel like this as we "stay the course" to the tune of $200 Billion/yr..

Probono · 10-30-2007, 06:28 PM

If you were feed FOX news 24 hours a day and believe the fantasy of democracy you might still believe in the US government. If you are a realist and understand the axiom is follow the money, like to Hallburton, you might wonder a bit more and start to doubt the flow of propaganda.

GatorB · 10-30-2007, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shok

Just fine

We now own Iraq

Thats like saying owning a Yugo is something. 3800+ dead Americans for a Yugo is not much of a victory to me.

Shok · 10-30-2007, 07:25 PM

3800 in almost 4 years is incredibly low when you think about the situation.

We went to get rid of Sadam, mission accomplished.
Yes we should leave but we are the only thing keeping it somewhat together right now.

If we left tomorrow it would be 10,000 times worse than it is now.

Malicious Biz · 10-30-2007, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Bomb Iran, majority of Americans says in new poll

HELL YEAH! Bomb those motherfuckers I say!

Rochard · 10-30-2007, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

One of the reasons Hitler almost won WWII is because peace movements in Europe prior to the war left Europe weak and vulnerable.

The tide may be turning against Iran. The American people may have more common sense than expected.

Yes, hit Iran and hit them HARD.

I agree.

With Hilter we called it "appeasement". Everyone is bitching about Iraq, but yet from 1991 to 2003 we did nothing but put up with the bullshit while Iraq fired on US warplanes.

But I have a better idea for Iran. Let's do another twenty years of appeasement. Seriously. By then... Their fucking oil will have run out and no one will give a fucking shit about the Middle East.

GreyWolf · 10-30-2007, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

With Hilter we called it "appeasement".

Crap - too dumb and not worth any comment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Everyone is bitching about Iraq, but yet from 1991 to 2003 we did nothing but put up with the bullshit while Iraq fired on US warplanes.

Who says the US can fly over any country without permission?? Nobody. The US (and the UK) just decided they would do that. It has no credibility and there were no "rights" to be there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

But I have a better idea for Iran.

I can't wait to hear.... opinions from dumb US idiots are too common.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Let's do another twenty years of appeasement.

Even better idea - mind your own fucking business and clean your own back yard up. It stinks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

By then... Their fucking oil will have run out and no one will give a fucking shit about the Middle East.

Concern yourself with your own problems and not with the assets of other nations. Start beginning to pay off your debts to other nations and maybe then others will give a "fucking shit" about the US. Tho doubt any competency in doing that.

GatorB · 10-30-2007, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shok

3800 in almost 4 years is incredibly low when you think about the situation.

Tell that to someone who family member died for basically nothing. The Iraqis don't appreciate out sacrifices. Hell they refuse to fight for their own freedom. That's why they took it up the ass from Saddam for 25 years. Any society that refuses to fight for it's own freedom is doomed to failure. Do you think the US would be the country it is today if we allowed the French and Spain do all of our fighting for us durring the Revolution?

Quote:

We went to get rid of Sadam, mission accomplished.

That wasn't the mission idiot. It only became the mission after no WMDs were found.

Quote:

Yes we should leave but we are the only thing keeping it somewhat together right now.

Then why not invade every country that is run by a dictator? Or are Iraqis more deserving of freedom that others? This whole "well we got rid of Saddam" excuse is bullshit.

Quote:

If we left tomorrow it would be 10,000 times worse than it is now.

So? We HAVE to leave someday. We aren't gong to keep forces there for 100 years are we? Fact is there isn't going to be any "best" time to leave. And when we leave the shit is going to hit the fan anyways. Actually prolonging it will make it worse. With your logic we'd still be in viet nam. Your logic is like being in a hopeless marriage, but staying because you're waiting for the "best" time to get a divorce.

GatorB · 10-30-2007, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I agree.

With Hilter we called it "appeasement". Everyone is bitching about Iraq, but yet from 1991 to 2003 we did nothing but put up with the bullshit while Iraq fired on US warplanes.

But I have a better idea for Iran. Let's do another twenty years of appeasement. Seriously. By then... Their fucking oil will have run out and no one will give a fucking shit about the Middle East.

You=RETARD. NO us planes wer shot down after the Gulf War. And we DID actually do something durring those 12 years and it WORKED. WHY wasn't there any WMDs found? Because of the policies enacted by Daddy Bush and continued on by Clinton and it didn't involve invasion. I was 22 when the first Gulf War happned so I have a better perspective on that part of history than you who were most like playing your NES with your elementary school friends.

Hell House Vic · 10-31-2007, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah

And they release these "scientific polls" to gain more support from people sitting on the fence.

exactly!!! thanks for putting it in those words.

SmokeyTheBear · 10-31-2007, 11:38 AM

heres a more recent poll from cnn that shows much different results

CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Oct. 12-14, 2007. N=1,212 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.

.

"If the U.S. government decides to take military action in Iran, would you favor or oppose it?"

.

Favor Oppose Unsure .

% % % .

10/12-14/07
29 68 4 .

5/4-6/07
33 63 4 .

1/19-21/07
26 68 6

so 29% of people would support military action..

------------------------------

some more fodder

Which comes closer to your opinion? Iran is a threat to the United States that requires military action now. Iran is a threat that can be contained with diplomacy now. OR, Iran is not a threat to the United States at this time."

.

Military Action Now 9%
Diplomacy 59%
Not a Threat 24%
unsure 8%
------------------------------------------

gotta love FOX's poll questions.

"Last week the president of Iran said resolutions by the United Nations Security Council could not make Iran give up its nuclear program, saying quote, 'The Iranian nation won't give a damn about such useless resolutions.' Do you think the United Nations should still try diplomacy, or given Iran's defiant rhetoric do you think the United Nations should at a minimum impose economic sanctions on Iran right away?"

.

Still Try
Diplomacy 39%
Impose
Sanctions 51%
Unsure 10%

IllTestYourGirls · 10-31-2007, 12:10 PM

I call BULLSHIT!

Luntz works for Fox

https://youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4

directfiesta · 10-31-2007, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I agree.
while Iraq fired on US warplanes.

That really got to you ... You come back over and over with it, all outraged that Iraq would defend their airspace ....

What were they supposed to do ??? ... Serve you peanuts and get bombed ?

BTW, would the USA fire at warplanes violating their airspace ???

I am pretty sure they would, since they even fired and shot down a civilian airliner not even in their airspace ...

xmas13 · 10-31-2007, 03:30 PM

GreyWolf · 10-31-2007, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

I am pretty sure they would, since they even fired and shot down a civilian airliner not even in their airspace ...

But I'm sure the US apologized profusely and gave an astonishing level of compensation for shooting down Iran Air 655 and killing 300ish people including 60+ children??? No????

BradM · 10-31-2007, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreyWolf

But I'm sure the US apologized profusely and gave an astonishing level of compensation for shooting down Iran Air 655 and killing 300ish people including 60+ children??? No????

Bla bla bla, propoganda. Bla bla bla, uninformed republican bullshit outclause. Bla bla bla, christian horseshit.

And there you have it, a patriots response. Sorry actually typing something rochard or theking etc would say hurts my brain and makes me sad.

GreyWolf · 10-31-2007, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM

Bla bla bla, propoganda. Bla bla bla, uninformed republican bullshit outclause. Bla bla bla, christian horseshit.

And there you have it, a patriots response. Sorry actually typing something rochard or theking etc would say hurts my brain and makes me sad.

You got that down well!

Sorry it hurt your brain...

katushka · 10-31-2007, 04:08 PM

Really, is GFY the place to discuss politics?? Let's compare bra sizes!

GreyWolf · 10-31-2007, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katushka

Really, is GFY the place to discuss politics?? Let's compare bra sizes!

Is that what it is katushka - politics? GFY can sometimes reach below the level of politics into a quagmire swamp where the mentally ill live - but, they can't help it

Sadly I'm only at my trainer bra stage, but got huge ambitions

stev0 · 10-31-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

One of the reasons Hitler almost won WWII is because peace movements in Europe prior to the war left Europe weak and vulnerable.

The tide may be turning against Iran. The American people may have more common sense than expected.

Yes, hit Iran and hit them HARD.

You're an idiot

Have you ever thought about taking a look at the reasons behind terrorist attacks in the US and Israel? And no, it's not because they "hate freedom".

CosmicTang · 10-31-2007, 04:24 PM

our foreign policy is so fucked.

Persius · 10-31-2007, 06:12 PM

ww3 .......

xmas13 · 10-31-2007, 06:41 PM

Bomb America, majority of Iranians will say in a future poll

.............

...................

.........................

Los Angeles 2025

New York City 2025

Chicago 2025

Washington 2025

GregE · 10-31-2007, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Persius

ww3 .......

Yup.

But not for the reasons you think.

The USA will not bomb Iran, Iran will get their own bomb (eventually) and they will use it (probably on Israel).

That is when you'll get your "ww3"

buzzy · 10-31-2007, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE

Yup.

But not for the reasons you think.

The USA will not bomb Iran, Iran will get their own bomb (eventually) and they will use it (probably on Israel).

That is when you'll get your "ww3"

I didn't know so many GFY'ers worked for the iranian intelligence services

xmas13 · 10-31-2007, 06:53 PM

Hell House Vic · 11-01-2007, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13

CRO-MAGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AGE OF QUARREL!!!!!!!!!!

10-30-2007, 04:36 PM	#51
tblake Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 157	Sheeple! I like that word. Yes this is getting unsustainable.... it sucks to see the economy start to unravel like this as we "stay the course" to the tune of $200 Billion/yr.. __________________ Travis - XBIZ p: 310-820-0228 ex 703 ICQ: 390-705-165 [email protected] XBIZ.COM \| XBIZ World \| XBIZ VIDEO My Adult Who's Who Profile

10-31-2007, 11:38 AM	#61
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	heres a more recent poll from cnn that shows much different results CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. Oct. 12-14, 2007. N=1,212 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3. . "If the U.S. government decides to take military action in Iran, would you favor or oppose it?" . Favor Oppose Unsure . % % % . 10/12-14/07 29 68 4 . 5/4-6/07 33 63 4 . 1/19-21/07 26 68 6 so 29% of people would support military action.. ------------------------------ some more fodder Which comes closer to your opinion? Iran is a threat to the United States that requires military action now. Iran is a threat that can be contained with diplomacy now. OR, Iran is not a threat to the United States at this time." . Military Action Now 9% Diplomacy 59% Not a Threat 24% unsure 8% ------------------------------------------ gotta love FOX's poll questions. "Last week the president of Iran said resolutions by the United Nations Security Council could not make Iran give up its nuclear program, saying quote, 'The Iranian nation won't give a damn about such useless resolutions.' Do you think the United Nations should still try diplomacy, or given Iran's defiant rhetoric do you think the United Nations should at a minimum impose economic sanctions on Iran right away?" . Still Try Diplomacy 39% Impose Sanctions 51% Unsure 10% __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

10-31-2007, 12:10 PM	#62
IllTestYourGirls Ah My Balls Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421 Posts: 14,311	I call BULLSHIT! Luntz works for Fox https://youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4 __________________

10-31-2007, 04:08 PM	#68
katushka Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tujunga, CA Posts: 163	Really, is GFY the place to discuss politics?? Let's compare bra sizes! __________________ http://users.adultspace.com/katushka/ http://www.datingdollar.com/ (COMING SOON) ICQ: 423165077 Contact me...let's chat

10-31-2007, 04:24 PM	#71
CosmicTang Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,478	our foreign policy is so fucked. __________________ ICQ: 456.689.835 julian (at) orgasm (dot) com

10-30-2007, 06:28 PM	#52
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	If you were feed FOX news 24 hours a day and believe the fantasy of democracy you might still believe in the US government. If you are a realist and understand the axiom is follow the money, like to Hallburton, you might wonder a bit more and start to doubt the flow of propaganda.

10-30-2007, 07:25 PM	#54
Shok Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: LIVE EVIL Posts: 5,611	3800 in almost 4 years is incredibly low when you think about the situation. We went to get rid of Sadam, mission accomplished. Yes we should leave but we are the only thing keeping it somewhat together right now. If we left tomorrow it would be 10,000 times worse than it is now.

10-31-2007, 03:30 PM	#64
xmas13 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GFY Posts: 5,176

10-31-2007, 06:12 PM	#72
Persius Tap into MOBILE! Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Hollywood Posts: 11,779	ww3 .......

10-31-2007, 06:41 PM	#73
xmas13 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GFY Posts: 5,176	Bomb America, majority of Iranians will say in a future poll ............. ................... ......................... Los Angeles 2025 New York City 2025 Chicago 2025 Washington 2025 Last edited by xmas13; 10-31-2007 at 06:42 PM..

10-31-2007, 06:53 PM	#76
xmas13 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: GFY Posts: 5,176