![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Prague
Posts: 740
|
Traffic trading scripts
Ive been running a tgp on ucj for the better part of 6 years now, slow and steady growth, no complaints, never had a problem with ucj.
I hear a lot of people call ucj a dinosaur, etc etc. It works for me but I am beginning to wonder if perhaps I am missing out. That perhaps I could improve my traffic trading ability/quality more if I went with a different script such as ATX. I tried tm3 a couple years ago but didnt like it and I would hate to sink another $400 into a script that I just end up scrapping. All trade scripts revolve around the same basic concept for the most part. Measure the incoming traffics productivity and return to trades accordingly, correct? What makes UCJs ability to do this effectively any different than say ATX? ATX states "ATX has been given Artificial Intelligence, a virtual brain, that learns from the past, and then changes the way traffic is being returned to your trades, in such a way that gives maximum growth." Which is completely ambiguous and explains nothing. Can anyone explain to me in less ambiguous terms why ATX is better than UCJ? If you have used UCJ and moved to ATX in the past did you see a major difference? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |