President Bush warned today that Iran would be raising the risk of a ?World War III? - GoFuckYourself.com

Azoy? · 10-17-2007, 10:35 PM

OK. It's official. Bush lost it. The guy is talking about WW3. Does this guy love war or what ? I wonder if he would be so into wards if his kids were in the military or sent oversees in the military.
Why can't he try to at least make an effort to negotiate. Even when the US was in the cold war with the USSR, former US Presidents spoke with them trying to work with them the arms race.

The story below can be found here.

WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — President Bush warned today that Iran would be raising the risk of a “World War III” if it came to possess nuclear weapons.
And he said he believed that Russia still wanted to stop Iran from developing such weapons.

Those comments, made during a far-ranging 45-minute news conference, came as reporters sought the president’s reaction to a warning on Tuesday by President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia against any military strikes on Iran to halt the nuclear work that it has continued in defiance of much of the world. Iran contends that its nuclear program is purely peaceful.

WWC · 10-17-2007, 10:39 PM

halfpint · 10-17-2007, 10:43 PM

Yep heard the same over here on the BBC

Bush has really lost the plot

cheapgallerydesign · 10-17-2007, 10:43 PM

As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees.

It does disturb me that he would speak of the possibility of a global instability brought on by Iran creating nukes by using the term "World War 3". I don't know, we all know it's a possible scenario but it seems that someone in his position should pick and choose his words a little more carefully. He has never been known for his suave diplomatic characteristics though

minusonebit · 10-18-2007, 12:13 AM

I need to call my attorney in the morning and get a legal opinion on whether or not its permissible to render lifeless a political, uhm, "leader" who is undertaking a series of actions that have a good likelihood of killing me and everyone else here when someone pushes the big red button and launches a nuke. Self defense could apply here, am I right or am I right?

eroswebmaster · 10-18-2007, 12:21 AM

I started stocking up with tuna fish sandwiches over 5 years ago.

flashfire · 10-18-2007, 12:23 AM

thanks for the end of the world you retards that voted for this waste of skin

who · 10-18-2007, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheapgallerydesign

As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees.

What makes you say that Iran is a 'rogue' country? Fox news? Tell me one trait of Iran which makes it a rogue country, which is a trait that USA doesn't also possess.

thonglife · 10-18-2007, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Tell me one trait of Iran which makes it a rogue country, which is a trait that USA doesn't also possess.

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2001/nea/8251.htm

Here's a whole bunch of traits.

DWB · 10-18-2007, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thonglife

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2001/nea/8251.htm

Here's a whole bunch of traits.

Does anyone list the atrocities the USA has committed? It's gonna be a lot longer that Iran's I can assure you.

cykoe6 · 10-18-2007, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheapgallerydesign

As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees.

Thanks for injecting a small amount of reason into an otherwise typically idiotic political thread on GFY.

VicD · 10-18-2007, 06:09 AM

peace does not excist, it's preparation time for the next war...

Joe BrainCash · 10-18-2007, 06:14 AM

when does bush leave again?

After Shock Media · 10-18-2007, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheapgallerydesign

As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees.

Cough India Cough Pakistan Cough Israel Cough.

SilentKnight · 10-18-2007, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minusonebit

I need to call my attorney in the morning and get a legal opinion on whether or not its permissible to render lifeless a political, uhm, "leader" who is undertaking a series of actions that have a good likelihood of killing me and everyone else here when someone pushes the big red button and launches a nuke. Self defense could apply here, am I right or am I right?

As they say - the best defense is a strong offense.

Although highly unlikely you'd find much support in the legal community, from a logical, self-preservation standpoint it makes very good sense.

Insane times we live in.

gaymale · 10-18-2007, 07:29 AM

You know if Nancy Pelosi had balls (which we know she doesn't) she would have started impeachement procdures the same day she was sworn in. Isn't it enough that we invaded a foreign country without a declaration of war, under false pretenses, murdered almost 4,000 of our own people by sending more and more fo them there, murder our allies children, husbands, wifes, daughter and sons, murdered innocent Iraquis (yes there are inoocent ones) and try to put the blame for all this on someone else? Now he has started getting 8 combat troops ready for war, under the same false pretense it's just to get them combat ready. Combat ready for what? Iran? Russia? England? Hell with Bush you never know. Maybe he should send all his croonies who have been found out to be crooks (Gonzales, etc.) into combat and his two drunk daughters to work in a hospis to show the American people true patriotism, and while you're at it, include Cheney's daughter and Cheney, he seems to have a good aim while hunting, his friend can attest to that. You know Hitler came to power in the same manner, convincing his people that he was just protecting his people.

buzzy · 10-18-2007, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thonglife

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2001/nea/8251.htm

Here's a whole bunch of traits.

Hmm ever heard of sharia law? You know, the one that saudi arabia uses, the same country that the usa has its dick in.

Also I don't know why everyone is presuming Iran is building nukes, when they clearly aren't.

ShellyCrash · 10-18-2007, 07:40 AM

Why does he say shit like this. Can't they put a gag on him? Just a little more than 1 year left, if we can make it that long.

Azoy? · 10-18-2007, 08:00 AM

would be interesting to see what the end result will be once he leaves office.
i bet you will see a lot of cheers and tomatoes thrown at his take away car.
he's really a big fuck tard.

pornguy · 10-18-2007, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheapgallerydesign

As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees.

It does disturb me that he would speak of the possibility of a global instability brought on by Iran creating nukes by using the term "World War 3". I don't know, we all know it's a possible scenario but it seems that someone in his position should pick and choose his words a little more carefully. He has never been known for his suave diplomatic characteristics though

Sadly the UN does what ever the US says, so it is US policy.

sltr · 10-18-2007, 08:10 AM

iran would be raising the risk of ww3 if they build nuclear weapons.

ADL Colin · 10-18-2007, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azoy?

Even when the US was in the cold war with the USSR, former US Presidents spoke with them trying to work with them the arms race.

You just reminded me of this amusing soundcheck by Reagan

"My fellow Americans, I've just signed legislation outlawing Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes." - Ronald Reagan

JFK · 10-18-2007, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rock'n'porn

when does bush leave again?

unfortunately we are stuck with the War Monger idiot for a bit yet

[ScreaM] · 10-18-2007, 08:40 AM

He is a fucking moron.

Argoz · 10-18-2007, 08:42 AM

Thanks Bush.....

DaddyHalbucks · 10-18-2007, 08:52 AM

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

Bush hasn't "lost it."

You've lost it.

Barefootsies · 10-18-2007, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azoy?

Does this guy love war or what ?

I am sure he has plenty of kickbacks from his corporate chums who are making billions off of the bullshit wars.

War is big business. With Bush and the Republicans in the white house. Business is good.

sumphatpimp · 10-18-2007, 09:00 AM

you gonna get drafted.
then you gonna get rapped.

Andy Servers4Less · 10-18-2007, 09:04 AM

Yeah its not looking good. Better get a good, reliable host that can withstand WWIII

hardcoreblogger · 10-18-2007, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheapgallerydesign

Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes.

The US of A are a much more dangerous rogue country currently than Iran. Compare the atrocities and the damage done to the world in recent years...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

LOL yeah sure, same like good ole Saddam bombed all your cities right? Same old lame excuse, supported by lots of lies from bush's cronies again.

Jon B · 10-18-2007, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Cough India Cough Pakistan Cough Israel Cough.

Hmmm which one of these threatened to wipe Israel and the US off the map?
That would be Iran.
And I didn't vote for Bush I think he cheated to win the election...But it's too late now.

DjiXas · 10-18-2007, 09:13 AM

Go Bush!

http://ihatehate.files.wordpress.com...-as-hitler.jpg

BlackCrayon · 10-18-2007, 09:15 AM

Someone should invent something that would render all nuclear weapons useless while still being able to use nuclear technology for peaceful uses.

BlackCrayon · 10-18-2007, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

Bush hasn't "lost it."

You've lost it.

Think before you speak. If Iran nuked israel it would surely effect them as well. This is all just a big dick contest.

Barefootsies · 10-18-2007, 09:21 AM

Fear mongering...

Listen ladies, the name of this game is 'the most commited wins'. Since they are willing to trade their lives for what they believe in. They will win.

That's right.

Buckle your seatbelt Dorothy. They will win.

They are smaller. Faster. More agile. Do not require vast amounts of money. Only transportation and a target. The fact all these asshats think they can stop anything is insane. I honestly do not know which is worse. The fool, or those who follow them.

minusonebit · 10-18-2007, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

I honestly do not know which is worse. The fool, or those who follow them.

The followers are worse, by far. The fool would not get anything done if he did not have any followers.

leedsfan · 10-18-2007, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

As they say - the best defense is a strong offense.

Although highly unlikely you'd find much support in the legal community, from a logical, self-preservation standpoint it makes very good sense.

Insane times we live in.

So logically instigating WW3 is simply good offense?

Global nuclear war and self preservation-two themes that don't gel well for obvious reasons.

buzzy · 10-18-2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

Bush hasn't "lost it."

You've lost it.

Is it really possible to be this naive?

Tom_PM · 10-18-2007, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

Bush hasn't "lost it."

You've lost it.

I think the argument is over: confront. In what way should we confront Iran?

and really, the issue was Bush's self admited lack of speaking skills. Saying the phrase "world war 3" in ANY context for any president or prime minister is just stupid. Bush is just stupid in front of a camera, we all know it and can get over it. But it still can be damaging.

The longer he stays in office, the more I see the reason why he does so few appearances in front of the general population.

I mean shit, if his people didnt put him in front of only pre-screened republican or military (re: "pro-bush") audiences, he'd be on the news constantly with his foot directly in his mouth.

DaddyHalbucks · 10-18-2007, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy

Is it really possible to be this naive?

Sure it is. Remember 9/ 10/ 2001?

What's your excuse today?

buzzy · 10-18-2007, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Sure it is. Remember 9/ 10/ 2001?

What's your excuse today?

Because that was carried out by iranians, right. Nope, saudis.

Tom_PM · 10-18-2007, 10:23 AM

9/10/2001?

In those days Bush was known as the US President with the most vacation days ever for any president in history. Remember the $300 tax refund? He was known for that too.

pornask · 10-18-2007, 10:25 AM

There is only one country in the world with proven record of (ab)use of nuclear weapons against civilians!

sublimed · 10-18-2007, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran?

Bush hasn't "lost it."

You've lost it.

If we weren't over fucking with Iraq and sticking our noses where they don't belong no I don't think America would be getting nuked any time soon. So you want to confront Iran? what are you going to say when we do and if we find out they never where doing anything of the sort, just like Iraq? yet we kill thousands and thousands of people to accomplish what? Nothing! yeah you sir are a genius that's why you voted for Bush in the first place. Anyone who voted for this moron should have their name put on a wall somewhere to remember the greedy fucks who thought Bush was going to make them more money while he was in office so they voted him in.

Greed.

Jimmy Rock · 10-18-2007, 10:37 AM

This lin ethe in the article is funny:
“If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it’d be a dangerous threat to world peace,” Mr. Bush said.
I like how they wrote MR. Bush and not president. I prefer it that way

DaddyHalbucks · 10-18-2007, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy

Because that was carried out by iranians, right. Nope, saudis.

Does the exact flavor matter? Islamofascism is Islamofascism.

It seems you are splitting hairs.

Al Qaeda and Iran have both threatened Israel and the US. Iran is directly fomenting violence in Iraq by providing weapons and support to the terrorists who are killing US troops.

If 9/11 didn't wake you up, what scale of catastrophe would be necessary to wake you up? If an American or Israeli city were nuked, would you then agree there is a problem?

"Woops, sorry about those 250,000 Americans or Israelis who died by that Iranian nuke. We had no idea this was coming" --if you were the President of the US, could you really say that with a straight face?" In this were the situation, then you'd definitely be talking about an incompetent President.

If Al Qaeda actually detonated the nuke, but Iran had supplied it, would that hair splitting distinction make any difference at all? No, not the slightest.

In the wake of 9/11, you'd have to be stupid not to take these threats seriously.

Hats off to GWB for his efforts to try to make our country safe and to export freedom around the globe.

The haters?

Well, they can

DaddyHalbucks · 10-18-2007, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornask

There is only one country in the world with proven record of (ab)use of nuclear weapons against civilians!

If you are implying it is the US, then you are completely ignorant of history.

buzzy · 10-18-2007, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Does the exact flavor matter? Islamofascism is Islamofascism.

It seems you are splitting hairs.

Al Qaeda and Iran have both threatened Israel and the US. Iran is directly fomenting violence in Iraq by providing weapons and support to the terrorists who are killing US troops.

If 9/11 didn't wake you up, what scale of catastrophe would be necessary to wake you up? If an American or Israeli city were nuked, would you then agree there is a problem?

"Woops, sorry about those 250,000 Americans or Israelis who died by that Iranian nuke. We had no idea this was coming" --if you were the President of the US, could you really say that with a straight face?" In this were the situation, then you'd definitely be talking about an incompetent President.

If Al Qaeda actually detonated the nuke, but Iran had supplied it, would that hair splitting distinction make any difference at all? No, not the slightest.

In the wake of 9/11, you'd have to be stupid not to take these threats seriously.

Hats off to GWB for his efforts to try to make our country safe and to export freedom around the globe.

The haters?

Well, they can

Hmmm. Iran havent threatened Israel, see here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud...jad_and_Israel

So what if iran is supplying weapons in iraq (even though they aren't) but lets assume they are, just fighting off the illegal occupation in that country.

The international atomic energy agency have said multiple times that iran aren;t building nukes, who would you rather believe, them or bush? I know who im believing.

Iran would never supply weapons to any Sunni group, let alone al qaeda, they are big enemies.

Your propaganda dosent wash with me pal, try it on someone else but at the end of the day your in the minoirty so

frostyimpressions · 10-18-2007, 11:22 AM

It was nice knowing all of you

yahoo-xxx-girls.com · 10-18-2007, 11:28 AM

Azoy? did you actually read the article?

.

10-17-2007, 10:35 PM	#1
Azoy? Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 2,178	President Bush warned today that Iran would be raising the risk of a ?World War III? OK. It's official. Bush lost it. The guy is talking about WW3. Does this guy love war or what ? I wonder if he would be so into wards if his kids were in the military or sent oversees in the military. Why can't he try to at least make an effort to negotiate. Even when the US was in the cold war with the USSR, former US Presidents spoke with them trying to work with them the arms race. The story below can be found here. WASHINGTON, Oct. 17 — President Bush warned today that Iran would be raising the risk of a “World War III” if it came to possess nuclear weapons. And he said he believed that Russia still wanted to stop Iran from developing such weapons. Those comments, made during a far-ranging 45-minute news conference, came as reporters sought the president’s reaction to a warning on Tuesday by President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia against any military strikes on Iran to halt the nuclear work that it has continued in defiance of much of the world. Iran contends that its nuclear program is purely peaceful. Last edited by Azoy?; 10-17-2007 at 10:37 PM..

10-17-2007, 10:39 PM	#2
WWC #1 Adult Content Provider Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Glendale, Ca Posts: 11,577	__________________ [email protected] ICQ : 494-353-230 Follow WWC on Twitter CLICK HERE! " CONTENT PROVIDER OF THE YEAR! " ~ 2007 , 2008 & 2009 XBIZ AWARDS WINNER! .......www.WorldWideContent.com / www.WorldWideFeeds.com...... WWC Nominated " Content Licensor of The Year " 2010 XBiz Awards !!!

10-17-2007, 10:43 PM	#3
halfpint GFY's Halfpint Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 15,223	Yep heard the same over here on the BBC Bush has really lost the plot __________________ Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

10-18-2007, 12:21 AM	#6
eroswebmaster March 1st, 2003 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seat 4 @ Venetian Poker Room Posts: 20,295	I started stocking up with tuna fish sandwiches over 5 years ago. __________________ For rent - ICQ 127-027-910 Click here for more details

10-18-2007, 06:14 AM	#13
Joe BrainCash Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Boy, life is difficult... Posts: 2,092	when does bush leave again? __________________ [email protected] ICQ: 394.549.466

10-17-2007, 10:43 PM	#4
cheapgallerydesign So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 380	As much as I hate Dubya, he has a point. Rogue & unstable countries such as Iran would be escalating a risk to the entire world if they were to possess nukes. This is not just the US policy. This is UN policy. The majority of the planet agrees. It does disturb me that he would speak of the possibility of a global instability brought on by Iran creating nukes by using the term "World War 3". I don't know, we all know it's a possible scenario but it seems that someone in his position should pick and choose his words a little more carefully. He has never been known for his suave diplomatic characteristics though

10-18-2007, 12:13 AM	#5
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	I need to call my attorney in the morning and get a legal opinion on whether or not its permissible to render lifeless a political, uhm, "leader" who is undertaking a series of actions that have a good likelihood of killing me and everyone else here when someone pushes the big red button and launches a nuke. Self defense could apply here, am I right or am I right?

10-18-2007, 12:23 AM	#7
flashfire ICQ 1 6 7 8 5 3 4 9 2 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 13,098	thanks for the end of the world you retards that voted for this waste of skin

10-18-2007, 06:09 AM	#12
VicD ICQ: 304-611-162 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Masterdam Posts: 13,245	peace does not excist, it's preparation time for the next war...

10-18-2007, 07:29 AM	#16
gaymale Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: East Bay California Posts: 234	You know if Nancy Pelosi had balls (which we know she doesn't) she would have started impeachement procdures the same day she was sworn in. Isn't it enough that we invaded a foreign country without a declaration of war, under false pretenses, murdered almost 4,000 of our own people by sending more and more fo them there, murder our allies children, husbands, wifes, daughter and sons, murdered innocent Iraquis (yes there are inoocent ones) and try to put the blame for all this on someone else? Now he has started getting 8 combat troops ready for war, under the same false pretense it's just to get them combat ready. Combat ready for what? Iran? Russia? England? Hell with Bush you never know. Maybe he should send all his croonies who have been found out to be crooks (Gonzales, etc.) into combat and his two drunk daughters to work in a hospis to show the American people true patriotism, and while you're at it, include Cheney's daughter and Cheney, he seems to have a good aim while hunting, his friend can attest to that. You know Hitler came to power in the same manner, convincing his people that he was just protecting his people. __________________ Submit your website at: and

10-18-2007, 07:40 AM	#18
ShellyCrash Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Posts: 6,708	Why does he say shit like this. Can't they put a gag on him? Just a little more than 1 year left, if we can make it that long. __________________ Start making money with the hottest hookup site! up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare ICQ 196766477

10-18-2007, 08:00 AM	#19
Azoy? Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 2,178	would be interesting to see what the end result will be once he leaves office. i bet you will see a lot of cheers and tomatoes thrown at his take away car. he's really a big fuck tard.

10-18-2007, 08:10 AM	#21
sltr Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,191	iran would be raising the risk of ww3 if they build nuclear weapons.

10-18-2007, 08:40 AM	#24
[ScreaM] Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,664	He is a fucking moron.

10-18-2007, 08:42 AM	#25
Argoz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Qc Posts: 3,006	Thanks Bush..... __________________ rssEVOLUTION : Produce a FULL website with ANY RSS feed(s) in seconds. contentSOLUTION : Allowing you to automatically grab articles from article directories, import as many text files as you want at once, grab ANY content from ANY RSS feed, and scrape search engines, instantly.

10-18-2007, 08:52 AM	#26
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Do you idiots really think we should wait until an Israeli or American city is nuked before we confront Iran? Bush hasn't "lost it." You've lost it. __________________ Boner Money

10-18-2007, 09:00 AM	#28
sumphatpimp Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 5,235	you gonna get drafted. then you gonna get rapped.

10-18-2007, 09:04 AM	#29
Andy Servers4Less Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 922	Yeah its not looking good. Better get a good, reliable host that can withstand WWIII __________________ Andy Servers4Less www.ServersForLess.com ICQ: 412-203-056 DUAL QUAD CORES W/100 Mbps UNMETERED- $799/ month!!

10-18-2007, 09:13 AM	#32
DjiXas So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 1,108	Go Bush! http://ihatehate.files.wordpress.com...-as-hitler.jpg

10-18-2007, 09:15 AM	#33
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	Someone should invent something that would render all nuclear weapons useless while still being able to use nuclear technology for peaceful uses. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

10-18-2007, 09:21 AM	#35
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Fear mongering... Listen ladies, the name of this game is 'the most commited wins'. Since they are willing to trade their lives for what they believe in. They will win. That's right. Buckle your seatbelt Dorothy. They will win. They are smaller. Faster. More agile. Do not require vast amounts of money. Only transportation and a target. The fact all these asshats think they can stop anything is insane. I honestly do not know which is worse. The fool, or those who follow them. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

10-18-2007, 10:23 AM	#42
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	9/10/2001? In those days Bush was known as the US President with the most vacation days ever for any president in history. Remember the $300 tax refund? He was known for that too. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

10-18-2007, 10:25 AM	#43
pornask So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: 253-233-241 Posts: 6,518	There is only one country in the world with proven record of (ab)use of nuclear weapons against civilians!

10-18-2007, 10:37 AM	#45
Jimmy Rock Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: West Hollywood Posts: 3,055	This lin ethe in the article is funny: “If Iran had a nuclear weapon, it’d be a dangerous threat to world peace,” Mr. Bush said. I like how they wrote MR. Bush and not president. I prefer it that way __________________ Jimmy Rock \| ICQ: 285 748 329 [email protected]

10-18-2007, 11:22 AM	#49
frostyimpressions Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 918	It was nice knowing all of you __________________ Lisa

10-18-2007, 11:28 AM	#50
yahoo-xxx-girls.com Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 3,143	Azoy? did you actually read the article? . __________________ sig too big