![]() |
Damn this all sux...
|
Quote:
So, your dreamweaver is secure in uploading files? |
Quote:
I have no problems dumping WS FTP, I was only using the LE edition anyway, and it was bad. If anyone can confirm that the PRO version is any better, then please let me know. The makers of WS FTP sure cannot tell me the differences, so I must assume they are minimal, and thus they have given me no reason to buy it. |
Quote:
My damned password was being transmitted over the net 50 times a day... this was a bomb waiting to explode; it was bound to happen. You all should think about this. |
Quote:
So... to recap... 4 FTPing, use SFTP 4 TELNETing, use SSH or SSH2 anything else while it's on your mind? |
ok i am bout to get a headache,,
my lack of server knowledge and this thread is scaring me |
Quote:
Yes, DreamweaverMX has a SSH plugin called PUTTY that is secure. I'm not sure about the ealier versions. |
Quote:
The lesson here is if you are insecure, you will eventually get hacked... it is only a matter of time. |
PuTTy :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
SSH is much better then Telnet. Get rid of telnet and stick with ssh.
KD |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's funny that I was jus telling the makers of WS FTP LE all the bugs in the program that I hate (like it's inability to deal with files that have a space in them, and some other problems I have mentioned in this thread), and I told the girl that I would never purchase the PRO version unless it had fixed these bugs. She couldn't tell me if it had or not... just that it was 'better', and that I shouldn't judge the PRO version of the software based on the LE edition. ....ok. How about I rate you, then... :321GFY |
anyone know anything about FlashFXP? If so, is it ok to use? :helpme
|
I don't believe it, why do people have to hack? I mean seriously what's the point? Is there some dood sitting in his "speacial hacking chair" giggling to...himself? I can see it now.
"Muhahaha, those jerks! I'll teach them to overload me with banners and pop-ups! Muhahaha" Somebody needs to move out of his mom's basement |
Some hackers (as opposed to crackers) do it for the thrill and to show people what could happen... I hope to god that this dude did this to me to show me the flaws of the net. But, he didnt show me how he did it, I just figured it was via sniffing since I just found out that I had all of this insecurities with my setup. But, maybe he was just trying to show that my server was not hack-proof, in fact, it was easily hackable, and thus I have a better server now, and it won't happen to me again (this easily, anyway). So, for that, I thank the guy. I also thank him for not running "rm *" heh.... yeah.
|
Quote:
|
roflmao :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you haven't tried F-Secure yet, I'd suggest checking it out... They have a free download and trial and I think you'll really like their File Transfer utility better than WS_FTP... |
How do I protect my outlook-using, plain-text-sending, pop3-protocoling server-downloading email-checking?
|
Quote:
Yes, I know you have to refresh after everything - another reason why WS FTP sucks. Once you change a file, and upload it, the timestamp is the same, so when you change the file again, and reupload it, it thinks you are overwritten the file with the same file, and gives that stupid message (are you sure?)... very annoying. I know this can be turned off, but I don't want it to be - to make sure I don't do anything stupid. The window should simply refresh so this function works 100% of the time. I will try F-secure, thank you. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123