GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Sites Like Megarotic.com will Kill This Biz Once and For all (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=774926)

ultimatebbwdotcom 10-08-2007 06:13 PM

Only the French give up that easy.

Iron Fist 10-08-2007 06:26 PM

Can someone explain to me why when I see a TGP "directory" site, listing every FHG from every sponsor in that niche, isn't "stealing" content as well? All im seeing if they are just importing every FHG movie on the site and making it searchable. Big deal really.

tony286 10-08-2007 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead (Post 13208180)
Can someone explain to me why when I see a TGP "directory" site, listing every FHG from every sponsor in that niche, isn't "stealing" content as well? All im seeing if they are just importing every FHG movie on the site and making it searchable. Big deal really.

No FHG has 20 min movie clips

d-null 10-08-2007 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2 (Post 13207802)
People saying to "adapt" in this scenario are idiots

If I give away free pirated copies of Windows Vista every time you buy a portable flash drive from me...does that mean Microsoft needs to "adapt", or does Microsoft need to find a way to shut me down to protect their intellectual property rights?

nicely said

Kevin Marx 10-08-2007 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead (Post 13208180)
Can someone explain to me why when I see a TGP "directory" site, listing every FHG from every sponsor in that niche, isn't "stealing" content as well? All im seeing if they are just importing every FHG movie on the site and making it searchable. Big deal really.

Free Hosted Galleries are populated with marketing materials (content I have deemed appropriate to use to market) rather than complete sets.

If the pictures on an FHG have been removed from the members section to populate the FHG, that would be considered stolen content, but your example is not. The pictures in those are legit.

Snake Doctor 10-09-2007 10:02 AM

http://www.amateurcleavage.com/gfy/bump.gif

Drake 10-09-2007 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13207698)
maybe these sites are a symptom and not a disease. It is obvious that the value of generic porn video is declining, there is much higher value placed in live interaction products: cams, dating, etc.

In other words, consumer demand (in $$) for boring been-there-done-that porn is relatively low while consumer demand for hot 19 year old chicks getting naked on webcam, or finding some dirty 20 year old slut in your neighbourhood is high.

Just a theory. Don't lynch me.

I think the demand for generic porn is as strong as it always has been. Only it's value has declined because it is available freely. The difference with cams and dating is that they can't be 'stolen'. You actually have to register on a dating site if you want to meet people and register on a cam site if you want to see live cams. That type of content can't simply be uploaded and made readily available for everybody.

Drake 10-09-2007 10:21 AM

Tubes are not comparable to TGPs or MGPs. One provides short samples, the other gets you entire members areas worth of content. I don't think there is any easy way to 'adapt'. But I also don't see tubes going away any time soon.

TheStout 10-09-2007 10:22 AM

LOL...Does anyone have a link to a music thread in 2001 or a movie thread in 2003? I forget who posted it but I remember it well, "Hoiw many of you have paid for that Adobe Photoshop you are using on your computer right now?". Get used to it because it is not going to slow down.

IMO

Dollarmansteve 10-09-2007 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 13210698)
I think the demand for generic porn is as strong as it always has been. Only it's value has declined because it is available freely. The difference with cams and dating is that they can't be 'stolen'. You actually have to register on a dating site if you want to meet people and register on a cam site if you want to see live cams. That type of content can't simply be uploaded and made readily available for everybody.

The demand for porn is highly elastic (ie price sensitive). At a price point of zero demand approaches infinity.

What I was saying was the the relative demand is weak. For example, people will pay $2.99 per minute to chat with some hot slut on a webcam and spend $200 chatting. But, trying to get $200 out of a consumer to show them DVD porn is difficult. So, the 'tube' sites or whatever you want to call them have recognized this.. using the free porn (which has infinite demand) to push traffic to high-value sites.

TheStout 10-09-2007 10:43 AM

I agree with DollarmanSteve...He is smart

hateman 10-09-2007 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ (Post 13207465)
Finally 1 guy got it right.

Brad Mitchell. Thanks for explaining to the idiot's how the industry can and will move to Video sites. I been at it for months now trying to drill into these dimwits heads that it is a matter of change.

Thumbs up to Mojo Host!
Piracy will slow down drastically as Piracy on a video site makes the business model faulty altogether. They need money to and piracy on the sites is nothing more than a bandwidth drain that makes hosting pirated content unafforable.

Why do you even care? You are a broke ass idiot who cant even sell a design.


Dont worry, sucking dicks for money will always be hip.

pocketkangaroo 10-09-2007 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 13210726)
Tubes are not comparable to TGPs or MGPs. One provides short samples, the other gets you entire members areas worth of content. I don't think there is any easy way to 'adapt'. But I also don't see tubes going away any time soon.

Which tube sites have entire members areas?

Brad Mitchell 10-09-2007 11:36 AM

Good thread, keep it going :) Really appreciate your insight Steve, it's right on.

Brad

Snake Doctor 10-09-2007 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 13210821)
The demand for porn is highly elastic (ie price sensitive). At a price point of zero demand approaches infinity.

What I was saying was the the relative demand is weak. For example, people will pay $2.99 per minute to chat with some hot slut on a webcam and spend $200 chatting. But, trying to get $200 out of a consumer to show them DVD porn is difficult. So, the 'tube' sites or whatever you want to call them have recognized this.. using the free porn (which has infinite demand) to push traffic to high-value sites.

Ok I see your point, but when did theft become part of a viable business model?
IF these sites had to pay for licensing rights to use the content in this way, their profit would be gone. (because standard licenses don't allow content to be used in this way, so they would have to negotiate a broader, much more expensive license)
Also, MOST of the content that they're using isn't available for license, it's owned exclusively by the paysite. This is content they would never have on their site were they to obey the law (and if they did have it, it would be in much smaller amounts and not used to promote other products)

This would never be a viable business model if they weren't stealing content, and the fact that you're basically saying the theives are smarter than those of us that play by the rules is a little insulting. :2 cents:

Dollarmansteve 10-09-2007 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2 (Post 13211147)
Ok I see your point, but when did theft become part of a viable business model?
IF these sites had to pay for licensing rights to use the content in this way, their profit would be gone. (because standard licenses don't allow content to be used in this way, so they would have to negotiate a broader, much more expensive license)
Also, MOST of the content that they're using isn't available for license, it's owned exclusively by the paysite. This is content they would never have on their site were they to obey the law (and if they did have it, it would be in much smaller amounts and not used to promote other products)

This would never be a viable business model if they weren't stealing content, and the fact that you're basically saying the theives are smarter than those of us that play by the rules is a little insulting. :2 cents:

Clearly the 'right answer' is somewhere in the middle. The only point I was trying to make is that there is a 'value scale' of content - non-exlcusive porn video is low on that value scale (and is in decline), and interactive, x-rated webcam chat is high onthe value scale. These existnce of tube sites are an extreme example of this disparity.

Forgetting these sites for a second, can we not agree that there is less willingness on the part of consumers to pay for normal, non-exclusive video? The market is commoditized and not because of the tube sites, I mean there are lots of sites out there where you can download thousands and thousands of DVDs with no DRM for less than $10 a month....

I don't personally believe the these types of sites are the disease, I believe they are a symptom, but that is just my :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123