|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 702
|
designers - where do you draw the line?
When making any web page, in this case i'll refer to an average paysite splash page, there needs to be a balance between the quality of the images on the page and the size (in kb) of the files. I usually aim for around 100kb for each page of a paysite.
My question is what you think is an acceptable total file size per page and what is too much to be considered worth waiting for for the average user? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,225
|
under 70k a page. dialup takes 2 long to get 100k..
If you aint got em in 10-15 secs they will fuck off. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 128
|
60 - 70k is good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Home
Posts: 1,493
|
60k-70k no more.. you will lose your 56k users.
__________________
Dead |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: You know that voice inside your head? That's me...
Posts: 626
|
Quote:
What the Hell was my point again? ![]()
__________________
<embed src=http://www.moonshadow-productions.com/images/moon.swf width="120" height=60> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 447
|
We go for 80-90k without complaints.
-max |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Not making A Comeback
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,218
|
the average mike w design is around 120k. some more.. some less.. Given his pre-eminence in the industry he must be doing something right. Much more than that is getting too much unless you're using girl's profiles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 253
|
i aim for a 10sec load time on a 56k
__________________
<a href="http://www.liondollars.com/"></a><br> Corvo..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,592
|
Well, in my opinion, it doesn't really matter. Any page size (within reason up to 150k) is fine, as long as you do SOMETHING to grab the surfer's attention while the rest of the page loads.
Whether it's a quick flash animation that says, "FUCK YOU SURFER!!! YOUR MOM'S A FUCKING HOOKER!!! WAIT FOR THIS PAGE TO LOAD YOU COCK SMOKER!!!"... or whatever, but, make it fly around the page while the rest of the page loads, and the surfer really won't care how big the page is. But, that's just my opinion. If the page is nice, and the site is good, they really won't care. Now, you wouldn't be able to do this on www.this-is-a-porn-site-please-sign-up.com, this would only work on sites that are distinct, and have an appealing title. Also, keep in mind, that if your site is good enough... and you get the surfer to wait for the page to load the first time, the next time they come back, it may be cached, and will just POP onto their screen. So, as long as you GRAB them the first time they go to your site, you have a better chance that they will come back again and again. -Voodoo ![]()
__________________
![]() "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
now go fuck yourself ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: You know that voice inside your head? That's me...
Posts: 626
|
VooDoo: Killer design work on that "Whip" site! Oh yeah:
![]()
__________________
<embed src=http://www.moonshadow-productions.com/images/moon.swf width="120" height=60> |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
What Voodoo said, make sure your html is correct so that the page & text is rendered first, therefore the surfer has something to read/keep his attention while images load around it.
If you wanted to be daring, i'd create every functional bit of the page in normal text/html that way if the user dosen't want to wait for the fancier stuff (images) they can just proceed, no worries. Which is why I always make text on a button actual text, instead of being written on the button image. That way they know what the button represents without waiting for the image. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,225
|
Thats what the alt tag is for
<img src="myimage.gif" alt="Text Here Shows while loading and as tooltip"> |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
aspiring banker
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: toronto
Posts: 10,870
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,592
|
Quote:
I make it a point to put text links below any graphical interface w/ multiple buttons. I'll put 1 text link for every button on the page. ALT img tags work also, and I use both. However, I use ALT image tags to further describe the site, and use as many keywords from my meta tags as I can to help w/ SE relevance. If you've got a kick ass splash, you don't normally have room for a bunch of text... So, I compensate w/ Alt tags, and try to cram as much in those as I can. -Voodoo
__________________
![]() "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 702
|
thanks for the great response everyone.
|
|
|
|