Why would you link from blog posts to FHGs instead tours? - GoFuckYourself.com

seeric · 10-09-2007, 10:33 AM

I am not a blog genius or anything, but I repeatedly keep finding people who link from blog posts to FHGs. Why wouldn't you just use the free content to make the blog post just like a FHG so you can go straight to the tour. To me linking to the FHG is just another click and extra step for the consumer.

Just makes more sense to me and i'd think your numbers would be better investing the time in creating good solid blog posts and sending to the tour or even join page for that matter.

*unless you don't want to host the materials and pay for that bandwidth. If that is the case, skip this post and hit the back button and scorn me for stupidity please.

Snake Doctor · 10-09-2007, 10:35 AM

I think it's because blog owners are trying to get bookmarkers, and if you have no content, but just thumbs that link to tours, you're not going to get any.

baddog · 10-09-2007, 10:39 AM

I do both actually.

The text will have links to the tours, with a sample link going to an FHG.

Pornwolf · 10-09-2007, 11:25 AM

Yeah, it's the difference between creating a site you want people to come back to and creating one made to send joins.

If it's a splog you would be an idiot to link to a gallery.

A lot of people do unfortunately.

Sands · 10-09-2007, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf

Yeah, it's the difference between creating a site you want people to come back to and creating one made to send joins.

If it's a splog you would be an idiot to link to a gallery.

A lot of people do unfortunately.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? I'm curious to know the reasoning behind this advice. Thanks in advance!

seeric · 10-09-2007, 01:57 PM

cool. what i was thinking in re: to the splog thingy.

Snake Doctor · 10-09-2007, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf

Yeah, it's the difference between creating a site you want people to come back to and creating one made to send joins.

If it's a splog you would be an idiot to link to a gallery.

A lot of people do unfortunately.

Well the thing with splogs is that they're all feeds pulled from somewhere else...so if the "somewhere else" links to the gallery, then that's what you get.

If you start customizing links on all the posts to go straight to the tour then you're defeating the purpose of having an automated site.

Violetta · 10-09-2007, 03:12 PM

I usually only have 1 pic per post linking to a gallery. Would be wrong linking it to a tour. If I should link to a tour, I would need more pics in the post. At least 5. And that would take to much space, and would make it look like a tgp

Pornopat · 10-09-2007, 03:43 PM

But you never wondered why tgp owners dont just use the material on their tgp instead of linking to a gallery?

(real answer: seo reasons and duplicate content)

V_RocKs · 10-10-2007, 12:03 AM

I have tried both and find that FHG's convert much better.

10-09-2007, 10:33 AM	#1
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	Why would you link from blog posts to FHGs instead tours? I am not a blog genius or anything, but I repeatedly keep finding people who link from blog posts to FHGs. Why wouldn't you just use the free content to make the blog post just like a FHG so you can go straight to the tour. To me linking to the FHG is just another click and extra step for the consumer. Just makes more sense to me and i'd think your numbers would be better investing the time in creating good solid blog posts and sending to the tour or even join page for that matter. *unless you don't want to host the materials and pay for that bandwidth. If that is the case, skip this post and hit the back button and scorn me for stupidity please.

10-09-2007, 10:35 AM	#2
Snake Doctor I'm Lenny2 Bitch Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: On top of my soapbox Posts: 13,449	I think it's because blog owners are trying to get bookmarkers, and if you have no content, but just thumbs that link to tours, you're not going to get any. __________________ sig too big

10-09-2007, 11:25 AM	#4
Pornwolf Drunk and Unruly Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Hollywood Posts: 22,712	Yeah, it's the difference between creating a site you want people to come back to and creating one made to send joins. If it's a splog you would be an idiot to link to a gallery. A lot of people do unfortunately. __________________ I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade... Webair, bitches.

10-09-2007, 03:12 PM	#8
Violetta Affiliate Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 28,735	I usually only have 1 pic per post linking to a gallery. Would be wrong linking it to a tour. If I should link to a tour, I would need more pics in the post. At least 5. And that would take to much space, and would make it look like a tgp __________________ M&A Queen

10-09-2007, 03:43 PM	#9
Pornopat AdultTubeSubmits.com Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 10,598	But you never wondered why tgp owners dont just use the material on their tgp instead of linking to a gallery? (real answer: seo reasons and duplicate content) __________________ https://stripcash.com/sign-up/?userI...fff832eb95ab6a

10-09-2007, 10:39 AM	#3
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I do both actually. The text will have links to the tours, with a sample link going to an FHG.

10-09-2007, 01:57 PM	#6
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	cool. what i was thinking in re: to the splog thingy.

10-10-2007, 12:03 AM	#10
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,428	I have tried both and find that FHG's convert much better.