Glans removal - GoFuckYourself.com

The Duck · 08-27-2007, 04:59 PM

Quote:

For many people who do glans removals and partial penectomies, they find that the ?stump? is extremely hard during erections, and that little sensitivity is lost. I realize most guys are obsessed with having ever larger genitals, but not everyone feels that way of course, and sex lives of reduced genitals are still plenty of fun.

http://modblog.bmezine.com/2007/08/26/glans-removal/

Yeah, okay..

Spunky · 08-27-2007, 05:18 PM

I think I'll hold on to mine

CyberHustler · 08-27-2007, 05:28 PM

That doesn't look too fun... Where's the pee hole?

2012 · 08-27-2007, 06:47 PM

help, I've fallen and I cant find my hole

zand_stein · 08-27-2007, 06:54 PM

I have a small (5mm) light brown, flat mole on the head of my penis which developed from a small freckle about seven years ago. (I'm 33.) It took about two years to reach the size it is now and it has not grown noticeably for the past five years. It is an even color with a semi-regular border. It does not have any scaling or other irritation. I have speculated that it is the result of a 2nd degree burn I received on my penis when a clumsy waiter spilled a pot of hot water on my crotch a couple years before the mole appeared. I have many moles other places on my body.

I visited a dermatologist last year who told me not to worry about it. But when I visited a urologist recently for an unrelated issue, he suggested that the mole needed to be biopsied and offered to do a punch biopsy in his office to determine whether or not is was cancerous or precancerous.

Given the extremely sensitive and cosmetically critical area affected by this mole, I am concerned about having any unecessary and disfiguring work done on the area. But I am also concerned that it may turn out to be a problem later on. I would like to evaulate it with a minimum of damage to the area.

I have three questions:

1) What is the least damaging way for me to assess the potential malignancy of this mole?

2) If it needs to be removed, are there any more careful procedures other than simple excision by scapel which would leave the area less disfigured? I remember hearing once about a process which removes one layer of cells at a time and each layer is evaluated before another layer is removed to ensure the least amount of tissue is removed. Would this work on the glans of my penis?

3) How do I locate a doctor who is proficient at this sort of procedure? Would he or she be a urologist or a dermatologist?

2012 · 08-27-2007, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zand_stein

I have a small (5mm) light brown, flat mole on the head of my penis which developed from a small freckle about seven years ago. (I'm 33.) It took about two years to reach the size it is now and it has not grown noticeably for the past five years. It is an even color with a semi-regular border. It does not have any scaling or other irritation. I have speculated that it is the result of a 2nd degree burn I received on my penis when a clumsy waiter spilled a pot of hot water on my crotch a couple years before the mole appeared. I have many moles other places on my body.

I visited a dermatologist last year who told me not to worry about it. But when I visited a urologist recently for an unrelated issue, he suggested that the mole needed to be biopsied and offered to do a punch biopsy in his office to determine whether or not is was cancerous or precancerous.

Given the extremely sensitive and cosmetically critical area affected by this mole, I am concerned about having any unecessary and disfiguring work done on the area. But I am also concerned that it may turn out to be a problem later on. I would like to evaulate it with a minimum of damage to the area.

I have three questions:

1) What is the least damaging way for me to assess the potential malignancy of this mole?

2) If it needs to be removed, are there any more careful procedures other than simple excision by scapel which would leave the area less disfigured? I remember hearing once about a process which removes one layer of cells at a time and each layer is evaluated before another layer is removed to ensure the least amount of tissue is removed. Would this work on the glans of my penis?

3) How do I locate a doctor who is proficient at this sort of procedure? Would he or she be a urologist or a dermatologist?

interesting pictures .....
not thinking like it really .......
wishing you the best ............

tony286 · 08-27-2007, 07:02 PM

Im going to lose my dinner. lol

08-27-2007, 05:18 PM	#2
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,970	I think I'll hold on to mine __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

08-27-2007, 05:28 PM	#3
CyberHustler Masterbaiter Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 27,934	That doesn't look too fun... Where's the pee hole? __________________ “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

08-27-2007, 06:47 PM	#4
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	help, I've fallen and I cant find my hole __________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

08-27-2007, 06:54 PM	#5
zand_stein Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,438	I have a small (5mm) light brown, flat mole on the head of my penis which developed from a small freckle about seven years ago. (I'm 33.) It took about two years to reach the size it is now and it has not grown noticeably for the past five years. It is an even color with a semi-regular border. It does not have any scaling or other irritation. I have speculated that it is the result of a 2nd degree burn I received on my penis when a clumsy waiter spilled a pot of hot water on my crotch a couple years before the mole appeared. I have many moles other places on my body. I visited a dermatologist last year who told me not to worry about it. But when I visited a urologist recently for an unrelated issue, he suggested that the mole needed to be biopsied and offered to do a punch biopsy in his office to determine whether or not is was cancerous or precancerous. Given the extremely sensitive and cosmetically critical area affected by this mole, I am concerned about having any unecessary and disfiguring work done on the area. But I am also concerned that it may turn out to be a problem later on. I would like to evaulate it with a minimum of damage to the area. I have three questions: 1) What is the least damaging way for me to assess the potential malignancy of this mole? 2) If it needs to be removed, are there any more careful procedures other than simple excision by scapel which would leave the area less disfigured? I remember hearing once about a process which removes one layer of cells at a time and each layer is evaluated before another layer is removed to ensure the least amount of tissue is removed. Would this work on the glans of my penis? 3) How do I locate a doctor who is proficient at this sort of procedure? Would he or she be a urologist or a dermatologist? __________________ Paying Affiliates DAILY by ePassporte!

08-27-2007, 07:02 PM	#7
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	Im going to lose my dinner. lol