Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 10-19-2007, 12:56 PM   #1
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
2257 changes the end of user uploaded adult material? link.

http://mashable.com/2007/10/19/new-l...r-social-porn/

2257 is the best thing that could happen to people who shoot and distribute their materials.

i personally dont think users should be able to submit content to communities without showing that they are 18 and older. what are the odds that there are underage people uploading to youporn and adult community sites?

me thinky the odds are good.

seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:10 PM   #2
sortie
Confirmed User
 
sortie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,771
If the internet was only in america then you might actually have something.
__________________
sortie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:12 PM   #3
halfpint
GFY's Halfpint
 
halfpint's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 15,223
nude.com do this allready.....
__________________

Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net
halfpint is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:17 PM   #4
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
I forsee that youporn is going overseas.
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:36 PM   #5
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
so moving overseas would then make it ok for a 15 year old girl to upload her blowing her boyfriend?

the problem when people move their businesses overseas is most want to still live in the u.s. this is where they end up getting into trouble.

i would expect to see government task forces closely watching these kinds of moves after the law is defined in concrete here soon.

my 2 cents though.
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:37 PM   #6
LadyMischief
Orgasms N Such!
 
LadyMischief's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Posts: 18,135
It forces people to be responsible and make sure people are of age.. That is not a bad thing. ;)
__________________

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
LadyMischief is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:39 PM   #7
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by halfpint View Post
nude.com do this allready.....
nude.com is a nightsurf site full of ads and refs.
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:40 PM   #8
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyMischief View Post
It forces people to be responsible and make sure people are of age.. That is not a bad thing. ;)
i agree 100%
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:42 PM   #9
halfpint
GFY's Halfpint
 
halfpint's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 15,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by halfpint View Post
nude.com do this allready.....
opps I ment to say rude.com, they are a social networking site and they require people to prove that they are 18years of age with their ID

It is a good idea
__________________

Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net
halfpint is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:43 PM   #10
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by halfpint View Post
opps I ment to say rude.com, they are a social networking site and they require people to prove that they are 18years of age with their ID
gotcha. i was confused for a second.
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 01:47 PM   #11
halfpint
GFY's Halfpint
 
halfpint's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 15,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
gotcha. i was confused for a second.
sorry...I confuse myself most of the time
__________________

Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net
halfpint is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 02:02 PM   #12
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
so moving overseas would then make it ok for a 15 year old girl to upload her blowing her boyfriend?

the problem when people move their businesses overseas is most want to still live in the u.s. this is where they end up getting into trouble.

i would expect to see government task forces closely watching these kinds of moves after the law is defined in concrete here soon.

my 2 cents though.
WTF, I never said anything like that. What the fuck is wrong with you. All I said that the site and company would most likely go over seas. I never said it was ok to put up videos with minors in it. Just stating obvious next move a company who doesnt want to comply to US standards and patent law. Move some place they can be safe. I made a simple of observation. Stop reading so far into a post.
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 02:25 PM   #13
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZRhino View Post
WTF, I never said anything like that. What the fuck is wrong with you. All I said that the site and company would most likely go over seas. I never said it was ok to put up videos with minors in it. Just stating obvious next move a company who doesnt want to comply to US standards and patent law. Move some place they can be safe. I made a simple of observation. Stop reading so far into a post.
not pointed at you. if the whole point of the law is to make people provide ids, then the point of moving it off shore would be for the site to do whatever the fuck they want and disregard the law. don't read so much into a post. and for god sake don't take it personal. my comment was to the effect that if moving it overseas would shelter them from 2257 then why would they move it overseas and obey 2257? i am positive that that site has underage people in videos. guaranteed. don't be defensive, i didn't say you said that. god text based perception goes out the window on gfy because the board is built on attacks and defense.
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 02:34 PM   #14
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
not pointed at you. if the whole point of the law is to make people provide ids, then the point of moving it off shore would be for the site to do whatever the fuck they want and disregard the law. don't read so much into a post. and for god sake don't take it personal. my comment was to the effect that if moving it overseas would shelter them from 2257 then why would they move it overseas and obey 2257? i am positive that that site has underage people in videos. guaranteed. don't be defensive, i didn't say you said that. god text based perception goes out the window on gfy because the board is built on attacks and defense.
Sorry your right, I flew off the handle, it felt that you were point a finger at me. I will never condone sites that knowingly put minors on their sites and profit from it. Sensitive subject for me lately.
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 03:08 PM   #15
Quentin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
I recently asked an attorney with extensive knowledge on the subject about the prospect of user-post sites fitting into the so-called "ISP exception" to 2257. Due to the complexity of the question, and the fact that it is so fact-specific, he declined to go on the record with his response... but here is what this attorney-who-shall-remain-nameless had to say, off the record:

You latch on to the issue I spend countless hours advising clients about. I can?t get deep into the answers to that question, because it is really an issue for competent legal advice, and not statements in an article.

Suffice to say that these social networking sites, along with all other kinds of user submission sites (swinger, dating, adult dating, forums, girlfriend, voyeur, etc) all want to fit into the exemptions carved out for hosts, ISP?s, search engines, and the like. This comes up in reference to 2257, Section 230 immunity, and DMCA safe harbor. Each evaluation is a little different, but the fact remains that these exemptions were written for certain types of Internet businesses.

While some user submission sites may fall into the exemptions for certain purposes, this is a highly factually-intensive analysis, and the law has not developed sufficiently to give a definite answer. Much depends on the specific content submission procedure followed by each website.

Fortunately, the cases interpreting Section 230 and DMCA have been fairly liberal in applying the protections to a variety of sites beyond the traditional ISP. Webmasters must be very careful when evaluating the 2257 exemptions, however, because we just have one case (the Connections Case dealing with the swingers site) interpreting that issue, and that decision came down before the Adam Walsh Act slightly modified the statutory exemptions. Even if a site can avoid the ?producer? definition, the ?distributor? definition may still apply.


In other words - these user-post content sites are taking a pretty big risk with respect to 2257. It's arguable that they qualify for the ISP 'loophole' - but if a court decides that they do not....
__________________
Q. Boyer
Quentin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 03:29 PM   #16
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by EZRhino View Post
Sorry your right, I flew off the handle, it felt that you were point a finger at me. I will never condone sites that knowingly put minors on their sites and profit from it. Sensitive subject for me lately.
nah, no worries man.

its coolio for sure.

im not always the clearest person when i write.
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 04:44 PM   #17
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
nah, no worries man.

its coolio for sure.

im not always the clearest person when i write.
Cool man, hit me up on ICQ, buy you a drink in LA for the November Webmaster Access.
139394424
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 07:46 PM   #18
OzMan
Confirmed User
 
OzMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Begas
Posts: 9,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1R3K View Post
nah, no worries man.

its coolio for sure.

im not always the clearest person when i write.
why do you hate my Mother??? you've never even met her?
__________________
OzMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 07:53 PM   #19
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
The sites that have stolen product arent in the us so unfortunately this really wouldnt effect them.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 09:19 PM   #20
rapmaster
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
I recently asked an attorney with extensive knowledge on the subject about the prospect of user-post sites fitting into the so-called "ISP exception" to 2257. Due to the complexity of the question, and the fact that it is so fact-specific, he declined to go on the record with his response... but here is what this attorney-who-shall-remain-nameless had to say, off the record:

You latch on to the issue I spend countless hours advising clients about. I can?t get deep into the answers to that question, because it is really an issue for competent legal advice, and not statements in an article.

Suffice to say that these social networking sites, along with all other kinds of user submission sites (swinger, dating, adult dating, forums, girlfriend, voyeur, etc) all want to fit into the exemptions carved out for hosts, ISP?s, search engines, and the like. This comes up in reference to 2257, Section 230 immunity, and DMCA safe harbor. Each evaluation is a little different, but the fact remains that these exemptions were written for certain types of Internet businesses.

While some user submission sites may fall into the exemptions for certain purposes, this is a highly factually-intensive analysis, and the law has not developed sufficiently to give a definite answer. Much depends on the specific content submission procedure followed by each website.

Fortunately, the cases interpreting Section 230 and DMCA have been fairly liberal in applying the protections to a variety of sites beyond the traditional ISP. Webmasters must be very careful when evaluating the 2257 exemptions, however, because we just have one case (the Connections Case dealing with the swingers site) interpreting that issue, and that decision came down before the Adam Walsh Act slightly modified the statutory exemptions. Even if a site can avoid the ?producer? definition, the ?distributor? definition may still apply.


In other words - these user-post content sites are taking a pretty big risk with respect to 2257. It's arguable that they qualify for the ISP 'loophole' - but if a court decides that they do not....
very nice, thanks for that
rapmaster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 11:47 PM   #21
FRAUD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 34
you are a complete fucking moron!
FRAUD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.