![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
|
Future of Magazine Style Site Designs
The future of magazine style site designs.
Most of you should be familiar with these type of sites of by now, examples: Met-Art, Hegre-Art, MC-Nudes, Watch4Beauty and so many more similar types..... Theses examples create photo set issues capturing the look of a magazine style issue. What about taking this approach to the next level. Such as designing a site to resemble the look and feel of a magazine. Take a look at this example. websitemagazine.com/scripts/sub/digital.aspx?issue=1 What are you opinions on this. Do you feel this type of approach could work in the adult industry as a pay-site, or do you see flaws that could present potential problems? Thank you all! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
I dunno if it's just me, but I feel more frustrated sitting at a "Page loading xx%" status notice rather than actually seeing the content rendering as it's downloaded.
I'm not sure the "turn the page" navigation method would work when a set could have 50 or 100 images. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
|
It's an interesting concept, I would skim through some magazines like that for sure, not sure if I would watch porn in that manner, but i guess its something so new to me that I'm simply not used to it ;).
As everything else, anything has a potential, I'm thinking this project has more potential in mainstream than anything else. I would try to to get some attention to it from Forbes, Wired, Times, etc. Good luck!
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Bland for life
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,468
|
eh wack if you ask me.
something like iJoomla that has a magazine like presentation is probably more of a way to go.
__________________
★★★
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
If there was more text like an interview then it may work, but FEMJOY and the like really only have a basic description of the set. Also, how do you interview a popular model 20-30 times?
I have a pet hate for flash based sites anyway, because they break the standard browser navigation interface ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,065
|
Yeah interesting, been tried plenty of times, but its going backwards using a magazine based layout when the internet has so much more to offer. Why revert back to a format which can only display 20 or so shots from a set when the internet has 'magazines' that allow you to browse thousands of images with a few clicks?
& yeah, like Rowan said, the browser has its own navigation - sites that try to reinvent the wheel often just end up making it harder to find what you need. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: http://www.nebraskacoeds.com
Posts: 365
|
Could be too heavy indeed
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
|
I would have to only make an assumption that the load time of the site would be a day and forever, especially on dial up.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 6,559
|
meh, it's cool and all and an interesting idea. but i don't think it's very "usable" or the future of anything.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,496
|
Quote:
For a paysite I am not crazy about it but I dont know why real magazines are not putting their old and current issues online using this type of display. They could charge $30 a month for access to all the old issues. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |