I will seek legal counsel, just a quick thought..

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Doublecheeks
    Registered User
    • Apr 2007
    • 22
    #1

    I will seek legal counsel, just a quick thought..

    So right now the 2257 link is enough. If this new proposal goes through it won't be, secondary producers (which is me I think) will be focused to keep all model ids which will effectively turn the industry upside down. If I have that right..

    I remember someone saying even cropping nude images to appear non-nude in the thumbnail is unacceptable. Ultimately, does that mean I can or can't have a non-nude site and link to a nude site and still be alright with the basic 2257 links?
    Tags: None
    • woj
      <&(©¿©)&>
      • Jul 2002
      • 47882
      #2
      This has been discussed 50x already, I would search the board or just get advice from a lawyer...
      Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
      Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
      Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

        Comment

        • MikeSmoke
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2002
          • 3241
          #3
          Originally posted by woj
          This has been discussed 50x already
          only 50?
          and just WHERE would woj happen to come up with the number 50???

          icq: 541-739-92

            Comment

            • Doublecheeks
              Registered User
              • Apr 2007
              • 22
              #4
              In the time in took to reply could have just said can or can't not like there aren't more stupid threads but thanks for nothing anyway

                Comment

                • c-lo
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2005
                  • 925
                  #5
                  As I understand it, you can't use a non-nude image that is cropped from an image that originally featured nudity without maintaining the proper docs. So if the images you use are not from a set that features nudity, but links to an entirely different set hosted by someone else, then I wouldn't think you'd need docs. I'm not 100&#37; certain, though.

                  Let us know the results of your legal counseling, although I'm pretty sure different lawyers are telling people different things because it's so vague.
                  The AlphaPhaze Network
                  Traffic & Hardlink Trades | Sponsors | Resources
                  The adult marketing network you can trust

                    Comment

                    • Doublecheeks
                      Registered User
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 22
                      #6
                      Originally posted by c-lo
                      As I understand it, you can't use a non-nude image that is cropped from an image that originally featured nudity without maintaining the proper docs. So if the images you use are not from a set that features nudity, but links to an entirely different set hosted by someone else, then I wouldn't think you'd need docs. I'm not 100% certain, though.

                      Let us know the results of your legal counseling, although I'm pretty sure different lawyers are telling people different things because it's so vague.
                      Thank you I'm trying to collect different opinions so I can debate them with my lawyer next weekend to further make sense of this.

                        Comment

                        • tsmona
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 10
                          #7
                          The rules aren't in effect yet as i understand it. Free speech coalition has alot of info on it. By just making these proposals the government has scared alot of people away from porn, which is their intent I guess
                          Mona

                          TSMona |Mona's T-Girls |Shemale Mona |Mona's Asian Shemales |Hawaii Shemale

                            Comment

                            • The Sultan Of Smut
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2004
                              • 4325
                              #8
                              Originally posted by woj
                              This has been discussed 50x already, I would search the board or just get advice from a lawyer...
                              Yup it has and I still don't get it. I mean c'mon is there no lawyer out there that will be able to make the argument that cropping an image to a non-nude form is actually creating a new image and should be treated as such?

                              It seems that the US government didn't quite write in everything they wanted in the law and are now trying to take a pound when they legally should only be taking a pinch.

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...