![]() |
"Health Care America was one of several industry-funded organizations to engage in media outreach around the Michael Moore movie "Sicko," released in June 2007. The New York Sun reported:[5]
Health Care America, whose Web site says it is funded in part by pharmaceutical manufacturers, staged a conference call that drew nearly 20 reporters from around the country, including correspondents from the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, organizers said. "The purpose of the call was to discuss what Michael Moore left out of his movie," the group's executive director, Sarah Berk, said. "We're launching an educational effort to educate the public and the media and lawmakers about the realities of single-payer health care systems around the world." The New York Times reported: "Health Care America, a group that is financed in part by pharmaceutical and hospital companies, placed an advertisement in a Capitol Hill newspaper stating: 'In America, you wait in line to see a movie. In government-run health care systems, you wait to see a doctor.'" [6] Health Care America's website lists as least five press releases from the group related to "Sicko":" etc and so on http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...h_Care_America Why are you 'conservatives' so proud of being such suckers? |
I mean, you have to have the mind of a 5 yr old to keep getting hustled the way you do, right? And you still never consider the source?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why is it you idiot conservatives always go for the shakiest, most unreliable sources and believe them to the bitter end over citizen watchdog organizations who have no other motivation than the public good? Are you stupid? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The only extended services that you can pay for are things like prescriptions, private rooms, etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you could pay extra for better treatment, it would take little time for a high-priced, alternative healthcare circuit to arise. With higher prices, it could afford to offer better pay to doctors, thus draining disproportionately many well-trained and talented doctors from the public system. Basically, the quality of public healthcare would decrease, even though the quality of private healthcare might rise to levels public healthcare could never achieve. In other words, the child of poor parents would get significantly worse healthcare than the child of rich parents would. |
Quote:
War wise, it was the Gulf, but I saw no action in the 1 week at camp, It was at an MP camp. I think in 95, as they were closing it up. To be in SRT you start off as an MP, and move up the ranks. I have been to cuba, all over South America, panama, I can't even remotely recall all the places. I really didn't do all that much, but I saw and did enough that it f'ed me up. Really, right up until I met Kristin, I was still really jacked up. Not that it's all clear now but I have control over it. I'm still very careful about adrenaline rushes as they can.. make me black out, and some news stories still get me. I hate to see Vets get denied for medical help, forced to pay when they can't work, and being pushed out the military early so they don't have to give up benefits (before 2 years, no help people).. We should all support, donate to vet orgs and if you get a chance stand up fight for one, they did it for you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can't say for Canada specifically, but the EU does not have any limitations on paying docs - you can pay whoever you like :) As far as conflict in healthcare services is concerned - that is not a big deal and anyone who elects to use private healthcare may get an extra bunch of flowers in the room, but it's the same docs, the same heart value, the same drugs etc and same standard of care provided under the universal healthcare system. However - There is a business in providing healthcare insurance cover to anyone this may appeal to and some corps have group policies for their employees etc and on which they get tax benefits. Depending - some of these policies can be fairly expensive - especially when the net benefit is the cost of a floral arrangement :winkwink: Bottom line - there is little conflict between the UHC and private treatment. |
Quote:
A government-ran or at least a government-sponsored healthcare system would force the private industry to compete directly with them, driving the costs of healthcare down while simultaneously increasing the quality of said healthcare. It's a win-win situation for EVERYONE, tax payers included. Healthcare in the US would finally become preventive and improving our population's health for decades to come. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We have huge wait times for many diagnostic and surgical procedures here in Canada because the government won't let private operations provide services to meet the excess demand. Many of our doctors go to the US so we suffer doctor shortages. Most of our hospitals are controlled by unions to the point where almost all new money put into the healthcare system goes to cover negotiated wage increases and hardly any goes toward new equipment, more nurses or more doctors. I know the American system has problems, but don't look to Canada as an example of how to make it better. We rank just as low on global healthcare as the US. There are better models in the world to follow and they all include parallel public/private systems. |
Quote:
|
So a website that pretends to be neutral but really is run by the Pharm companies is a trusted source? Why not post a website that tells us that burning oil is good for the world and is funded by Exxon?
|
Quote:
This is all with paid insurance, that keeps getting more expensive every year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BUT if you want a new set of tits .. you can have that next week ..but that is private practice.. |
Quote:
Kristin has more reasons to gripe about health care, more than anyone I know at least. We 'had' to pay for our kids birth, even though we had insurance. Her meds would cost around $500+ a month or she could die. If she doesn't work for larger companies she can make the entire companies insurance rates double, even triple depending on the company size. She can't get personal insurance, they deny her. The entire medical system, health care, ect.. is f'ed up and I don't think this country is going to unscrew it for at least 20 years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Army commercials should quit saying earn $50,000 for college and say,get $50,000 for health care after we bone you over for serving us. |
here is an idea NO INSURANCE! Then everyone could afford health care. The billions a year hospitals make off medicare and what not will be gone and they will be forced like very other business to charge what their average customer can afford
|
I think where we need to look for reform is at the insurance companies, who we all know, do everything possible to keep from paying a claim, just look at the discrepancy in pricing. Take me for example. I'm currently covered by a corporate policy that was obtained for me by a family member through her employer. The policy costs 210.00 per month and includes vision care and dental. When I called the same company asking for the same exact coverage my cost would have been 860.00 per month with no vision or dental care. Why is there such a huge discrepancy in pricing? And don't give me that "group policy" bullshit why can't Americans be a group?
Thats where our government probably needs to look if we want to solve the healthcare crisis. I know I for one can think of precious few things that the government does well, why would I want to entrust them with the most important thing to me, my health? I recently had major surgery and when I think about that and think that about our public school system, our postal service, the social security administration and the "war on drugs" it makes me cringe to think what kind of neurosurgeon I might have gotten. When I needed complicated neurosurgery I got the best of the best in Atlanta. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Set aside plenty of time to wait your turn to see the doctor. Oh, and one more thing, get ready for much higher taxes. :Oh crap |
Quote:
And it's not the immigrants people.. |
Quote:
2. These countries, eg. UK, Australia, New Zealand get better value for money than the US because they have a public system COMPETING with a private system, and their tax is no higher than the US. |
and on a related note, brought to you by these wonderful small government conservatives:
GOODBYE FIFTH AMENDMENT!!!! Nice to know ya! http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...70717-3.html?1 Private property? Not anymore! |
Quote:
When non-industrialized countries can provide full healthcare cover ranking that of the US for under $300/year/family including dentistry and maternity services - there may be something that does not add up?? :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Six weeks. Six weeks waiting on a CT scan. Six fucking weeks, a month in a half of waiting. Keep in mind this is AMERICA. She could have (but thankfully didn't) had any number of deadly things wrong with her yet she had to wait six weeks to find out. If the wait times here are any indication, switching over to a government-sponsored or government-ran healthcare system doesn't seem bad at all. As for the taxes... We currently pay twice as much as any other industrialized nation on healthcare and if life/death expectancies are any indicator for level of your countries health, most 1st world nations are doing a better job than we are at keeping their citizens alive. Furthermore, with insurance for all, medicine in this country would become preventative rather than just for treatment as it is currently in this country. |
Surely universal healthcare would be better than the clusterfuck you Americans call a health'care' system:
Quote:
|
Healthcare is expensive...unless you have a good job ...
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123