We Got Screwed: Scammer Alert "Mark Hartley

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gnus
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2005
    • 577

    #256
    Dam note to self do not do business GTS.

    Gary
    ICQ -73665782
    Domains for sale - milfwatch.com $2k, pornnut.com $500, assforu.com $2K, xxxratedonly.com $1K

    Comment

    • tmc_producer
      Registered User
      • Sep 2006
      • 43

      #257
      Originally posted by DrinkingHARDEST
      No we wanted to catch a scammer... He did not want to help us find someone that was ripping us off and using his company's image/brand to do so.

      DH
      This is not true AT ALL AS WELL
      if you want to keep writing LIES do it.
      I don't care. I even posted teh screen captures of the ICQ history.
      STEVE - ICQ: 282801761 - [email protected]

      TEENMEGACASH - 60% on EACH SALE AND REBILL

      Feautring now MYPRECIOUSVIRGINS
      More then 400 exclusive amateur girls online
      Daily updates - Amazing Retention
      A SITE THAT CONVERTS!

      Comment

      • webmasterchecks
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2006
        • 1685

        #258
        Originally posted by DrinkingHARDEST
        The difference is here Franck is that I am successful, you are a GFY troll.

        You're the guy who can't even afford his own Internext hotel room? How fucking ridiculous is that. You're also the guy in the past who outsourced his own postings on GFY. I guess sigwhoring pays that well huh?

        I would love to post that icq conversation we had about a year ago where you were looking for new businesses to get into and I gave you some great solid ideas of what you could have done. I guess you will call me out on that one too huh, but I'm sure we both remember that conversation.

        I don't know why you are such a mad and nasty person, i guess the years of grinding it out without having any major successes have turned you into what you are.

        A GFY troll.

        DH
        what are you attacking franck for? he is doing nothing more than pointing out what happened. he is not spinning or changing the facts in any way. what does what you posted about him have to do with this thread?
        Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

        Comment

        • xNetworx
          So Fucking What
          • Jan 2004
          • 14445

          #259
          Originally posted by CDSmith
          No, if the guy is guilty then I'm of the opinion that DH has very right to destroy them publicly.

          But it appears that he jumped the gun and took it to the boards very prematurely, which is just wrong, plain and simple.

          Take note you people out there who may be about to experience drama of your own.... pull a clue out of your ass and make sure you are 100% certain of the facts before running to the boards where you will make yourselves look unprofessional and, well, dumb.


          :D

          Yeah, if he has concrete proof it is OK to out them publically.

          Comment

          • CDSmith
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • May 2001
            • 51460

            #260
            So in looking at the screencaps of the ICQ's that were just posted, it appears DH that you put up the "LOOK OUT FOR THIS THIEVING PROGRAM" threads yesterday, July 20th,

            but only contacted the guy today, the 21st.


            Is that correct?


            If so it's not looking good for your case, or for your question about why the guy has been "confrontational"

            I'd be a lot more than confrontational with you if you came at me that way, trust me.
            Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

            ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

            Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
            ICQ me at: 31024634

            Comment

            • BoyAlley
              So Fucking Gay
              • Nov 2004
              • 19714

              #261
              Originally posted by webmasterchecks
              what are you attacking franck for? he is doing nothing more than pointing out what happened. he is not spinning or changing the facts in any way. what does what you posted about him have to do with this thread?
              It's called the Texas Two Step.

              You should see me doing it in one of those cowgirl skirts, it's thexy.....

              Comment

              • Dirty F
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jul 2001
                • 59204

                #262
                Originally posted by DrinkingHARDEST
                The difference is here Franck is that I am successful, you are a GFY troll.

                You're the guy who can't even afford his own Internext hotel room? How fucking ridiculous is that. You're also the guy in the past who outsourced his own postings on GFY. I guess sigwhoring pays that well huh?

                I would love to post that icq conversation we had about a year ago where you were looking for new businesses to get into and I gave you some great solid ideas of what you could have done. I guess you will call me out on that one too huh, but I'm sure we both remember that conversation.

                I don't know why you are such a mad and nasty person, i guess the years of grinding it out without having any major successes have turned you into what you are.

                A GFY troll.

                DH
                Blah blah skidmark, shall i quote the people here who said something like "i wont do business with that company"? I can tell you its more people than there are people who ever refused my business.

                And all this in 1 day compared to all my years online. Once again, congrats. Quite an achievement.

                Think about it for a minute.

                Comment

                • GTS Mark
                  Vrume Mark
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 20912

                  #263
                  Originally posted by CDSmith
                  But... the threads you posted about his company DID exist at that time, did they not?

                  Honest now... did you contact him FIRST or did you upload the threads accusing him first?


                  Upload times need to be verified.
                  We contacted him before anything was on GFY.

                  DH

                  Comment

                  • candyflip
                    Carpe Visio
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 43069

                    #264
                    Originally posted by DrinkingHARDEST
                    The obvious point is that you are very immature, and I don't take kindly to people saying such things about my wife.

                    DH
                    So sue me or beat me up so I can sue you.

                    Spend you some brain.
                    Email Me

                    Comment

                    • Theo
                      HAL 9000
                      • May 2001
                      • 34515

                      #265
                      CDSmith, don't waste your energy. It's close to impossible to find ppl in this industry admitting when they were wrong, let alone apologize.

                      Comment

                      • chupacabra
                        Confirmed User
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 3626

                        #266
                        Originally posted by webmasterchecks
                        what are you attacking franck for? he is doing nothing more than pointing out what happened. he is not spinning or changing the facts in any way. what does what you posted about him have to do with this thread?
                        i think its called "obfuscation"..
                        ...promise her a defamation, tell her where the rain will fall..

                        Comment

                        • GTS Mark
                          Vrume Mark
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 20912

                          #267
                          This is the last post I am going to make in this thread, because obv it has become a flame gts/mark thread at this point and is just becoming ridiculous.

                          As mentioned before if we're in the wrong we will re-tract our statement and apologize.

                          DH

                          Comment

                          • webmasterchecks
                            Confirmed User
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 1685

                            #268
                            Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
                            CDSmith, don't waste your energy. It's close to impossible to find ppl in this industry admitting when they were wrong, let alone apologize.
                            and thats a shame, because all it was taken would be a sincere apology and a promise to learn and move on that would fix 90% of it. in my opinion, positions like that cost more in other peoples respect than they gain in retaining ones pride
                            Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

                            Comment

                            • sonofsamm
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 101

                              #269
                              Originally posted by DrinkingHARDEST
                              As mentioned before if we're in the wrong we will re-tract our statement and apologize.

                              DH
                              That makes it right? What about all webmasters who glanced at GFY today... saw and read your post.. and then didn't stick around long enough to see that you were completely wrong. Maybe by the next time they come onto gfy the post won't be at the top anymore, and they will just always be thinking that their program is a fraud. ?

                              Comment

                              • DateDoc
                                Outside looking in.
                                • Feb 2005
                                • 14243

                                #270
                                Originally posted by SleazyDream
                                sara - contact cybercat - if the same guy's screwed them too blacklist that sponser if they don't comply with handing over the guys info and possibly commissions from those galleries.

                                between you and cybercat you can pretty much END a program from generating ANY tgp traffic of any sigificant volume.

                                so that NO affilate can use them. that will end most new programs
                                You are siding with your 'bro' so that is no big surprise but handing over private info is illegal without a subpoena. If this is such a pressing issue why have Visa or the police not been contacted. Do it the right way and you will get results.

                                PS - your brotocracy, if it continues to act like this, thinking it is above everyone else and can do as it pleases, will be a thing of the past.

                                Comment

                                Working...