faulted logic?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iroc409
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 4728

    #1

    faulted logic?

    not sure how i came up with this, but i was pondering a while back, and this popped into my head.

    people bitch about guys not washing their hands after they pee. now, taking a crap is a different story, however merely urinating, there is, under certain circumstances, no good reason. it's merely a time inefficiency and waste of extra water. plus, you don't have to stand next to those hand dryers for 6 hours waiting for your hands to dry.

    under the following circumstances, i don't see why there is such need:

    1. guy does not touch anything in a public facility that may be infested. in some cases, paper towels can be worse anyways, and many bathrooms these days are fully automatic.

    2. guy does not pee himself.

    how do i come to this? because if it's clean enough to stick in a girl's mouth, then there should be no need outside of the above circumstances for me to wash my hands.
    <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a>


    icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0
    Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!
  • gothweb
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2002
    • 8849

    #2
    Urinal: Spatter
    Toilet: Extra care

    Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
    Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
    MojoHost: Still the best.

    Comment

    Working...