GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Good work American army!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=745388)

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649218)
I don't know where you people get some of this stuff from but it is pretty funny to read.

Shit... there is nothing funny about "this stuff" - if the most you can utter is that it is funny - I give up.

There is another thread about the IQ in the US - I'll post there and confirm the correct IQ should be 10.

JaneB 06-24-2007 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x Shady x (Post 12649216)
If we leave now, 10 years from now, or even 50, it doesn't matter. They will just over throw their government and fuck up all over again. Thats all they know.

Well you know they don't plan on leaving anytime soon. I am sure you have heard them say they want to stay there until it is more stable. That may be never. They probably will over throw the new government. There is nothing we can do to change how long they stay there. Like the government has been listening to us.

JaneB 06-24-2007 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649232)
Shit... there is nothing funny about "this stuff" - if the most you can utter is that it is funny - I give up.

There is another thread about the IQ in the US - I'll post there and confirm the correct IQ should be 10.



Make sure you put your whole posting in there because it is full of a lot of shit. Some of it is true and some of it is bullshit.

Phil LoadedCash 06-24-2007 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649234)
Well you know they don't plan on leaving anytime soon. I am sure you have heard them say they want to stay there until it is more stable. That may be never. They probably will over throw the new government. There is nothing we can do to change how long they stay there. Like the government has been listening to us.

Unless a republican gets office in 08', we'll leave by 09. Sad that we have to stay another 2 years. Thats about another 1000 American lives.

pocketkangaroo 06-24-2007 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649228)
Thats exactly what I mean.

With all due respect, you can shove that argument up your ass. Maybe you were brought up to think that way, but there is now way in my mind that I can justify dropping a WMD bomb on civilians.

NO FUCKING WAY

I hope that is clear to you and everyone else reading this shit.

I understand the moral side of things. I understand some people will never believe that it was ok to do. But there is no denying that MORE people would have died had we not dropped it. Hundreds of thousands of people were dying each month from the war. If we didn't drop the bomb, and millions more civilians died, would you feel better?

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649237)
Make sure you put your whole posting in there because it is full of a lot of shit. Some of it is true and some of it is bullshit.

IQ and general knowledge test... let's start with the easy bits...

What is WHINSEC?

What is the purpose of WHINSEC and what is it mainly known for?

Who was Augusto Pinochet?

Porn Farmer 06-24-2007 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 12649204)
The bombs cost a lot of lives, but it was a decision that may have prevented many more in the long run.

You can spin it any way you like but there was no need to drop the nukes on civilians. There were countless other targets that didnt involve nuking children, women and the elderly.

stev0 06-24-2007 12:51 AM

Embarrassing is the only word to describe that video...

JaneB 06-24-2007 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x Shady x (Post 12649243)
Unless a republican gets office in 08', we'll leave by 09. Sad that we have to stay another 2 years. Thats about another 1000 American lives.


It is hard to tell who will get in office in 2008. There are some good candidates on both sides that have a strong chance at winning. For Rebublicans I do not like John McCain. He is a flip flopper. I live in AZ and he is always flip flopping on things. Fred Thompson seems to be a good choice. He seems like he would be a good leader and actually listen to the people.

I guess we can only vote and see what happens.

SPACE GLIDER 06-24-2007 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevsh (Post 12647008)
In my humble opinion, if there were more luters there'd be a lot less violence...
http://www.jackscottcreative.com/lute.gif

:thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

stev0 06-24-2007 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649031)
We did not kill all the Native Americans. They were given places to live.

I almost spit out my drink when I read that, lol... priceless

SPACE GLIDER 06-24-2007 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649258)
I do not like John McCain. He is a flip flopper.

That's being VERY nice.

pocketkangaroo 06-24-2007 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer (Post 12649254)
You can spin it any way you like but there was no need to drop the nukes on civilians. There were countless other targets that didnt involve nuking children, women and the elderly.

None of which would have ended the war.

Phil LoadedCash 06-24-2007 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649258)
It is hard to tell who will get in office in 2008. There are some good candidates on both sides that have a strong chance at winning. For Rebublicans I do not like John McCain. He is a flip flopper. I live in AZ and he is always flip flopping on things. Fred Thompson seems to be a good choice. He seems like he would be a good leader and actually listen to the people.

I have a good idea of who will get office.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649258)
I guess we can only vote and see what happens.

Hmm yeah, that's what we did the last 2 elections, and remember all the fucked up controversy shit that happened?

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 06-24-2007 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649218)
Oh good god I hope you really do not believe the shit you just posted. We know all to well of what our country is doing. It is only pointed out to us all the damn time. No one in the US is blind to what the government does. My rights are not being stripped away. They are the same as they have always been. I don't know where you people get some of this stuff from but it is pretty funny to read.

I'm sure your ignorance is total bliss...

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer (Post 12649254)
You can spin it any way you like but there was no need to drop the nukes on civilians. There were countless other targets that didnt involve nuking children, women and the elderly.

The level of any balance and sense here is lower than anything human - and a total waste of time even attempting to discuss in any sensible way.

The fetish and preoccupation will hit back to pathetic US domestic politics and a load of crap about Republicans and Democrats - as tho any of them have a clue about anything other than their own selfish asses.

Never have I seen a nation totally incapable of any intelligent discussion and a lack of ability to accept criticism of history. It's not only disgusting but totally offensive considering the 1000's of people who suffered.

PS - BTW - not referring to pocketkangaroo :-)

J. Falcon 06-24-2007 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 12649264)
I almost spit out my drink when I read that, lol... priceless

You should read some of the other shit she posted.

Porn Farmer 06-24-2007 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 12649267)
None of which would have ended the war.

So who do you think I am going to believe - you or General Dwight D. Eisenhower? :1orglaugh

Quote:

"In 1945 Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives."

JaneB 06-24-2007 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649251)
IQ and general knowledge test... let's start with the easy bits...

What is WHINSEC?

What is the purpose of WHINSEC and what is it mainly known for?

Who was Augusto Pinochet?



WHINSEC is the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. You want me to list what it's training is?

Augusto Pinochet was a dictator and President of Chile. He ruled from 1973 until 1990.

Any other questions?

stev0 06-24-2007 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Compdoctor (Post 12647853)
This dumbass saw them on the same tv you saw the guys run over the car. Dancing they were, burning flags, ... now they kill their own people, and they kill our people. Why because we called them out and kicked their ass.

One more thing, if you believe everything you see on YouTube, then i don't want to do business with you.

You lump them all into a group because they're Iraqi? I've certainly seen some US citizens do some pretty stupid things, yet I don't celebrate when shit happens to the population itself. Pretty shallow thinking there.

Their government was called out for having weapons of mass destruction (which they didn't have), this war is not justified. If some foreign power invaded my country, told me our government was wrong, and completely obliterated our form of society, we'd be stealing wood and burning flags too. :2 cents:

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x Shady x (Post 12649273)
I have a good idea of who will get office.



Hmm yeah, that's what we did the last 2 elections, and remember all the fucked up controversy shit that happened?


Really, who do you think will win? Yes, who could forget all the controversy. It is still talked about all the time.

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649285)
WHINSEC is the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. You want me to list what it's training is?

Augusto Pinochet was a dictator and President of Chile. He ruled from 1973 until 1990.

Any other questions?

Please do list what WHINSEC's known speciality training is - and not the version which WHINSEC now claims it to be :)

A brief summary of it's activities prior to being renamed from SOA to WHINSEC would also be useful as an education on GFY.

PS And I know you had to look up the dates on Pinnochet :-)

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 06-24-2007 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649285)
WHINSEC is the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation. You want me to list what it's training is?

Augusto Pinochet was a dictator and President of Chile. He ruled from 1973 until 1990.

Any other questions?

google is sweet huh? ya, i'm sure you remember pinochet's exact perio of rle righ toff the top of your head... :1orglaugh

Phil LoadedCash 06-24-2007 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649291)
Really, who do you think will win? Yes, who could forget all the controversy. It is still talked about all the time.

I rather not say who I think will win, as that will cause even more controversy. I just know that I won't vote, because it does no good. Our vote is the popular vote anyway, reminds me of high school.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 06-24-2007 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649293)
Please do list what WHINSEC's known speciality training is - and not the version which WHINSEC now claims it to be :)

A brief summary of it's activities prior to being renamed from SOA to WHINSEC would also be useful as an education on GFY.

PS And I know you had to look up the dates on Pinnochet :-)

ya, that was a pretty funny give away...

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismokeblunts (Post 12649301)
ya, that was a pretty funny give away...

:winkwink: We are now due for a cut and paste taken from a WHINSEC PR policy document which will disclaim all murder and torture related incidents.

J. Falcon 06-24-2007 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649293)

PS And I know you had to look up the dates on Pinnochet :-)


To think that even in South America some people still defend that fucking bastard.

pocketkangaroo 06-24-2007 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer (Post 12649283)
So who do you think I am going to believe - you or General Dwight D. Eisenhower? :1orglaugh

I am not the one that stated that it wouldn't have ended the war. Truman, his cabinet, and the military determined that. There is a lot of debate on both sides, and there probably never will be a good answer. But the facts were that hundreds of thousands of civilians were dying each month, and those bombs helped put an end to that.

It is one of the darkest days in human civilization. But there is strong contention by historians that it ultimately saved many lives.

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649305)
To think that even in South America some people still defend that fucking bastard.

Yea... he still had his supporters at the funeral, but suppose Hitler still has is.

J. Falcon 06-24-2007 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649309)
Yea... he still had his supporters at the funeral, but suppose Hitler still has is.

Not only at his funeral, but when he was detained in England several years ago there were people who protested, demanding that he be set free. Fucking world is all fucked up if you ask me.

pocketkangaroo 06-24-2007 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649305)
To think that even in South America some people still defend that fucking bastard.

The US is using some of his men in Iraq as we type.

Turboface 06-24-2007 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649310)
Fucking world is all fucked up if you ask me.

Yup.

:disgust

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649293)
Please do list what WHINSEC's known speciality training is - and not the version which WHINSEC now claims it to be :)

A brief summary of it's activities prior to being renamed from SOA to WHINSEC would also be useful as an education on GFY.

PS And I know you had to look up the dates on Pinnochet :-)


Ok. It trains mostly Latin American military personal, but does allow civilians and other people outside of Latin American to train there.

When it was SOA their speciality in training was techniques of torture from what I can tell. That is why they changed the name and what they do there now.

Yes I did have to look up the dates on Pinnochet. I did know that he was a dictator and president but I did not know the exact length of his leadership.

I think if people read about WHINSEC they would find it very interesting. I do not think a lot of people even know what it is.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 06-24-2007 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649309)
Yea... he still had his supporters at the funeral, but suppose Hitler still has is.

There's a large percentage of the world's population which are nothing more than followers. It is all they are capable of. All you need to do is put an idea out there, and someone will cling to it...

I'm sure there's still people who think Stalin had it altogether too...

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649310)
Not only at his funeral, but when he was detained in England several years ago there were people who protested, demanding that he be set free. Fucking world is all fucked up if you ask me.

Even worse was Thatcher actually sat and dined with the trash and even visited her friend Augusto while in custody in the UK.

What's is name... the asshole who was Sec of State (or something like that) in the US at the time still has an arrest warrant out for his involvement in the Chilean episode - and is careful what countries he visits. Talk about harboring terrorists and thugs. *lol*

PS Remember the name - Kissinger.

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 06-24-2007 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649314)
I think if people read about WHINSEC they would find it very interesting. I do not think a lot of people even know what it is.

Ya, it's pretty interesting allrighty... :1orglaugh

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZoneMaster (Post 12649303)
:winkwink: We are now due for a cut and paste taken from a WHINSEC PR policy document which will disclaim all murder and torture related incidents.



Nope that is not what I gave you. You should have given me more credit then that. I don't do the cut and paste fluff stuff. I also would not say they did not murder or torture people. I am sure that they did.

J. Falcon 06-24-2007 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismokeblunts (Post 12649319)
Ya, it's pretty interesting allrighty... :1orglaugh

Especially when you read it for the first time LMAO :1orglaugh

Porn Farmer 06-24-2007 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 12649306)
I am not the one that stated that it wouldn't have ended the war. Truman, his cabinet, and the military determined that.

So governments - like Dubyas - always make the correct decision?

Quote:

Many, including General MacArthur, have contended that Japan would have surrendered before the bombings if the U.S. had notified Japan that it would accept a surrender that allowed Emperor Hirohito to keep his position as titular leader of Japan, a condition the U.S. did in fact allow after Japan surrendered. U.S. leadership knew this, through intercepts of encoded Japanese messages, but refused to clarify Washington's willingness to accept this condition.
"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender." Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman

The United States Strategic Bombing Survey, after interviewing hundreds of Japanese civilian and military leaders after Japan surrendered, reported:

"Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 12649306)
It is one of the darkest days in human civilization. But there is strong contention by historians that it ultimately saved many lives.

There is no consesus on this issue like your statement implies.

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649321)
Especially when you read it for the first time LMAO :1orglaugh


Actually it is not the first time I have read about it. You should not make assumptions on what I do and don't read. I read a lot on many different issues. I am sure I read a lot more then you do. :thumbsup:2 cents:

J. Falcon 06-24-2007 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649327)
Actually it is not the first time I have read about it. You should not make assumptions on what I do and don't read. I read a lot on many different issues. I am sure I read a lot more then you do. :thumbsup:2 cents:

I'm just playing with you Jane. :thumbsup

ZoneMaster 06-24-2007 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649314)
Ok. It trains mostly Latin American military personal, but does allow civilians and other people outside of Latin American to train there.

When it was SOA their speciality in training was techniques of torture from what I can tell. That is why they changed the name and what they do there now.

Yes I did have to look up the dates on Pinnochet. I did know that he was a dictator and president but I did not know the exact length of his leadership.

I think if people read about WHINSEC they would find it very interesting. I do not think a lot of people even know what it is.

OK.. very good :)

I'll elaborate further - it specializes in training not only military officers, but leaders and potential leaders (who the US which to be in power in certain countries) - and this training encompasses "population management" and of course, oppression.

The US has never admitted this is the case and there is no evidence available to support it - but it is thought that Saddam Hussein was one of the individuals who had training by SOA/WHINSEC.

SOA/WHINSEC were directly responsible, along with CIA involvement in the killings and torture of at least 30,000 people while Pinnochet was in power. It would be correct to say that Pinnochet would not have been in power without the help of the US.

It is ironic that Pinnochet awarded WHINSEC a ceremonial sword for their assistance in training his officers in torture, murder techniques and "population control". I'm sure WHINSEC will display this kind gift for all to see.

Unfortunately, many of the thugs trained by WHINSEC are still alive and continuing their reigns of terror in numerous countries. There are still ongoing killings along the WHINSEC trained lines - ie women found dead with plastic bags over there heads etc.

WHINSEC/SOA sure is an interesting organization....

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by x Shady x (Post 12649298)
I rather not say who I think will win, as that will cause even more controversy. I just know that I won't vote, because it does no good. Our vote is the popular vote anyway, reminds me of high school.


You need to vote. The reason we have a lot of fools in office is low voter turnout. If people would get off their asses and actually vote it would make a difference. Damn they even will mail you a ballot to vote. There is no reason for people not to vote, they make it so easy to do.

JaneB 06-24-2007 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 12649332)
I'm just playing with you Jane. :thumbsup

Honestly my husband is really into reading stuff about things like WHINSEC. He will even read the whole rulings of the Supreme Court even if it is 120 pages or so. So I end up having to read it all too even if I do not want to. He actually would be great to join this conversation. I will have to mention it to him. He is always up for discussions like these.

Phil LoadedCash 06-24-2007 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 12649335)
You need to vote. The reason we have a lot of fools in office is low voter turnout. If people would get off their asses and actually vote it would make a difference. Damn they even will mail you a ballot to vote. There is no reason for people not to vote, they make it so easy to do.

No.. our votes don't count.. if no one voted, theres still going to be those select few people from your state that vote matters. Our vote is just the popular vote, it does not matter. If everyone voted for Kerry in 04', Bush still could of still won. The reason we have a lot of fools in office is because money pays. If every citizen vote, it still would not matter. If I voted for Gore in '00, then my vote didn't matter did it? It never will. The only voting I like is the kind on GFY.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Night all.

pocketkangaroo 06-24-2007 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porn Farmer (Post 12649324)
So governments - like Dubyas - always make the correct decision?

"The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan." Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

"The use of [the atomic bombs] at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender." Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to President Truman

The United States Strategic Bombing Survey, after interviewing hundreds of Japanese civilian and military leaders after Japan surrendered, reported:

"Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."

There is no consesus on this issue like your statement implies.

I've read books on both sides of the fence. There was no definitive answer to whether Japan would surrender. They had assasinated higher-ups who wanted surrender. They also needed a unanimous vote to surrender and begin peace talks. The military was vehemently opposed to any form of surrender.

No one knows for sure if they would have surrendered earlier, and the fact that hundreds of thousands of lives were being lost every month put a necessity to end the war quickly. As some of the quotes above state, a surrender may not have happened till November or December, at which time a million civilians would have been killed.

I'm not sure what you're trying to insinuate. That the US just dropped the bombs for fun? If the goal was to kill a lot of people, they would have dropped it on Tokyo. They chose two of the most important military cities around. Like I said, if you believe the dropping of the atomic bombs was not worth saving a million civilians (and countless military), so be it.

SPACE GLIDER 06-25-2007 01:38 AM

The atomic Bomb killed several birds with one (well TWO) massively destructive stones.

It prompted the Japanese who weren't aware that things were over to COMPLETELY close up shop. And it showed the rest of the world what we had. Who was going to pass up that double-barrel opportunity?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123