Why's nobody selling non-IE traffic ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fluffygrrl
    So Fucking Banned
    • May 2006
    • 2187

    #1

    Why's nobody selling non-IE traffic ?

    I mean think about it, anyone still using Internet Exploder probably has no firewall/antivirus, 500 different trojans rewriting each other's code over your affiliate url, who needs them ?

    How come brokers don't offer a special premium package, no IE traffic ? You're prolly going to convert 2x on that.
  • SmokeyTheBear
    ►SouthOfHeaven
    • Jun 2004
    • 28609

    #2
    firefox is just as exploitable , its just not used by as many people.

    but i thnk the main reason is lots traffic brokers deal in popups and such that firefox users wont get , thus the % of ff users is prob much lower on brokers.

    That will change once people start using my firefox popup codes
    hatisblack at yahoo.com

    Comment

    • BucksMania
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2005
      • 3758

      #3
      because IE rox!

      Comment

      • ravo
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2001
        • 5461

        #4
        We can offer that, just that no one has asked yet.

        If you're serious, see www.buyfpctraffic.com and then hit me up at [email protected] or icq:143720824; we'll set you up.
        AdultAdBroker - Buy and Sell Your Flat Rate Banners, Links, Tabs, Pops, Email Clicks and Members' Area Traffic - updated May 2026

        Comment

        • Hotrocket
          Confirmed User
          • May 2004
          • 1327

          #5
          maybe because 75%+ of the surfers out there still use IE

          Comment

          • fluffygrrl
            So Fucking Banned
            • May 2006
            • 2187

            #6
            more like 50%, and ravo, you do paypal ?

            Comment

            • SmokeyTheBear
              ►SouthOfHeaven
              • Jun 2004
              • 28609

              #7
              Originally posted by fluffygrrl
              more like 50%, and ravo, you do paypal ?
              more like 33% and even thats a tad high


              2007 IE7 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz S O
              May 19.2% 38.1% 1.5% 33.7% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6%
              April 19.1% 38.4% 1.7% 32.9% 1.3% 1.7% 1.6%
              March 18.0% 38.7% 2.0% 31.8% 1.3% 1.7% 1.6%
              February 16.4% 39.8% 2.5% 31.2% 1.4% 1.7% 1.5%
              January 13.3% 42.3% 3.0% 31.0% 1.5% 1.7% 1.5%

              2006 IE7 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz N7/8 O
              December 10.7% 45.3% 3.4% 30.3% 2.6% 0.2% 1.5%
              November 7.1% 49.9% 3.6% 29.9% 2.5% 0.2% 1.5%
              October 3.1% 54.5% 3.8% 28.8% 2.4% 0.3% 1.4%
              September 2.5% 55.6% 4.0% 27.3% 2.3% 0.4% 1.6%
              August 2.0% 56.2% 4.1% 27.1% 2.3% 0.3% 1.6%
              July 1.9% 56.3% 4.2% 25.5% 2.3% 0.4% 1.4%
              June 1.6% 58.2% 4.3% 24.9% 2.2% 0.3% 1.4%
              May 1.1% 57.4% 4.5% 25.7% 2.3% 0.3% 1.5%
              April 0.7% 58.0% 5.0% 25.2% 2.5% 0.4% 1.5%
              March 0.6% 58.8% 5.3% 24.5% 2.4% 0.5% 1.5%
              February 0.5% 59.5% 5.7% 25.1% 2.9% 0.4% 1.5%
              January 0.2% 60.3% 5.5% 25.0% 3.1% 0.5% 1.6%

              2005 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz N7 O8 O7
              November 62.7% 6.2% 23.6% 2.8% 0.4% 1.3% 0.2%
              September 69.8% 5.7% 18.0% 2.5% 0.4% 1.0% 0.2%
              July 67.9% 5.9% 19.8% 2.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.4%
              May 64.8% 6.8% 21.0% 3.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6%
              March 63.6% 8.9% 18.9% 3.3% 1.0% 0.3% 1.6%
              January 64.8% 9.7% 16.6% 3.4% 1.1% 1.9%

              2004 IE6 IE5 Moz N3 N7 N4 O7
              November 66.0% 10.2% 16.5% 0.2% 1.2% 0.3% 1.6%
              September 67.8% 11.2% 13.7% 0.3% 1.4% 0.3% 1.7%
              July 67.2% 13.2% 12.6% 0.4% 1.4% 0.4% 1.6%
              May 68.1% 13.8% 9.5% 0.6% 1.4% 0.4% 1.6%
              March 68.2% 14.6% 7.9% 0.8% 1.4% 0.6% 1.4%
              January 68.9% 15.8% 5.5% 0.4% 1.5% 0.5% 1.5%

              2003 IE6 IE5 Moz N3 N7 N4 O7
              November 71.2% 13.7% 7.2% 0.5% 1.6% 0.5% 1.9%
              September 69.7% 16.9% 6.2% 0.6% 1.5% 0.6% 1.8%
              July 66.9% 20.3% 5.7% 0.6% 1.5% 0.6% 1.7%
              May 65.0% 22.7% 4.6% 1.0% 1.4% 0.9% 1.4%
              March 63.4% 24.6% 4.2% 0.9% 1.4% 1.1% 1.2%
              January 55.3% 29.3% 4.0% 1.2% 1.1% 1.7%

              2002 IE6 IE5 AOL N3 N5 N4 IE4
              November 53.5% 29.9% 5.2% 1.1% 4.9% 2.0%
              September 49.1% 34.4% 4.5% 1.3% 4.5% 2.2%
              July 44.4% 40.1% 3.5% 1.2% 3.5% 2.6% 0.5%
              May 40.7% 46.0% 2.8% 1.2% 2.7% 3.4% 0.7%
              March 36.7% 49.4% 3.0% 1.2% 2.4% 4.1% 0.7%
              January 30.1% 55.7% 2.8% 1.3% 2.2% 4.4% 1.0%


              IE Internet Explorer
              Fx Firefox (identified as Mozilla before 2005)
              Moz The Mozilla Suite (Safari, Konqueror, Gecko, Netscape)
              S Safari (identified as Mozilla before 2007)
              O Opera
              N Netscape (identified as Mozilla after 2006)
              AOL America Online (based on both Internet Explorer and Mozilla)
              hatisblack at yahoo.com

              Comment

              • fluffygrrl
                So Fucking Banned
                • May 2006
                • 2187

                #8
                2007 IE7 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz S O
                May 19.2% 38.1% 1.5% 33.7% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6%

                ie = ~60% in your numbers, non-ie would then be 40%.

                my numbers show ie total around 35%, making non-ie about 65%. i suppose the difference comes from the respective quality of traffic we get (ie, how many actually intentional visits as opposed to skimmed/redirected/console/popup etc.)

                I'd say that difference between your 60% and my 35%, ie, 25% of your traffic, is just junk traffic that you convert 1:10000 or less and not really worth the bandwidth.
                Last edited by fluffygrrl; 06-13-2007, 08:56 PM.

                Comment

                • SmokeyTheBear
                  ►SouthOfHeaven
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 28609

                  #9
                  Originally posted by fluffygrrl
                  2007 IE7 IE6 IE5 Fx Moz S O
                  May 19.2% 38.1% 1.5% 33.7% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6%

                  ie = ~60% in your numbers, non-ie would then be 40%.

                  my numbers show ie total around 35%, making non-ie about 65%. i suppose the difference comes from the respective quality of traffic we get (ie, how many actually intentional visits as opposed to skimmed/redirected/console/popup etc.)

                  I'd say that difference between your 60% and my 35%, ie, 25% of your traffic, is just junk traffic that you convert 1:10000 or less and not really worth the bandwidth.
                  my bad .. i thought you said firefox was at 50%
                  hatisblack at yahoo.com

                  Comment

                  • Hotrocket
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2004
                    • 1327

                    #10
                    my numbers are:
                    Jan 2007
                    IE7 = 55.3%
                    IE6 = 30.2%
                    Moz = 13.5%

                    March 2007
                    IE7 = 57.6%
                    IE6 = 28.3%
                    Moz = 13.1

                    June 2007 -to date
                    IE7 = 44.4%
                    IE6 = 43.5%
                    Moz =10.8%

                    And as far as I can tell my stats are fairly reflective of current browser use as a whole.

                    I am curious how you correlate quality of traffic to browser?
                    I will agree that if you are looking for techie type traffic, firefox and other alternative browsers may be the users you want..but otherwise I fail to see any relation.

                    Comment

                    • ilbb
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2005
                      • 3025

                      #11
                      IE users = newbies - they are ready to pay for porn
                      non IE users = advanced users - they know torrents, P2P - hard to convert them

                      Comment

                      • KimJI
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2007
                        • 1839

                        #12
                        Originally posted by fluffygrrl
                        I mean think about it, anyone still using Internet Exploder probably has no firewall/antivirus, 500 different trojans rewriting each other's code over your affiliate url, who needs them ?

                        How come brokers don't offer a special premium package, no IE traffic ? You're prolly going to convert 2x on that.
                        Idiot.... But hey, you seem like the typical "IE is shit" flamer, but you just showed how little you actually know about the topic.

                        NONE of our computers have EVER been infected - ever. No rootkits, no trojans, no spyware, no BHO's.. nothing.. ever. And we only use IE.

                        If you want to use Firefox, go ahead - but get your facts straight
                        Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                        Comment

                        • fluffygrrl
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • May 2006
                          • 2187

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ilbb
                          IE users = newbies - they are ready to pay for porn
                          non IE users = advanced users - they know torrents, P2P - hard to convert them
                          conversely, ie users = can't be bothered to put on firewall/antivirus, download codecs, get trojans, install zango toolbar.

                          firefox users = kids trying to look techie, general nerds = beat it alot. if the existance of torrents meant people don't pay for porn, then being married meant people don't fuck around. and if history has taught anything...

                          if you have a good site it'll convert. if you don't, it won't.

                          edit : how do you add somebody to your ignore list ? there's just a buddylist if you click their name.
                          Last edited by fluffygrrl; 06-13-2007, 10:06 PM.

                          Comment

                          • Andiz
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 2594

                            #14
                            Originally posted by KimJI
                            Idiot.... But hey, you seem like the typical "IE is shit" flamer, but you just showed how little you actually know about the topic.

                            NONE of our computers have EVER been infected - ever. No rootkits, no trojans, no spyware, no BHO's.. nothing.. ever. And we only use IE.

                            If you want to use Firefox, go ahead - but get your facts straight
                            But I guess that you guys know a bit more about computers than the average joe .....

                            Comment

                            • KimJI
                              Confirmed User
                              • May 2007
                              • 1839

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Andiz
                              But I guess that you guys know a bit more about computers than the average joe .....

                              Most people that use firefox are average useres like everyone else, and the only reason they are using Firefox, is because of posts like this that say firefox is better, safer ect. ect. But it aint.

                              The only way a computer is safe, if if the user know about safety, how to surf safely, and know what programs to uinstall. It dont matter if its Firefox or if its IE
                              Trafficadept | Best traffic I have ever tested | web "@t" cuul.org

                              Comment

                              Working...