She would be locked up for a long ass time. Probation violations are no joke!
If Pasis Hilton was anyone else...
Collapse
X
-
If Pasis Hilton was anyone else...
Tags: None -
If Pasis Hilton were anyone else she'd probably be Paris Hilton
lol jk yeah she'd be outta here like 3 strikes at a baseball game. -
-
-
Just from reading around a bit, not taking sides on this fucking retarded issue... but aren't most nonviolent offenders being released after serving 10% of sentences because of overcrowding in CA?
So if she was anybody else... she probably would have gotten out anyways... just quietly?
“I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” -Oscar Wilde
Comment
-
I agree. This really shits on the system. All the people that are sitting in jail for lesser offenses... or the same offense should be released as well.
I can't believe this happened.I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...
Webair, bitches.Comment
-
do you like falafel mr. jay?Achmed Oil - Achmed Holdings - Achmed Guns n Ammo
Ceo of all companies
[email protected]
[email protected]
آخرون من نفس المجموعة، وهم عبدالرؤوف الشايب
وسيد شرف الستري لاعتداء قوات الأمن أثناء تواجدهم في المطار، ويعتبر البعض ذلك
تصفية للحسابات قامت به
http://tweeter.com/achmedholdingsComment
-
-
Comment
-
lol i violated probation in 89 here in florida and they dont play. You violate no bond no nothing you locked up to sentence time....Icq 247-742-205Comment
-
so fucking lame. all i know is. money=power.=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Warriors come out to plaAAaayyy! 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Comment
-
i'm betting not much food was eaten in prison across the USA last two days and not much will be eaten for the next week or two LOL
she probally did more for prison BUDGETS than anyone knows - less food consumed means less expense. the amount of hunger striked will SOAR!!!
THANK YOU PARISThis dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
That's totally true. I know this from personal experience myself.
The fact that she even stayed out of jail till her court date amazes me. You lose all your rights when you take probation over a jail sentence.
Knowing what I know now, I'd way rather take a short stint in jail over a long sentence on probation. If the probation department plays the tune, you had better dance!Comment
-
Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.
She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.
The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.
She is a celebrity but she should not be treated differently than the average person would be and yet she has been. She has been treated worse because of her celebrity and was actually placed in maximum security (solitary confinement for her own protection) which is harsh and is usually reserved for problem inmates.Comment
-
if she was anyone else maybe she's one of the big time porn star
OnProbation Links Directory | OnProbation Design Services | OnProbation CashComment
-
With all the embarrassment this "IDIOTIC BITCH" has caused to the business end of the HILTON name, she should disinherited
Shooting Exclusive Content for over 16 years
You can reach me at [email protected]
I have survived in this industry shooting exclusive for 16 years.
Comment
-
You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.
I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.
I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.
What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?
We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
Seems that was Paris's idea, and not the judge's.
Anyone still thinking she's learned her lesson here?
The judge said he wasn't going to have any of that, and has sent a car to pick her up.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
Apparently painting the jail bars like penises didn't make her feel at home, at all... Poor girl... I hope she didn't hurt her teeth on them...
Ah, I love Sarah Silverman... Those who caught the highlights of the MTV Video Awards know what I'm talking about... haha
xXxComment
-
Comment
-
She's been caught a couple times already for driving with a suspended license. I believe this was her 3rd offense to it, and thus it goes to court for sentencing. Michelle Rodriguez only served a handful of hours in her sentence that was to be 10 days in jail.
For similar offenses, she has served what normal people serve behind bars for this, which is about 72hours.
The judge is pissed right now, because her leaving and going to house arrest was not brought to his attention considering he is still presiding over her.Formerly known as Adult Rental Chris
ICQ - 452-693-463 | Skype: xravagexComment
-
Why dont they just crash their cars and helicopters and planes into the damn house and free us from this bullshit? I mean christ. They broke into the paris hilton coverage a minute ago to announce that defense secretary Gates is replacing joint chief of staff general Pace.
TV "news" is just tabloid tv any more. They should all be reclassified as Entertainment networks IMHO. No more free ride until they cover NEWS goddamnit.43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Comment
-
I really don't care what happens to her but it needs to happen soon so the FIVE fucking helicopters will go away from over my place and the NB offices.
Yesterday we watched a news van trying to get a spot with the other four news vans slam into a car parked on Sunset. It's insane around here right now.The 2 rules for success:
1. Never reveal everything you know
2.Comment
-
You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."
I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.
I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.
What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?
We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.
Thank god someone here is talking some fucking sense. LOL .. For anyone's information on "summary" probation you do not have a PO but you agree to not commit any crimes. That includes speeding if the judge sees fit. Paris should be in jail for 45 days cause she was driving on a suspended because of a DUI. If her license was suspended for tickets or something like that then they would not have given her that. But they have specific punishments for DUI violators. I saw a guy get 5 years for a 5th DUI and he was sitting in his truck not moving. So give up the boo hoo shit for paris and let her serve time like the rest of us.
P.S.
She could have ordered Kosher meals in there they are a little better. At least you do not have to eat the pork they serve everyday.chAos
Email Solutions - Traffic - Domains
email: [email protected]
skype: marketingguruchaos
icq: 101955210Comment
-
if she's just an ordinary person no one will pay attention and doesn't give a damn to her...popularity counts...
she's in showbiz and a rich woman so what are we expecting for?..Last edited by carol.prime; 06-08-2007, 09:39 AM.Prime Outsourcing | offshore staffing solutions | manual labor | employee leasing |
full time employees starting at $695.00/month = managed and dedicated
icq.: 309570461 live chatComment
-
You are on crack:Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.
She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.
The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.
She is a celebrity but she should not be treated differently than the average person would be and yet she has been. She has been treated worse because of her celebrity and was actually placed in maximum security (solitary confinement for her own protection) which is harsh and is usually reserved for problem inmates.
http://www.snizzshare.com/view_video...70e9a56ceeabc4
Or maybe it's just me.Comment
-
Comment
-
You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."
She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.
I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.
You are not telling the whole story, and maybe were not told the whole story. There would not be any jail time for anyone with a first offense. So you are wrong.
The punishment is supposed to fit the crime and driving with a suspended license is not much of a crime.I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.
The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?
We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.
I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.Comment
-
if hilton was anyone else..it wouldn't be so hard to find a picture of her behind the bars..naked lol!Prime Outsourcing│offshore solutions│manual labor│staff leasing│full time employees
starting at $695.00/month=managed and dedicated | icq: 309570461 | live chatComment
-
Why don't you an Paris get a room? Driving on a suspended license is serious. Driving and violating parole / probabtion even more so.She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.
You are not telling the whole story, and maybe were not told the whole story. There would not be any jail time for anyone with a first offense. So you are wrong.
The punishment is supposed to fit the crime and driving with a suspended license is not much of a crime.
The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.
I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.Comment
-
I am not a fan of Paris and no, driving on a suspended license is not a serious offense and no, breaking summary probation is not a serious offense. Jail time is not usually given for driving on a suspended license and even if it is the outside range is normally no more than 72 hours max.Comment
-
I'm not sure what you're going on, but I'm going on the reports given in the last 24 hours from Los Angeles Country Prosecutors and criminal analysts. From what I read, they haven't heard of an inmate being released from custody for medical reasons in Los Angeles County before.... they've instead been transferred to medical facilities.She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.
Maybe you're right. I can only go on what I witnessed, what I was told, and what the cops said as they arrested my friend in front of me. it's possible I misunderstood what the police were saying, and my friend was less than honest with me because he was embarrassed or whatever - but I don't think so.
She was also violating her probation and driving recklessly... and - on a personal note - on a street that my girlfriend drives home on every night, against the redundant instructions of a court to her. I think that's a significant crime, myself. It's not like she's going to jail for years here - she's in and out inside a month due to her being advanced an early release due to expected good behavior (and I'm not going to even bother touching that one). The judge noticed a person that has shown time and time again that she has no respect for the system - he gave her chances, and she laughed at him for doing so - maybe it's time for her to learn a little respect - the judge certainly seems to think so.
Even with the proper paperwork, no sheriff has the right to overturn the ruling of a judge - and that's exactly what happened here. In this case, explicit instructions were given that were not followed. After having given those explicit instructions, the call is the judge's, not the sheriff's - regardless of what paperwork was filed or was not filed.The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.
I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.
The United States isn't a despotism.... yet.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-
Sarah killed it with that joke!Ross Horwitz
Skype: RossAngeles666
Online Ad Sales / Email / Display Ads / Mobile
Cell.323.949.4313
[email protected]Comment
-
The paper work is susposed to be filed with the Court to get Court approval, but because it has been so common over the years the paper work is not usually filed because most Judges simply do not interrfer with the Sheriff's decisions.Even with the proper paperwork, no sheriff has the right to overturn the ruling of a judge - and that's exactly what happened here. In this case, explicit instructions were given that were not followed. After having given those explicit instructions, the call is the judge's, not the sheriff's - regardless of what paperwork was filed or was not filed.
BTW, there has been in the past, people "released" from jail and from prison because of medical reasons, so that they may seek private treatment.Comment
-
I'm wondering how many of those 'common' cases dealt with the Sheriff violating an explicit order of the court, as this one did.
I have no doubt that the Sheriff makes calls that release people early or to house arrest every day... "released into the custody of the Sheriff's office" and all... but if the judge says "do not do this thing," the Sheriff isn't supposed to do that thing. The Sheriff operates at the behest of the courts - as, with the exception of "pardons," all members of the executive are supposed to.
I'm not saying it hasn't happened - I'm saying that County Criminal Analysts are saying that it hasn't happened for the term of a sentence in Los Angeles County... which seems to be at the heart of the issue here.-D.
ICQ: 202-96-31Comment
-

ICQ:407-837-607







Comment