Google hints at banning sites that buy links for SE rankings - GoFuckYourself.com

fetishblog · 06-05-2007, 11:44 AM

I was reading this article about the new search engine that CBS owns called Mahalo.com. All of the search result pages are hand made by a person. Well Matt Cutts, Google's Search Quality Engineer, was talking about the level of human interaction at Google, and then I saw this:

Quote:

Additional human interaction might come if Google decides to allow anyone to report people who buy links in order to try to improve their search rankings. "I wouldn't be surprised if we add something on the Webmaster console to report that," Cutts said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20...nfoworld/89077

KimJI · 06-05-2007, 11:51 AM

wont ever happend

MartiniGirl · 06-05-2007, 12:19 PM

Pure BS.

bobbyjuly · 06-05-2007, 12:21 PM

thats interesting!

RawAlex · 06-05-2007, 12:23 PM

It is an interesting threat, but the reality is that Google has steadfastly refused to do any human checking of links or SERPs, and they aren't going to suddenly hire thousands of people to deal with bogus complaints.

Google is "this close" to having totally irrelevant results in many of the major SERPs, putting them closer to losing their number one standing. They have way bigger issues to deal with than a few paid links.

AdamG · 06-05-2007, 02:25 PM

Interesting article, but it does not seem realistic for the moment

mattz · 06-05-2007, 02:27 PM

Even if it does happen, it's going to be hard as hell for them to tell if you bought a link

Kevsh · 06-05-2007, 02:43 PM

Google puts out so many false alarms, they must have graduated from the George W. Bush school of fear-mongering.

Simply put: It can't work.
Why not?

Scenario: I rank #2 for a hugely competitive keyword and similarly for a bunch of related words. I go and buy a text link for the #1 site from any of the hundreds of know paid link sites. I report it to Google. They get banned/penalized.

Is it worth it to buy a $5, $15, $50 link in hopes of getting my competitor penalized? Of course, if the result is I get top spot and thousands of extra visitors per day.

TheJimmy · 06-05-2007, 03:11 PM

old drama, was a bunch of shit talking a few weeks ago when Matt brought that up on his blog...

D · 06-05-2007, 03:22 PM

They could easily incorporate the number of complaints in the matrix determining the dominant eigenvalues so that it impacts someone's pagerank without the need of hiring a single additional staffer.

I imagine they could do that for any number of wiki-type inputs.

fuzebox · 06-05-2007, 03:37 PM

In most cases there'd be no way to prove the links were bought.

Such as with ours.

dcortez · 06-05-2007, 05:08 PM

They don't have to prove anything. All they need to do is suspect a site enough to dump it. It's their rules and it's not democratic.

"TrustRank" was a concept introduced to balance between algo and human qualification of links.

LinkStoppers for Google - that would be a hoot.

I wonder what the registrar spoofers are thinking now?

Did you invest in multiple class-C's to fake up your rankings. Hope they don't start compiling a list of known Class C's used for page rank manipulation.

Did you really think they would stop at link farms?

VexXxed · 06-05-2007, 05:27 PM

I guess that means everyone buying links through Adwords is gonna be banned.

chupacabra · 06-05-2007, 05:33 PM

don't see how it could be true, but i would welcome it... true and not 'purchased' relevance in search results would be a welcome thing to me..

dcortez · 06-05-2007, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VexXxed

I guess that means everyone buying links through Adwords is gonna be banned.

Does anyone actually net in black with adwords? How close are the margins?

Some of the SEO forums do talk about adwords links being valued differently.

global-girl · 06-08-2007, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevsh

Google puts out so many false alarms, they must have graduated from the George W. Bush school of fear-mongering.

06-05-2007, 12:19 PM	#3
MartiniGirl Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 183	Pure BS. __________________ PussyCash.com, you get the two best things in life: PUSSY & CA$H

06-05-2007, 12:21 PM	#4
bobbyjuly Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Atlanta Posts: 404	thats interesting! __________________ http://www.whoisnexxxt.com Where Adult Stars come to play!

06-05-2007, 02:25 PM	#6
AdamG Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 65	Interesting article, but it does not seem realistic for the moment __________________ www.CashAssociate.com The Ultimate PE Affiliate Program- 50% Commissions www.EuroExtender.com The Most Comfortable Penis Extender www.X4labs.com The Most Advanced Penis Traction Device ICQ 435701185 or rob [at] cashassociate.com

06-05-2007, 02:43 PM	#8
Kevsh Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: TO Posts: 8,619	Google puts out so many false alarms, they must have graduated from the George W. Bush school of fear-mongering. Simply put: It can't work. Why not? Scenario: I rank #2 for a hugely competitive keyword and similarly for a bunch of related words. I go and buy a text link for the #1 site from any of the hundreds of know paid link sites. I report it to Google. They get banned/penalized. Is it worth it to buy a $5, $15, $50 link in hopes of getting my competitor penalized? Of course, if the result is I get top spot and thousands of extra visitors per day. Last edited by Kevsh; 06-05-2007 at 02:45 PM..

06-05-2007, 03:11 PM	#9
TheJimmy ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0 Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 10,747	old drama, was a bunch of shit talking a few weeks ago when Matt brought that up on his blog... __________________ Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.

06-05-2007, 11:51 AM	#2
KimJI Confirmed User Join Date: May 2007 Location: So fucking gone Posts: 1,839	wont ever happend __________________ Trafficadept \| Best traffic I have ever tested \| web "@t" cuul.org

06-05-2007, 12:23 PM	#5
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	It is an interesting threat, but the reality is that Google has steadfastly refused to do any human checking of links or SERPs, and they aren't going to suddenly hire thousands of people to deal with bogus complaints. Google is "this close" to having totally irrelevant results in many of the major SERPs, putting them closer to losing their number one standing. They have way bigger issues to deal with than a few paid links.

06-05-2007, 02:27 PM	#7
mattz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: AZ Posts: 7,697	Even if it does happen, it's going to be hard as hell for them to tell if you bought a link

06-05-2007, 03:22 PM	#10
D Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Valley Posts: 7,412	They could easily incorporate the number of complaints in the matrix determining the dominant eigenvalues so that it impacts someone's pagerank without the need of hiring a single additional staffer. I imagine they could do that for any number of wiki-type inputs. __________________ -D. ICQ: 202-96-31

06-05-2007, 03:37 PM	#11
fuzebox making it rain Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: seattle Posts: 22,117	In most cases there'd be no way to prove the links were bought. Such as with ours.

06-05-2007, 05:08 PM	#12
dcortez DINO CORTEZ™ Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Vancouver Island Posts: 2,145	They don't have to prove anything. All they need to do is suspect a site enough to dump it. It's their rules and it's not democratic. "TrustRank" was a concept introduced to balance between algo and human qualification of links. LinkStoppers for Google - that would be a hoot. I wonder what the registrar spoofers are thinking now? Did you invest in multiple class-C's to fake up your rankings. Hope they don't start compiling a list of known Class C's used for page rank manipulation. Did you really think they would stop at link farms?

06-05-2007, 05:27 PM	#13
VexXxed Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: What Bitch? Posts: 544	I guess that means everyone buying links through Adwords is gonna be banned. __________________

06-05-2007, 05:33 PM	#14
chupacabra Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,626	don't see how it could be true, but i would welcome it... true and not 'purchased' relevance in search results would be a welcome thing to me.. __________________ ...promise her a defamation, tell her where the rain will fall..