Pop-up porn case to get new trial - GoFuckYourself.com

DVTimes · 06-07-2007, 07:23 AM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6729905.stm

A new trial has been ordered in a case that became an internet cause celebre.
It involves substitute teacher Julie Amero who faced a 40-year jail sentence for allegedly letting school children view pornography on a class computer.

The case generated huge interest online as bloggers and security experts challenged the way the trial of Ms Amero was being handled.

The new trial follows fresh analysis of why the PC at the centre of the allegations showed the explicit images.

Close examination

Connecticut supply teacher Julie Amero was convicted in January 2007 of impairing the morals of children but she has always strenuously denied visiting sites that would have led to the PC showing the images.

Ms Amero was due to be sentenced on 6 June but Superior Court Judge Hillary Strackbein instead called for a new trial. No date has been set for this second trial.

The case was subject to strong criticism by many bloggers, legal experts and security professionals.

The computer security researchers carried out an unpaid forensic examination of the PC at the centre of the case and what they found led them to doubt the version of events put forward by the prosecution.

This disparity led to Connecticut ordering new tests at a state forensics lab which backed the volunteers' findings and raised more questions about the reliability of the initial evidence.

Local newspapers in Norwich, Connecticut, reported Judge Strackbein saying: "The jury may have relied, at least in part, on that faulty information."

Ms Amero's supporters said the old PC lacked a firewall and security software which led many to suggest it had been taken over by spyware programs that were showing the unwanted pop-ups.

The defence lawyer for Ms Amero said that if the evidence found by its cadre of security researchers had been available at the initial trial, she would never have been accused of visiting pornographic sites.

"I had a great team behind me and I feel comfortable with the decision today," said Ms Amero after the hearing.

wild_s · 06-07-2007, 09:08 AM

That's awesome, and fuck those prudes for trying to steal up to 40 years of her life because some kids saw in class what they are seeing at home, at their friends, at the library... Fuck I hate the legal system in this country!

madawgz · 06-07-2007, 09:40 AM

hopefully she wont do any time...

GatorB · 06-07-2007, 09:48 AM

From what I read in another atricle they probably won't even bother to retry her.

sortie · 06-07-2007, 09:51 AM

The case was overkill from the start. There was no evidence of any malicious intent. At most this would have been accidental exposure and the reality is the maker of the spyware is the one who needs to be charged.

jacked · 06-07-2007, 09:56 AM

i'm sure scumware was behind it, sucks she had to be put through all the bullshit

Lance69 · 06-07-2007, 10:51 AM

Are you fucking kidding me? Wow just fuckin wow... In Connecticut too, sure this wasn't Iran?

06-07-2007, 07:23 AM	#1
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,613	Pop-up porn case to get new trial http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6729905.stm A new trial has been ordered in a case that became an internet cause celebre. It involves substitute teacher Julie Amero who faced a 40-year jail sentence for allegedly letting school children view pornography on a class computer. The case generated huge interest online as bloggers and security experts challenged the way the trial of Ms Amero was being handled. The new trial follows fresh analysis of why the PC at the centre of the allegations showed the explicit images. Close examination Connecticut supply teacher Julie Amero was convicted in January 2007 of impairing the morals of children but she has always strenuously denied visiting sites that would have led to the PC showing the images. Ms Amero was due to be sentenced on 6 June but Superior Court Judge Hillary Strackbein instead called for a new trial. No date has been set for this second trial. The case was subject to strong criticism by many bloggers, legal experts and security professionals. The computer security researchers carried out an unpaid forensic examination of the PC at the centre of the case and what they found led them to doubt the version of events put forward by the prosecution. This disparity led to Connecticut ordering new tests at a state forensics lab which backed the volunteers' findings and raised more questions about the reliability of the initial evidence. Local newspapers in Norwich, Connecticut, reported Judge Strackbein saying: "The jury may have relied, at least in part, on that faulty information." Ms Amero's supporters said the old PC lacked a firewall and security software which led many to suggest it had been taken over by spyware programs that were showing the unwanted pop-ups. The defence lawyer for Ms Amero said that if the evidence found by its cadre of security researchers had been available at the initial trial, she would never have been accused of visiting pornographic sites. "I had a great team behind me and I feel comfortable with the decision today," said Ms Amero after the hearing. __________________ My Sites

06-07-2007, 09:40 AM	#3
madawgz 8.8.8.8 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Noordermarkt Posts: 30,509	hopefully she wont do any time... __________________ TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

06-07-2007, 09:56 AM	#6
jacked sperm tail Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: nj Posts: 11,019	i'm sure scumware was behind it, sucks she had to be put through all the bullshit __________________ Got Cam Models? icq: 361-607-616

06-07-2007, 10:51 AM	#7
Lance69 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver BC Posts: 2,266	Are you fucking kidding me? Wow just fuckin wow... In Connecticut too, sure this wasn't Iran? __________________ Sonarcash Competitive Content Shooting Handgasm HD Handjobs Janessa Jordan Ultimate Wife Make Money Fucking Blog ICQ: 307 975 028 lance {at} sonarcash {dot} com (<- Need amateur content? Email or ICQ)

06-07-2007, 09:08 AM	#2
wild_s Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 36	That's awesome, and fuck those prudes for trying to steal up to 40 years of her life because some kids saw in class what they are seeing at home, at their friends, at the library... Fuck I hate the legal system in this country!

06-07-2007, 09:48 AM	#4
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	From what I read in another atricle they probably won't even bother to retry her.

06-07-2007, 09:51 AM	#5
sortie Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 7,771	The case was overkill from the start. There was no evidence of any malicious intent. At most this would have been accidental exposure and the reality is the maker of the spyware is the one who needs to be charged.