I'm trying to drop it but now you have pissed me off.




If you pulled them before I made the post then how did I get this screen cap? Rut roh....Was JTF just caught in a lie? :1orglaugh

You started a thread using the name of a model I work with to draw attention. Then you failed to produce a pic of the model you were comparing her to. How fair is that?

This is the best part:

[11:23] jimthefiend: not to post picks i dont even have a signed release for yet
[11:24] jimthefiend: you of all people should know better

http://aaron-matthews.com/pics/JimsTrashModel.jpg

Yeah she looks very young.

I've got shittloads of domains I can post this from. If any particular mod would like to tell me why they are banning my URL and or ask me to stop then I would listen to them. I will NOT listen to Jim though.

keep on dreaming.......

she looks young but not sure if compared to Little Lupe, it's hard to say.

Aaron is a fucking petulant little idiot. I was in no way insulting Lupe (and I honestly didnt even know she was "his"). No one cares anyway.

I was making a simple comparison of the relative appearance in age, which is inarguable.

Let the fat ass have his little hissy fit. It's his life, don't ya know.






Just be sure and note this BEFORE you ever contact Aaron for an opinion. He's not to be trusted and I'm having SERIOUS doubts about his so called profesionalism.

So here's how this is going to work.....

It's obvious that Jim has no fucking clue how the adult business works. You don't have pics of a naked girl if you don't have a release. He claims that he has ID and 2257 docs..bla bla bla. What kind of idiot would get that stuff but no release?

This tells me that Jim probably DOES NOT have proof that this model is of legal age so it's in the best interest of GFY for me to remove the image from my server. I love GFY and would hate to create a legal problem FOR THEM or myself by posting a screen cap of possible CP that Jim had on his server.

Says the guy who has naked pics of a model with no release.

Yep...You're opinion matters. :thumbsup :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So... if a girl is as developed as you'd expect a 13 year old to be, or what you remember it to be when you were a 15 year old dating a girl 2 years younger, does this type of content appeal to pedos???

What would GFY be without AaronM or Jimthefiend?

Of course it does. That's why I didn't get so eager to post it. I got a few BAD sample pics and showed a few people to see what they thought. The end decision was that I decided against even REFERRING her to anyone. Not my bag.

Aaron is just being a prick, but then again he's real sensitive on this appealing to pedos issue because, well you know. I have no problem with Lupe but Aaron took the whole thing personally.

http://www.aguiguy.com/images/ruhroh.jpg

That bitch was ugly anyway...

Yeah you're right. She wasnt NEARLY as hot as this broad:

http://www.blackvaginafinder.com/tgp.../crunchy11.jpg

At least that broad was an ADULT!

On one hand, why should YOU feel bad about posting the pics at all, if she's legal? It's not like you're out there saying "WOW LOOK AT THIS GIRL SHE IS SO HOT!!!!" even though she is very under-developed. You know this girl would make a TON of signups and that's all 99% of webmasters care about. The colour of pedo money is no different than money from sales from a MILF site. As long as the girl is 18+, even if she's on crack and doing this to support her baby and suitcase pimp, that's her problem, not mine or ours!

Yeah, I had a gf when I was 15 who was more developed than that girl, so yeah I'd say that is 100% catering to pedos. Adult really leaves very little room for anyone with morals to make any money as this business.

On the other hand, knowing that the people are signing up because of their lust for under age girls, does that irk you? Personally I know there are a LOT of sick fxcking bastards out there. People have ever fetish under the sun, and whether or not I make money off it is not going to stop them or change them from wrong to right. Who decides what is wrong or right anyways? I would say that anything where the person is too young to be aware of what they're doing is abuse. In that case, it's probably fair to say that even 18-19 year olds in this business have no idea what they're getting involved with.

On that note, it's also comical that in the US you can't drink until you're 21, but you can join the army and kill people, or sell your body to pornographers. LOL!!!

I haven't promoted Little Lupe because I just felt that if anyone I knew saw me working on a Little Lupe ad they'd think I was a pedo. My current gf saw the site and she thought it was CP hands down, I had to explain to her it was legal. She was pissed!

Ehhh... maybe I'll put up Little Lupe on newpornchicks.com and see how it does.

I love how you fail miserably at twisting things.

FACT: You freaked out when pics of an underage looking girl were posted from YOUR server.

FACT: You have no release for the pics.

FACT: You tried to pull rank and have my domain blocked from GFY.

FACT: You're a sore loser.

FACT: The girl was ugly at best.

And lastly....

FACT: I never took anything personally except you trying getting TexasDreams to continue to abuse his mod status. No worries though...He'll be gone shortly. :glugglug


I'm off to have lunch with my girly girl. Have fun kicking your dog, Jim.

Careful, or you'll get you know who on your ass.



The reasons I didn't post them myself were that I wasn't sure I wanted to be associated with that niche, the pics sucked and I don't have a release to use them. I made the STUPID mistake of assuming that Aaron could be trusted to render an honest opinion without immediately trying to stir drama and sig views on the boards about it. My bad.

I should have known better and trusting Aaron farther than I can throw him is not a mistake I will EVER repeat.

Naaa, even if someone called me out for my statement, I'm not worried. It is my opinion, like yours, that people *will* think less of me for promoting that niche.

I don't think anyone who sells this stuff is bad, I never said anything like that. I'm just saying that I'm not comfortable with what my friends outside the industry would think of me if they saw that stuff on my sites.

I know it's 100% legit, 100% legal, but other people might not know that. That's my concern.

Hey Jim, got any solo girls you wanna sell on newpornchicks.com ? ;)

Just these. :)

Carmen Hart
Jenna Jameson
Jessica Drake
Julia Ann
Kaylani Lei
Keri Sable
Kirsten Price
Stormy Daniels

Wicked Girls
Wicked Pictures

Wicked Scenes





I do have a few on the hook who might be looking for work, I'll see whats up. I'm shooting this NICE redhead Friday.

Lupe looks young to me, but she doesn't look like a kid. I've never really understood what all the fuss was about.

guess i missed the pics

Man what a RollerCoaster ride this thread is

Ok ok ok.. THanks for sharing anyway.. lol

Damn I missed all the drama. :(

Totally agree... she looks to me like your normal, petite 19 or 20-year-old. I guess living in latin america, you see lots of adult girls who have little packages, and I don't see anything "pedo" in that.

didnt aaronm threaten to sue SOS when he hotlinked a pic or 2 off aarons server?

You're kidding me.

I missed the damn bus... last time I checked, there was this pic of some grizzly old man, now its supposedly some girl?

Whisky Tango Foxtrot?

All of this because of young looking chicks.

DAYUM!!!!!!

LOLOLOLOL