Message to Moderators: Remove CP threads please - GoFuckYourself.com

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:31 PM

Today there are a couple of very suspect threads that may contain CP related items, I know one for sure has a CP picture in it this thread here:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726269

The other one if it turns out to be true someone posted a link to a video of a singer molesting a 14 year old girl here:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726313

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 07:32 PM

How is a fully clothed child CP? Even a nude child is not necesarily considered cp.

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:33 PM

While you're at it, can you please rename the "User CP" link, that's treading on dangerous grounds right there.

Fuck I just lost my own contest.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

How is a fully clothed child CP? Even a nude child is not necesarily considered cp.

Dude you didnt see that picture of a NAKED WOMAN spreading her pussy lips and a CHILD right next to her?! Dont be a sicko that is CLEARLY illegal.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

While you're at it, can you please rename the "User CP" link, that's treading on dangerous grounds right there. Fuck I just lost my own contest.

You motherfuckers think this is a joke but seriously this isnt funny and people should be extremely careful when posting images and videos that deal with children under 18 on an ADULT PORN WEBMASTER MESSAGE BOARD.

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Dude you didnt see that picture of a NAKED WOMAN spreading her pussy lips and a CHILD right next to her?! Dont be a sicko that is CLEARLY illegal.

Care to point out the part of the law that's in violation of?

pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE · 04-21-2007, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You motherfuckers think this is a joke but seriously this isnt funny and people should be extremely careful when posting images and videos that deal with children under 18 on an ADULT PORN WEBMASTER MESSAGE BOARD.

youre a retard

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You motherfuckers think this is a joke but seriously this isnt funny and people should be extremely careful when posting images and videos that deal with children under 18 on an ADULT PORN WEBMASTER MESSAGE BOARD.

No, actually, we just think you're a joke.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Care to point out the part of the law that's in violation of?

THE WOMAN IS NUDE SPREADING HER PUSSY LIPS IN A SEXUAL POSE NEXT TO A CHILD!!!!!

Dude wtf is wrong with you?

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

No, actually, we just think you're a joke.

Are you sticking up for CP? Id be VERY careful with your answer in this thread, especially that you run an adult program? Are you fucking kidding me?

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Are you sticking up for CP? Id be VERY careful with your answer in this thread, especially that you run an adult program? Are you fucking kidding me?

No, I was saying that you are a joke, I thought it was quite clear.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

No, I was saying that you are a joke, I thought it was quite clear.

Yes thats what I thought now move along this is a serious thread and I am pretty sure you dont want to play in here.

Pleasurepays · 04-21-2007, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

THE WOMAN IS NUDE SPREADING HER PUSSY LIPS IN A SEXUAL POSE NEXT TO A CHILD!!!!!

Dude wtf is wrong with you?

retard,

although what she is doing is wrong and probably an illegal thing to do where she resides... the pic itself is not illegal.

you are without a doubt one of the dumbest and most annoying people to ever post in this forum in recent times. a mindless kid, probably not even 18 trying to boost his own self image by baiting people into moronic discussion and arguments.

good job stirring up unwanted and unneeded fake controversy and attention about illegal content... google appreciates it. stupid fucking jackass.

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Yes thats what I thought now move along this is a serious thread and I am pretty sure you dont want to play in here.

Yes, everyone is obviously taking this thread, or any of your worthless drivel threads, seriously. Nothing gets by you does it?

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

although what she is doing is wrong and probably an illegal thing to do where she resides... the pic itself is not illegal.

Thanks for clarifying what you do and dont think are illegal when it comes to CP, duly noted.
You are seriously retarded if you dont think the feds would come after you for posting a picture like that.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Yes, everyone is obviously taking this thread, or any of your worthless drivel threads, seriously. Nothing gets by you does it?

If you dont think CP on an adult webmaster board is serious, I fear for your affiliates.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

good job stirring up unwanted and unneeded fake controversy and attention about illegal content...

Are you saying that ISNT a CP image? Choose your words carefully.

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You are seriously retarded if you dont think the feds would come after you for posting a picture like that.

That pic is probably at least a year old and has been posted at least 3 other times on here.

mattz · 04-21-2007, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Thanks for clarifying what you do and dont think are illegal when it comes to CP, duly noted.
You are seriously retarded if you dont think the feds would come after you for posting a picture like that.

aico · 04-21-2007, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

If you dont think CP on an adult webmaster board is serious, I fear for your affiliates.

CP on an adult webmaster board, and you being a complete fucking idiot, have nothing to do with each other.

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 07:58 PM

Title 18 of the United States Code governs child pornography. See Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. 18 U.S.C. § 2256 defines "Child pornography" as:

"any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . ."

Here's the important part since you probably don't understand all the words: "a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct "

That child is appearing in a picture by accident and ENGAGING in sexually explicit conduct.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

That child is appearing in a picture by accident and ENGAGING in sexually explicit conduct.

The woman is in a sexual pose, I cant believe you are defending that CP image Daymon.
You think the feds would agree with your interpretation?

I dont think its something Playboy wants on its servers and I am simply asking the moderators to take a look at those threads for possible CP.

This doesnt concern you and if you would like to argue with TexasDreams about what is and isnt CP be my guest I am just trying to look out for GFY.

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 08:04 PM

How is that child engaging in anything? You're too stupid for words.

SomeCreep · 04-21-2007, 08:06 PM

This thread needs a fart. Actually many.

aico · 04-21-2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Title 18 of the United States Code governs child pornography. See Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. 18 U.S.C. § 2256 defines "Child pornography" as:

"any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . ."

Here's the important part since you probably don't understand all the words: "a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct "

That child is appearing in a picture by accident and ENGAGING in sexually explicit conduct.

Beat me to it...

Splum · 04-21-2007, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

How is that child engaging in anything? You're too stupid for words.

You are defending CP images and you call me *stupid*?

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

You are defending CP images and you call me *stupid*?

It's not CP .. I didn't write the laws and I'm sorry you can't understand them, but that doesn't change the facts here.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

It's not CP .. I didn't write the laws and I'm sorry you can't understand them, but that doesn't change the facts here.

Says a guy with a website named teeniegirlgalleries.com and lives in Costa Rica. I understand you are trying to be a rebel and say fuck the laws of the United States of America but GFY is NOT the place to be posting images like that and I am pretty sure the mods will agree.

However we can test your theory away from GFY if you want to, just post that image on your website and we shall see who is right.

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Says a guy with a website named teeniegirlgalleries.com and lives in Costa Rica. I understand you are trying to be a rebel and say fuck the laws of the United States of America but GFY is NOT the place to be posting images like that and I am pretty sure the mods will agree.

However we can test your theory away from GFY if you want to, just post that image on your website and we shall see who is right.

I'm not trying to be a rebel. I'm just reading the laws which seem pretty clear. Are you really this slow? I mean, it's an act right?

Splum · 04-21-2007, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

I'm not trying to be a rebel. I'm just reading the laws which seem pretty clear. Are you really this slow? I mean, it's an act right?

Again if your interpretation of the law is so clear you will have no problem putting that image on your website right? Yeah I didnt think so.

There is not a judge in the world that wouldnt prosecute you for distributing that image.

Daymon, please check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Webby · 04-21-2007, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

Are you really this slow? I mean, it's an act right?

Seriously... na, I doubt it is an act *lol* - just genuinely totally clueless, but with a "need" to attract attention to make up for the character deficiencies

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Again if your interpretation of the law is so clear you will have no problem putting that image on your website right? Yeah I didnt think so.

There is not a judge in the world that wouldnt prosecute you for distributing that image.

Daymon, please check yourself before you wreck yourself.

I'm not going to jump because you tell me to. Really, I don't have to prove to you that you're wrong because you're wrong either way.

Instead, how about you just answer my original question? How is that child engaging in sexual behavior? Really it's a simple question.

Splum · 04-21-2007, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

I'm not going to jump because you tell me to. Really, I don't have to prove to you that you're wrong because you're wrong either way.

Instead, how about you just answer my original question? How is that child engaging in sexual behavior? Really it's a simple question.

The WOMAN IS engaging in sexual behavior.
Dude you are fucking retarded if you think an image of a guy masturbating with a child next to him isnt illegal, frankly you are more than retarded you are fucking sick if you think that image is legal.

So its ok to post it on GFY but not your own website?

WarChild · 04-21-2007, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

The WOMAN IS engaging in sexual behavior.
Dude you are fucking retarded if you think an image of a guy masturbating with a child next to him isnt illegal, frankly you are more than retarded you are fucking sick if you think that image is legal.

So its ok to post it on GFY but not your own website?

Sigh, I don't know why I even argue with you. READ THE LAW. It CLEARLY says of a CHILD engaging. It doesn't say anything about a child appearing in a frame where someone ELSE is engaging in ...

I'll make you a deal. I'll upload it to my server, but when I do you have to start a thread acusing me publically of being a child pornographer. At least that way we can get rid of you around here. Deal?

Pleasurepays · 04-21-2007, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Are you saying that ISNT a CP image? Choose your words carefully.

of course its not, you fucking moron. its a pic of a very irresponsible adult.
stop lowering the IQ of this forum. jesus. seriously. you are totally fucking the curve up for the entire adult industry.

a photo of an illegal act does not constitute an illegal photo.

this forum will be a better place when you mom finally realizes you are posting here and grounds you.

Webby · 04-21-2007, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild

S
I'll make you a deal. I'll upload it to my server, but when I do you have to start a thread acusing me publically of being a child pornographer. At least that way we can get rid of you around here. Deal?

Damn... Splum has obviously overlooked your very fair offer

GAMEFINEST · 04-21-2007, 10:10 PM

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Aric · 04-21-2007, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

a mindless kid, probably not even 18 trying to boost his own self image by baiting people into moronic discussion and arguments.

he's a master baiter

marcjacob · 04-21-2007, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

this forum will be a better place when you mom finally realizes you are posting here and grounds you.

uno · 04-21-2007, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Damn... Splum has obviously overlooked your very fair offer

Did you expect anything more?

Mr Pheer · 04-21-2007, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

I am just trying to look out for GFY.

If that were true, you'd go away.

Webby · 04-21-2007, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

Did you expect anything more?

Not a lot!

Sysgenix · 04-21-2007, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

THE WOMAN IS NUDE SPREADING HER PUSSY LIPS IN A SEXUAL POSE NEXT TO A CHILD!!!!!

Dude wtf is wrong with you?

Splum take a hike you post geek.

Persius · 04-22-2007, 12:01 AM

geta life splum

King Adam · 04-22-2007, 12:07 AM

Just curious .... but how is the link to the 14 year old getting her dance on with Akon considered CP?

Am I missing something?

Scootermuze · 04-22-2007, 06:09 AM

If there were laws to cover such a pic, they would pertain to lewd acts in the presence of a minor... not cp..

Scootermuze · 04-22-2007, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornopete

The moderators know how to do their job. They don't need you.

Please don't tell him that.. he thinks he has a purpose in life..

WarChild · 04-22-2007, 06:44 AM

Wow sure got quiet after my offer.

nico-t · 04-22-2007, 07:11 AM

another moronic splum thread

nico-t · 04-22-2007, 07:11 AM

i mean 50 moronic splum threads

04-21-2007, 07:31 PM	#1
Splum Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 6,195	Message to Moderators: Remove CP threads please Today there are a couple of very suspect threads that may contain CP related items, I know one for sure has a CP picture in it this thread here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726269 The other one if it turns out to be true someone posted a link to a video of a singer molesting a 14 year old girl here: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726313

04-21-2007, 07:32 PM	#2
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	How is a fully clothed child CP? Even a nude child is not necesarily considered cp. __________________ .

04-21-2007, 07:58 PM	#21
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	Title 18 of the United States Code governs child pornography. See Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. 18 U.S.C. § 2256 defines "Child pornography" as: "any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where - (A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . ." Here's the important part since you probably don't understand all the words: *"a minor engaging* in sexually explicit conduct "** That child is appearing in a picture by accident and ENGAGING in sexually explicit conduct. __________________ .

04-21-2007, 08:04 PM	#23
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	How is that child engaging in anything? You're too stupid for words. __________________ .

04-21-2007, 08:06 PM	#24
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	This thread needs a fart. Actually many. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

04-21-2007, 07:33 PM	#3
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	While you're at it, can you please rename the "User CP" link, that's treading on dangerous grounds right there. Fuck I just lost my own contest.

04-21-2007, 10:10 PM	#37
GAMEFINEST Make STACK$ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: sexy time Posts: 14,439	ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo __________________ Compound interest.

04-22-2007, 12:01 AM	#44
Persius Tap into MOBILE! Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Hollywood Posts: 11,779	geta life splum

04-22-2007, 12:07 AM	#45
King Adam Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Valley of the Sun Posts: 5,408	Just curious .... but how is the link to the 14 year old getting her dance on with Akon considered CP? Am I missing something? __________________ TWISTYSCASH.com - Proven to be One of the BEST Adult Programs Around Promote These Sites : Twistys ~ Busty Ones ~ Nicole Graves ICQ : 9 6 4 4 0 2 2 1

04-22-2007, 06:09 AM	#46
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	If there were laws to cover such a pic, they would pertain to lewd acts in the presence of a minor... not cp..

04-22-2007, 06:44 AM	#48
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	Wow sure got quiet after my offer. __________________ .

04-22-2007, 07:11 AM	#49
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	another moronic splum thread