looking for into / research that counters anti-porn laws | groups | arguments

Porn is now a part of mainstream culture: paris hilton, pam anderson, janet jackson, girls next door, girls gone wild. You can order porn in the Marriott and at home via satellite or cable TV.

Obscenity is vague and unconstitutional in that it is undefined what constitutes a violation, and the standard is arbitrary and capricious.

Obscenity is prosecuted unevenly and for political purposes, which undermines its authority.

The connection between porn --and violence against women or children --is unproven.

Sex is accepted by doctors as medically healthy.

We went to court here in Canada a few years ago to defend our BDSM and watersports content against obscenity.

Our lawyer used expert witnesses on issues of pornography and mental health as well as exhaustively demonstrating the pervasiveness of this kind of material in modern society in general.

You may be interested in reading the judge's decision:

Sweet Entertainment Legal Verdict

Not sure... are you looking for stuff like that?

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_ar...y_rape_jp.html
http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/p...kutchinsky.pdf
http://www.marciapally.com/Pages/sxsn.html

Thanks for all replies thus far. The medical / professional research is primarily what I am looking for to support the arguments presented.

I am pretty up on the constitutionality aspect ... I became an expert after being federally indicted in 2003 for obscenity related charges. But there is a lack of published medical research supporting the notion that pornography doesn't contribute to the "unraveling of the moral fabric of society" or whatever they said I was responsible for. And it?s not because it isn?t there ... it?s just not politically correct to sign your name to anything that so many consider to be tabu. Especially after seeing what it did to the attorney general's career who suggested otherwise.

Thanks again for the info ... any more input on the topic is welcome.