What resolution do you solo girls post your pics at? - GoFuckYourself.com

DirtyDave · 04-03-2007, 09:02 AM

I'm building a site for a new solo girl site but she can't decide what size pics she wants to put in the members area.

What do users want:

Post as big a image as possible and let the user scroll his browser for every image?
Post a image for a certain size monitor (like a 700 line image)

Also, if you size an image so that they don't have to scroll; how do you handle the difference between horizontal and vertical images? A horizontal wil fit but a vertical will be too long and require scrolling.

Thankx.

DeanCapture · 04-03-2007, 09:20 AM

I think the standard is 1000 to 1200 pixels on the longest side. Most of my clients who have given me access to their members area are using those resolutions. Some sites offer a medium size as well as a larger size image.

Shoehorn! · 04-03-2007, 11:07 AM

1024x768 is pretty standard. Also depending on what kind of CMS you are running you will likely have the option of offering several different sizes that the surfer can choose from.

Shoehorn! · 04-03-2007, 11:07 AM

Whoops, double post.

NaughtyRob · 04-03-2007, 11:24 AM

I put them 1200x800

NaughtyRob · 04-03-2007, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn!

1024x768 is pretty standard. Also depending on what kind of CMS you are running you will likely have the option of offering several different sizes that the surfer can choose from.

I dont think 1024 is standard anymore. I see most sites using 1200 or bigger.

Mutt · 04-03-2007, 12:27 PM

1200x800 but i've gotten quite a few members emails asking for bigger - next site i'll do 1200x800 and the huge 3200 pixels long side or whatever they come out of the camera at.

aimeesweet · 04-03-2007, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn!

1024x768 is pretty standard. Also depending on what kind of CMS you are running you will likely have the option of offering several different sizes that the surfer can choose from.

I think offering a few sizes is best too...

donkevlar · 04-03-2007, 01:00 PM

Give people choices. It doesn't take much effort and you'll please everyone.

commonsense · 04-03-2007, 01:28 PM

Don't be a cheap ass. Buy a few memberships and do some research. 22% of all sologirl sales are from other sites shopping the competition

jact · 04-03-2007, 01:29 PM

I've seen some still doing 640x480, it's fucking sad.

Edit: In their members areas, as the only resolution available...

DirtyDave · 04-04-2007, 12:29 AM

I don't really see the point in even having images of a higher resolution than your monitor, either horizontal or vetical. It just gets resized to fit unless you want to spend all day scrolling so you can see the whole image.

I run 1920x1200. Anything larger than ~1100 in height is of no use to me. The only use I can think of is so that you can crop the image to only what you want.

BigBen · 04-04-2007, 12:41 AM

What about displaying different sizes dynamically by detecting the browser resolution, but still allowing the member to choose a different default size?

04-03-2007, 09:02 AM	#1
DirtyDave Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: TX Posts: 198	What resolution do you solo girls post your pics at? I'm building a site for a new solo girl site but she can't decide what size pics she wants to put in the members area. What do users want: Post as big a image as possible and let the user scroll his browser for every image? Post a image for a certain size monitor (like a 700 line image) Also, if you size an image so that they don't have to scroll; how do you handle the difference between horizontal and vertical images? A horizontal wil fit but a vertical will be too long and require scrolling. Thankx. __________________ DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour Model

04-03-2007, 09:20 AM	#2
DeanCapture Haters & Trolls SUCK! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 9,275	I think the standard is 1000 to 1200 pixels on the longest side. Most of my clients who have given me access to their members area are using those resolutions. Some sites offer a medium size as well as a larger size image. __________________ Twitter: @DeanCapture Instagram: @TheDeanCapture DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

04-03-2007, 11:07 AM	#3
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	1024x768 is pretty standard. Also depending on what kind of CMS you are running you will likely have the option of offering several different sizes that the surfer can choose from. __________________ Last edited by Shoehorn!; 04-03-2007 at 11:08 AM..

04-03-2007, 11:07 AM	#4
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	Whoops, double post. __________________ Last edited by Shoehorn!; 04-03-2007 at 11:08 AM..

04-03-2007, 11:24 AM	#5
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	I put them 1200x800 __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

04-03-2007, 12:27 PM	#7
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	1200x800 but i've gotten quite a few members emails asking for bigger - next site i'll do 1200x800 and the huge 3200 pixels long side or whatever they come out of the camera at. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

04-03-2007, 01:00 PM	#9
donkevlar Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 4,325	Give people choices. It doesn't take much effort and you'll please everyone. __________________ [email protected]

04-03-2007, 01:28 PM	#10
commonsense So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,790	Don't be a cheap ass. Buy a few memberships and do some research. 22% of all sologirl sales are from other sites shopping the competition

04-03-2007, 01:29 PM	#11
jact Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Canada Posts: 9,134	I've seen some still doing 640x480, it's fucking sad. Edit: In their members areas, as the only resolution available... __________________ Free agent

04-04-2007, 12:29 AM	#12
DirtyDave Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: TX Posts: 198	I don't really see the point in even having images of a higher resolution than your monitor, either horizontal or vetical. It just gets resized to fit unless you want to spend all day scrolling so you can see the whole image. I run 1920x1200. Anything larger than ~1100 in height is of no use to me. The only use I can think of is so that you can crop the image to only what you want. __________________ DelanyDecolleur.com :: Satin and Nylon Nude Glamour Model

04-04-2007, 12:41 AM	#13
BigBen Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: scv Posts: 2,299	What about displaying different sizes dynamically by detecting the browser resolution, but still allowing the member to choose a different default size?