![]() |
Maybe the problem is something else entirely, namely the unlikelihood that when ratios are 1:500 or whatever, there really is the consistency which people claim.
As anyone who bets colors in roulette knows, near-even chances "cluster". You don't just see red-black-red-black, but frequent runs of a single color. If we know that, perhaps from experience, how do we kid ourselves that it is reasonable to expect greater consistency from odds as long as conversion rates commonly represent? If a sponsor converts over a year at a given ratio, unless you are sending a huge amount of traffic, it wouldn't be surprizing if not a single month matched that annual rate. If you really do have a sponsor converting at normal (low) ratios who is reporting consistent stats month in and month out, that is the sponsor of whom I would suspicious. |
part could be the return visitors.
|
Quote:
Sounds like these "heavy hitters" need to promote my sites! Seriously http://www.HowIgotRich.com is no joke, everyone should be getting a check from me :) All of my top affiliates have been very consistent with sales, for years. The ones that are always chasing something "new" seem to be the ones with very irregular conversions. Quote:
No tour updates = fewer sales werd |
Quote:
|
PS - conversion ratio is a function of traffic source, period. Given the proper source of traffic, any site could convert at 1:50 (given stable hosting and processing).
|
two words
Spy + Ware |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Conversion ratio is a function of several different things. A link that says "click here for more free videos" will convert at a drastically different ratio than a link that says "click here to join for 2.95 with a major credit card".....regardless of traffic source. Also, to be perfectly fair I'm not comparing program A's ratios with program B's. I'm comparing sales volume on program A in weeks 1 & 2 to sales volume on program A in weeks 3 and beyond. :2 cents: |
If shaving is as common as you say, why are more sponsors not caught doing it? There is no shave function in CCBill / NATS, which leaves it to the sponsor to mess with the actual join links on the site. Surely someone would notice crap like that?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
First off - just because a program doesnt have it built in doesnt stop any aff program from hiring a programmer - any good programmer worth their salt knows how to integrate code that can be built right in Second - how many times a day do you check the join links? Do you think people sit there clearing cookies and reloading join pages all day to catch someone - not gonna happen Third - in response to the comment Lenny makes about the special day promotions - you are correct it is a great way to get new affiliates - but think about the person that has been an affiliate for 5 years - do you think they have any reason to not ratchet down their sales - while ramping up the new joined WMs for just the effect you described originally :) |
Quote:
I was under the impression that it was your site. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123