LCD or Plasma? - GoFuckYourself.com

Sid70 · 03-05-2007, 07:30 AM

37" 1300 res LCD or 42" 1024 res Plasma.... which one is better ??

hzoltan · 03-05-2007, 07:42 AM

LCD
plasma is dead

kowalsky · 03-05-2007, 07:45 AM

Everyone says LCD is better, there are many reason for that, I don´t remember anyone.

Elly Vaine · 03-05-2007, 07:47 AM

I have Lcd as TV and Plasma on laptop.
From what i know, most of people prefere Lcd instead of Plasma. I like my Lcd tv.

Elly Jaine

FlowerKid · 03-05-2007, 07:47 AM

Go for a 50" plasma with a resolution of 1366x768. It's also perfect to connect a PC to it with a media center software.

Violetta · 03-05-2007, 07:48 AM

you cant tell the difference...

cranki · 03-05-2007, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elly Jaine

I have Lcd as TV and Plasma on laptop.
From what i know, most of people prefere Lcd instead of Plasma. I like my Lcd tv.

Elly Jaine

which notebooks have plasma screens?

DutchTeenCash · 03-05-2007, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elly Jaine

I have Lcd as TV and Plasma on laptop.
From what i know, most of people prefere Lcd instead of Plasma. I like my Lcd tv.

Elly Jaine

err plasma on a laptop?

MikeVega · 03-05-2007, 07:56 AM

i have 2 LCD tvs and 2 Plasma Tvs . the Plasma Tv has better color.

Angelo22 · 03-05-2007, 07:58 AM

Plasma have been proven to deterioriorate their quality in a short time... So i guess LCD

Jensen · 03-05-2007, 07:58 AM

According to Synovate research participants: (UK, France and Germany)

65% favour Plasma over LCD for best Colour Quality

61% say Plasma delivers the best Sharpness Quality

62% indicate that Plasma has the best Response Time

72% deem Plasma to have the best Black Quality performance

---

facts and myths:

Response time (Motion)

Myth
Flat TVs have trouble retaining resolution when displaying fast moving images.

Fact
Plasma TVs can present moving objects without loss of crispness or detail.Plasma technology needs only one impulse per pixel to produce an image therefore its response time is almost instantaneous.

LCD technology requires pixels to go from active ? to inactive -and back to active again, to achieve a single response cycle; their response time can measure anywhere between 4 milliseconds to and 25 milliseconds. Even the fastest LCD screens can suffer with some degree of movement blurring.

Viewing angle

Myth
Flat TVs have poor viewing angles, meaning pictures lose much of their quality unless you?re sat directly in front of the screen.

Fact
Plasma TVs can actually be watched from very wide viewing angles without any significant loss in colour or contrast, thanks to the fact that they emit light directly from each of their screen cells or pixels.

However, LCD pixels merely ?pass on? a light originating from a single point behind them, therefore LCD screens can lose contrast and colour if watched from angles as small as 45 degrees.

Screen burn

Myth
Plasma TVs are seriously prone to burn in.

Fact
In the early days, plasma TVs were susceptible to screen burn. However, this issue has been largely eliminated thanks to greater use of built-in screen-saving systems and major phosphors improvements.

Example
You can now play computer games or watch logo-heavy channels (e.g. CNN) on a plasma TV without worrying about various static image elements being on the screen for a long period of time.

Energy use

Myth
Plasma TVs use more power than their LCD rivals.

Fact
The reality is that plasma TVs don?t necessarily use any more power than LCDs ? a fact which makes perfect sense if you think about how each technology works.

Plasma TVs, for instance, require just a single ignition of a plasma cell to cause a pixel to illuminate. Since darkness is achieved in plasma pixels by stopping electrical current getting into them, it follows that plasma TVs need relatively little power to reproduce dark scenes.

LCDs by comparison run at a constant power regardless of whether a scene is dark or light, due to their use of an always-on backlight.

Results from an independent research conducted by the AVT.O.P. Messetechnik laboratory in Germany, showed that plasmas tend to use the same ? and sometimes less ? amounts of power than LCD screens.

Lifespan

Myth
Plasma screens have a shorter lifespan than LCD screens.

Fact
Plasma TVs actually have a lifespan that?s at least equal to that of LCD TVs. TVs using either technology will provide at least 60,000 hours of life under normal viewing conditions before they lose more than half their original brightness. This translates to 27 years of continuous viewing for six hours a day.

Plasma screens can actually be made to last even longer depending on the picture settings you use. For instance, keeping the contrast low could potentially extend a plasma screen?s life.

End to end production

Myth
Plasma and LCD TVs alike are built using bits and pieces sourced from a variety of different manufacturers.

Fact
Generally, Plasma TVs tend to be developed and built completely ?in-house?.

In the early days of plasma TV, most manufacturers tended to develop their own plasma research and technology, leading to a situation where many companies now have plasma production as an integrated business model. This means that from the panels to processing, plasma screens are generally made entirely within each particular company, giving them total control over the quality of their products.

LCD TVs, on the other hand, are generally built by using a variety of third-party components, with all the quality assurance issues that entails. And even more confusingly, LCD TVs are traditionally ?OEM?d? ?some companies buy them from another manufacturer and simply put their own brand logo on them. So with LCD, the name on the front of the TV screen you buy may not necessarily be the name of the company that built the main part of the product.

MikeVega · 03-05-2007, 08:02 AM

Plasma TV vs. LCD

This is a complicated topic: when choosing between LCD and plasma TVs, you're actually selecting between two competing technologies, both of which achieve similar features (i.e., bright, crystal-clear images, super color-filled pictures) and come in similar packages (i.e., 3.5 inch depth flat screen casing). To complicate the decision-making process further, price and size are two previous considerations that are rapidly becoming non-issues as LCDs are now being made in larger sizes and at competing prices with plasma TVs.

Despite all these similarities, these technologies differ in how they process and display incoming video/computer signals.

Plasma flat screen technology consists hundreds of thousands of individual pixel cells, which allow electric pulses (stemming from electrodes) to excite rare natural gases-usually xenon and neon-causing them to glow and produce light. This light illuminates the proper balance of red, green, or blue phosphors contained in each cell to display the proper color sequence from the light. Each pixel cell is essentially an individual microscopic florescent light bulb, receiving instruction from software contained on the rear electrostatic silicon board. Look very closely at a plasma TV and you can actually see the individual pixel cell coloration of red, green, and blue bars. You can also see the black ribs which separate each.

Whether spread across a flat-panel screen or placed in the heart of a projector, all LCD displays come from the same technological background. A matrix of thin-film transistors (TFTs) supplies voltage to liquid-crystal-filled cells sandwiched between two sheets of glass. When hit with an electrical charge, the crystals untwist to an exact degree to filter white light generated by a lamp behind the screen (for flat-panel TVs) or one projecting through a small LCD chip (for projection TVs). LCD monitors reproduce colors through a process of subtraction: They block out particular color wavelengths from the spectrum of white light until they're left with just the right color. And, it's the intensity of light permitted to pass through this liquid-crystal matrix that enables LCD televisions to display images chock-full of colors-or gradations of them.

FROM THIS SITE ....GREAT READ

Sid70 · 03-05-2007, 08:03 AM

Jensen rocked! Thanks, man, from what I've seen myself I liked plasma better, considering lifespan, damn, they make better shit each year, lets not pretend we dont want a new laptop or tv that soon

Slick · 03-05-2007, 08:32 AM

I'm an LCD man myself

Big_Red · 03-05-2007, 08:34 AM

LCD or die.

UniversalPass Pete · 03-05-2007, 08:41 AM

Just my 2

here but to my understanding, Plasma puts out about as much or more radiation than a regular tube TV, LCDs put out very little if any.

Adultnet · 03-05-2007, 08:50 AM

go for the LCD ...

pornguy · 03-05-2007, 08:54 AM

Been looking at both myself.

Tom_PM · 03-05-2007, 08:59 AM

My new plasma (made in dec 2006) is beautiful. Way better quality, very impressive.

Also about radiation I found this:

Misconception #7: Plasma TVs give off a lot of radiation.
This rumor just might be the most outlandish of the bunch, especially considering the fact that the monitor you're reading this on -- assuming it is a CRT -- gives off considerably more radiation than a plasma display ever could. While plasma monitors do generate a tiny amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, it is essentially negligible because this radiation extends no more than an inch outward from the screen. Because individual pixels are illuminated, the radiation is "contained" to the pixels themselves. This is not the case with tube-based TVs, which utilize an electron gun that shoots radiated light toward the screen in order to illuminate phosphors thereon. This projects small amounts of radiation sometimes more than 12" outward from the screen. Not to worry: Both plasmas and CRTs comply with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for TV radiation emissions, which have been in place since 1969.

dready · 03-05-2007, 09:13 AM

They both suck compared to OLED, wait for it, or get something you don't mind tossing in the garbage in two years so you can replace it with something 1000% better.

Sid70 · 03-05-2007, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dready

They both suck compared to OLED, wait for it, or get something you don't mind tossing in the garbage in two years so you can replace it with something 1000% better.

it's $1300 here for 42" Plasma... thats not cheap US market..

Redmanthatcould · 03-05-2007, 09:23 AM

SED for the win, my friends.

Toshiba and Canon project scheduled to launch in Q1 of 2008 - save your money

http://gear.ign.com/articles/679/679235p1.html

mattz · 03-05-2007, 09:25 AM

Why don't you just use the search function...they're prolly 10 different threads like this with the exact same thing

HeadPimp · 03-05-2007, 10:23 AM

Go with a microdisplay rear projection.

notabook · 03-05-2007, 01:38 PM

LCD's with LED backlighting are equal, if not better, than their plasma equivalents. There is no purpose to get plasma anymore -- within a year SED TV's will be out and Plasma will be rather outdated.

NewbieNudes · 03-05-2007, 01:44 PM

LCD Hi Def 1920x1080.

Plasmas cant compete and I have seen so many plasmas go off-color after only 3 years or so.

Voodoo · 03-05-2007, 01:48 PM

The new plasmas don't have as many issues as the older models. Screen burn is one of the bigger issues related to having a plasma, however most of the newer TVs have a white wash to correct this issue. I recently picked up a 42" plasma, and it's been great so far. One of my main reasons for choosing plasma over LCD was that the LCD screens are soft, and during a move, I could see how it could easily get torn or cut against something. The plasma has a hard cover.

Just some thoughts.

pinkbits · 03-05-2007, 01:49 PM

you cant tell the diff just get a high res plasma they are coming off in price and they come in bigger sizes

Mish · 03-05-2007, 01:53 PM

We just got a 42" LCD and the HD channels are out of control on it! I love it.

Star 69 · 03-05-2007, 02:03 PM

LCD no doubt

lot · 03-05-2007, 02:11 PM

my voice's for LCD too

ungratefulninja · 03-05-2007, 03:27 PM

Have you looked at them yourself? What did you think?

I used to sell Plasma and LCD TVs years ago, but back then finding an LCD bigger than 30" was rare, so it was more of a size thing. First hand I saw a couple more problems with plasma.. but I think it was mainly because cheap plasmas had just started coming out.. the LCDs we sold were more quality brands. We never had any issues with Pioneer/Sony/Philips plasma TVs.

I ended up buying an LCD rear-projection (Sony Grand Wega.)

sharp · 03-05-2007, 04:08 PM

I have a 37" LCD and I love it.

Screaming · 03-05-2007, 04:15 PM

i was watchin football on my boys lcd and noticed whats called "ghosting"

never seen anything like that on my plasma

i love my plasma honestly

arial · 03-05-2007, 04:32 PM

I have a DLP myself but I would go with the LCD.

Barefootsies · 03-05-2007, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screaming

i was watchin football on my boys lcd and noticed whats called "ghosting"

never seen anything like that on my plasma

i love my plasma honestly

Plasma has my vote the that exact reason... ghosting...

Drives me nuts on LCD monitors as well.

MikeVega · 03-05-2007, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Plasma has my vote the that exact reason... ghosting...

Drives me nuts on LCD monitors as well.

I get Ghosting on both my 32" LCDs but not on either of my 42" Plasmas .. that's the biggest difference i notice between the 2 ..and the Plasma's do have a richer color .

MediumPimpin · 03-05-2007, 08:18 PM

Plasma all the way!

Cash · 03-06-2007, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VS_Jeff

SED for the win, my friends.

Toshiba and Canon project scheduled to launch in Q1 of 2008 - save your money

http://gear.ign.com/articles/679/679235p1.html

Looks like a winner ... you buy something now (with a long lifespan) just to fnd out that it may become obsolete in months ...

Gabriel Night · 03-06-2007, 12:25 AM

Plasma is the good stuff great colour and resolution but with the LCD hmm i like mutch becouse i like to work with them..

emthree · 03-06-2007, 12:28 AM

1080p Lcd Ftw

bigalownz · 03-06-2007, 03:20 AM

in the old days LCD where bad now there better than plasma

themonk · 03-06-2007, 03:24 AM

LCD...
i am waiting for laser desplays to come...

flashfire · 03-06-2007, 03:32 AM

lies lies lies! newer plasmas look far better

en21 · 03-06-2007, 05:00 AM

LCD... why?

lighter... better technology
last longer

03-05-2007, 07:30 AM	#1
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	LCD or Plasma? 37" 1300 res LCD or 42" 1024 res Plasma.... which one is better ?? __________________ Русня, идите нахуй!

03-05-2007, 07:42 AM	#2
hzoltan Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: 21sextury Cash HQ Posts: 2,007	LCD plasma is dead __________________ Gabriel - [email protected] - ICQ 636275551

03-05-2007, 07:45 AM	#3
kowalsky Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 2,494	Everyone says LCD is better, there are many reason for that, I don´t remember anyone. __________________ Jimmy Kowalsky www.catchycash.com [email protected] ICQ - 7319094

03-05-2007, 07:47 AM	#4
Elly Vaine Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe Posts: 371	I have Lcd as TV and Plasma on laptop. From what i know, most of people prefere Lcd instead of Plasma. I like my Lcd tv. Elly Jaine __________________ See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

03-05-2007, 07:47 AM	#5
FlowerKid Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Zurich Posts: 1,045	Go for a 50" plasma with a resolution of 1366x768. It's also perfect to connect a PC to it with a media center software. __________________

03-05-2007, 07:48 AM	#6
Violetta Affiliate Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 28,735	you cant tell the difference... __________________ M&A Queen

03-05-2007, 07:56 AM	#9
MikeVega Porntrepreneur Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: New York Posts: 12,788	i have 2 LCD tvs and 2 Plasma Tvs . the Plasma Tv has better color. __________________ Mike Vega-ICQ:253868499-AIM:mikeydicevega

03-05-2007, 07:58 AM	#10
Angelo22 Writer Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 3,123	Plasma have been proven to deterioriorate their quality in a short time... So i guess LCD __________________ MAKE MORE MONEY FROM YOUR WEB TRAFFIC - 15% BONUS And contact me if you need high quality translating and writing work done - angelo22 (AT) gmail (DOT) com

03-05-2007, 07:58 AM	#11
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	According to Synovate research participants: (UK, France and Germany) 65% favour Plasma over LCD for best Colour Quality 61% say Plasma delivers the best Sharpness Quality 62% indicate that Plasma has the best Response Time 72% deem Plasma to have the best Black Quality performance --- facts and myths: Response time (Motion) Myth Flat TVs have trouble retaining resolution when displaying fast moving images. Fact Plasma TVs can present moving objects without loss of crispness or detail.Plasma technology needs only one impulse per pixel to produce an image therefore its response time is almost instantaneous. LCD technology requires pixels to go from active ? to inactive -and back to active again, to achieve a single response cycle; their response time can measure anywhere between 4 milliseconds to and 25 milliseconds. Even the fastest LCD screens can suffer with some degree of movement blurring. Viewing angle Myth Flat TVs have poor viewing angles, meaning pictures lose much of their quality unless you?re sat directly in front of the screen. Fact Plasma TVs can actually be watched from very wide viewing angles without any significant loss in colour or contrast, thanks to the fact that they emit light directly from each of their screen cells or pixels. However, LCD pixels merely ?pass on? a light originating from a single point behind them, therefore LCD screens can lose contrast and colour if watched from angles as small as 45 degrees. Screen burn Myth Plasma TVs are seriously prone to burn in. Fact In the early days, plasma TVs were susceptible to screen burn. However, this issue has been largely eliminated thanks to greater use of built-in screen-saving systems and major phosphors improvements. Example You can now play computer games or watch logo-heavy channels (e.g. CNN) on a plasma TV without worrying about various static image elements being on the screen for a long period of time. Energy use Myth Plasma TVs use more power than their LCD rivals. Fact The reality is that plasma TVs don?t necessarily use any more power than LCDs ? a fact which makes perfect sense if you think about how each technology works. Plasma TVs, for instance, require just a single ignition of a plasma cell to cause a pixel to illuminate. Since darkness is achieved in plasma pixels by stopping electrical current getting into them, it follows that plasma TVs need relatively little power to reproduce dark scenes. LCDs by comparison run at a constant power regardless of whether a scene is dark or light, due to their use of an always-on backlight. Results from an independent research conducted by the AVT.O.P. Messetechnik laboratory in Germany, showed that plasmas tend to use the same ? and sometimes less ? amounts of power than LCD screens. Lifespan Myth Plasma screens have a shorter lifespan than LCD screens. Fact Plasma TVs actually have a lifespan that?s at least equal to that of LCD TVs. TVs using either technology will provide at least 60,000 hours of life under normal viewing conditions before they lose more than half their original brightness. This translates to 27 years of continuous viewing for six hours a day. Plasma screens can actually be made to last even longer depending on the picture settings you use. For instance, keeping the contrast low could potentially extend a plasma screen?s life. End to end production Myth Plasma and LCD TVs alike are built using bits and pieces sourced from a variety of different manufacturers. Fact Generally, Plasma TVs tend to be developed and built completely ?in-house?. In the early days of plasma TV, most manufacturers tended to develop their own plasma research and technology, leading to a situation where many companies now have plasma production as an integrated business model. This means that from the panels to processing, plasma screens are generally made entirely within each particular company, giving them total control over the quality of their products. LCD TVs, on the other hand, are generally built by using a variety of third-party components, with all the quality assurance issues that entails. And even more confusingly, LCD TVs are traditionally ?OEM?d? ?some companies buy them from another manufacturer and simply put their own brand logo on them. So with LCD, the name on the front of the TV screen you buy may not necessarily be the name of the company that built the main part of the product.

03-05-2007, 08:02 AM	#12
MikeVega Porntrepreneur Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: New York Posts: 12,788	Plasma TV vs. LCD This is a complicated topic: when choosing between LCD and plasma TVs, you're actually selecting between two competing technologies, both of which achieve similar features (i.e., bright, crystal-clear images, super color-filled pictures) and come in similar packages (i.e., 3.5 inch depth flat screen casing). To complicate the decision-making process further, price and size are two previous considerations that are rapidly becoming non-issues as LCDs are now being made in larger sizes and at competing prices with plasma TVs. Despite all these similarities, these technologies differ in how they process and display incoming video/computer signals. Plasma flat screen technology consists hundreds of thousands of individual pixel cells, which allow electric pulses (stemming from electrodes) to excite rare natural gases-usually xenon and neon-causing them to glow and produce light. This light illuminates the proper balance of red, green, or blue phosphors contained in each cell to display the proper color sequence from the light. Each pixel cell is essentially an individual microscopic florescent light bulb, receiving instruction from software contained on the rear electrostatic silicon board. Look very closely at a plasma TV and you can actually see the individual pixel cell coloration of red, green, and blue bars. You can also see the black ribs which separate each. Whether spread across a flat-panel screen or placed in the heart of a projector, all LCD displays come from the same technological background. A matrix of thin-film transistors (TFTs) supplies voltage to liquid-crystal-filled cells sandwiched between two sheets of glass. When hit with an electrical charge, the crystals untwist to an exact degree to filter white light generated by a lamp behind the screen (for flat-panel TVs) or one projecting through a small LCD chip (for projection TVs). LCD monitors reproduce colors through a process of subtraction: They block out particular color wavelengths from the spectrum of white light until they're left with just the right color. And, it's the intensity of light permitted to pass through this liquid-crystal matrix that enables LCD televisions to display images chock-full of colors-or gradations of them. FROM THIS SITE ....GREAT READ __________________ Mike Vega-ICQ:253868499-AIM:mikeydicevega

03-05-2007, 08:03 AM	#13
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	Jensen rocked! Thanks, man, from what I've seen myself I liked plasma better, considering lifespan, damn, they make better shit each year, lets not pretend we dont want a new laptop or tv that soon __________________ Русня, идите нахуй! Last edited by Sid70; 03-05-2007 at 08:05 AM..

03-05-2007, 08:32 AM	#14
Slick Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Houghton, MI Posts: 7,338	I'm an LCD man myself

03-05-2007, 08:34 AM	#15
Big_Red Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Do you care? Posts: 4,147	LCD or die. __________________ 60% Revshare. http://www.boobycash.com We got the boobs and the cash! ICQ 198-580-197 24/7 support

03-05-2007, 08:41 AM	#16
UniversalPass Pete Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA http://www.universalpass.com Posts: 7,368	Just my 2 here but to my understanding, Plasma puts out about as much or more radiation than a regular tube TV, LCDs put out very little if any. __________________ V4.0 It's Here! NOT JUST AVS ANYMORE! Teen Whore Fetish All Milf Sluts Real Asian Cunts All Latina Cunts Massive XXX Boobs All Out Anal Since 1997. ICQ: 107746038

03-05-2007, 08:50 AM	#17
Adultnet Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 8,713	go for the LCD ... __________________ TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996! Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!

03-05-2007, 08:54 AM	#18
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Been looking at both myself. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-05-2007, 08:59 AM	#19
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	My new plasma (made in dec 2006) is beautiful. Way better quality, very impressive. Also about radiation I found this: Misconception #7: Plasma TVs give off a lot of radiation. This rumor just might be the most outlandish of the bunch, especially considering the fact that the monitor you're reading this on -- assuming it is a CRT -- gives off considerably more radiation than a plasma display ever could. While plasma monitors do generate a tiny amount of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, it is essentially negligible because this radiation extends no more than an inch outward from the screen. Because individual pixels are illuminated, the radiation is "contained" to the pixels themselves. This is not the case with tube-based TVs, which utilize an electron gun that shoots radiated light toward the screen in order to illuminate phosphors thereon. This projects small amounts of radiation sometimes more than 12" outward from the screen. Not to worry: Both plasmas and CRTs comply with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for TV radiation emissions, which have been in place since 1969. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

03-05-2007, 09:13 AM	#20
dready Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 5,247	They both suck compared to OLED, wait for it, or get something you don't mind tossing in the garbage in two years so you can replace it with something 1000% better. __________________ ICQ: 91139591

03-05-2007, 09:23 AM	#22
Redmanthatcould Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,771	SED for the win, my friends. Toshiba and Canon project scheduled to launch in Q1 of 2008 - save your money http://gear.ign.com/articles/679/679235p1.html

03-05-2007, 09:25 AM	#23
mattz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: AZ Posts: 7,697	Why don't you just use the search function...they're prolly 10 different threads like this with the exact same thing

03-05-2007, 10:23 AM	#24
HeadPimp Bad Mo-Fo Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 2,772	Go with a microdisplay rear projection.

03-05-2007, 01:38 PM	#25
notabook Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Not a Library! Posts: 9,748	LCD's with LED backlighting are equal, if not better, than their plasma equivalents. There is no purpose to get plasma anymore -- within a year SED TV's will be out and Plasma will be rather outdated. __________________

03-05-2007, 01:44 PM	#26
NewbieNudes Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 939	LCD Hi Def 1920x1080. Plasmas cant compete and I have seen so many plasmas go off-color after only 3 years or so. __________________ \| Click Here to join our unique high converting program \| Add yourself for free traffic! ICQ: 279 738 569 \| Skype: NewbieNudes \| Email: affiliates at newbienudes dot com

03-05-2007, 01:48 PM	#27
Voodoo ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 10,592	The new plasmas don't have as many issues as the older models. Screen burn is one of the bigger issues related to having a plasma, however most of the newer TVs have a white wash to correct this issue. I recently picked up a 42" plasma, and it's been great so far. One of my main reasons for choosing plasma over LCD was that the LCD screens are soft, and during a move, I could see how it could easily get torn or cut against something. The plasma has a hard cover. Just some thoughts.

03-05-2007, 01:49 PM	#28
pinkbits Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Every where at the moment. Posts: 367	you cant tell the diff just get a high res plasma they are coming off in price and they come in bigger sizes

03-05-2007, 01:53 PM	#29
Mish Registered User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Philadelphia Posts: 49	We just got a 42" LCD and the HD channels are out of control on it! I love it. __________________ Why Aren't You Making Money with Phone Sex?

03-05-2007, 02:03 PM	#30
Star 69 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Russia Posts: 8,602	LCD no doubt __________________ e-mail star69

03-05-2007, 02:11 PM	#31
lot Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: sheanimale.com Posts: 925	my voice's for LCD too __________________ ExoticGold - 100% Original Transexual Affiliate Program, So Hot, Straight Men Get Sprung!

03-05-2007, 03:27 PM	#32
ungratefulninja Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 682	Have you looked at them yourself? What did you think? I used to sell Plasma and LCD TVs years ago, but back then finding an LCD bigger than 30" was rare, so it was more of a size thing. First hand I saw a couple more problems with plasma.. but I think it was mainly because cheap plasmas had just started coming out.. the LCDs we sold were more quality brands. We never had any issues with Pioneer/Sony/Philips plasma TVs. I ended up buying an LCD rear-projection (Sony Grand Wega.)

03-05-2007, 04:08 PM	#33
sharp Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 7,006	I have a 37" LCD and I love it.

03-05-2007, 04:15 PM	#34
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	i was watchin football on my boys lcd and noticed whats called "ghosting" never seen anything like that on my plasma i love my plasma honestly __________________

03-05-2007, 04:32 PM	#35
arial Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Bay Area Posts: 4,012	I have a DLP myself but I would go with the LCD.

03-05-2007, 08:18 PM	#38
MediumPimpin Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,488	Plasma all the way! __________________ nats.mediumpimpin.com

03-06-2007, 12:25 AM	#40
Gabriel Night Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 602	Plasma is the good stuff great colour and resolution but with the LCD hmm i like mutch becouse i like to work with them..

03-06-2007, 12:28 AM	#41
emthree Dialer Kingpin Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York Posts: 10,816	1080p Lcd Ftw __________________ • Sell Patches & Pills •