Can You Solve This Mystery?

[DOCTOR 30]

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Okay, here's one for you big brain Brad's out there.

It's about a map, drawn up 300 years ago that shows
the outline of Antarctica.

Problem is how did someone 300 years ago know exactly
what the coastline of Antarctica looked like without the ice
on it when science says ice has been covering it for millions
of years?

Even naval analysis concluded as well as recent satellite
subsurface imaging that the map is accurate.

Any guesses?

[nosey]

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by DOCTOR 30

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Okay, here's one for you big brain Brad's out there.

It's about a map, drawn up 300 years ago that shows
the outline of Antarctica.

Problem is how did someone 300 years ago know exactly
what the coastline of Antarctica looked like without the ice
on it when science says ice has been covering it for millions
of years?

Even naval analysis concluded as well as recent satellite
subsurface imaging that the map is accurate.

Any guesses?

Shhhh if that melts New York City will be underwater... shhh

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by DOCTOR 30

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Okay, here's one for you big brain Brad's out there.

It's about a map, drawn up 300 years ago that shows
the outline of Antarctica.

Problem is how did someone 300 years ago know exactly
what the coastline of Antarctica looked like without the ice
on it when science says ice has been covering it for millions
of years?

Even naval analysis concluded as well as recent satellite
subsurface imaging that the map is accurate.

Any guesses?

i remember reading about this awhile ago.
cant remember the story the writer was trying to tell.

but i am guessing the map was compiled off of many older maps...there could have been some drawings of the coastline...discovered means it was put in history books is all

[Jayvis]

He probably Google'd it.

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i remember reading about this awhile ago.
cant remember the story the writer was trying to tell.

but i am guessing the map was compiled off of many older maps...there could have been some drawings of the coastline...discovered means it was put in history books is all

ahh millions of years old maps they found...

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

ahh millions of years old maps they found...

what are you retarded?

in your bible tumping world hasnt the earth only been around for a few thousand years?


anyway jackass....why dont you explain it...mister fuckin wizard

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

what are you retarded?

in your bible tumping world hasnt the earth only been around for a few thousand years?


anyway jackass....why dont you explain it...mister fuckin wizard

Well lets see 1500's were hotter than now, the ice umm was umm melted? lol

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Well lets see 1500's were hotter than now, the ice umm was umm melted? lol

reading comprehension wasnt your strong suit eh..i am deducing that by observing you ignore information and jump straight to your biblle thumper conclusions.


if it hadn't been discovered yet..your explanation of less ice..doesnt hold much water now does it?

[stickyfingerz]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

reading comprehension wasnt your strong suit eh..i am deducing that by observing you ignore information and jump straight to your biblle thumper conclusions.


if it hadn't been discovered yet..your explanation of less ice..doesnt hold much water now does it?

Wasnt discovered yet, but yet..... they had detailed maps..... hmmmm

[SmokeyTheBear]

its south america..

it says the area is hot and filled with snaked, that doesn't sound like antractica , and the map shows the falkland islands.

[BoyAlley]

Originally Posted by nosey

[stickyfingerz]

Maybe her network was around even back then..

[RedShoe]

Originally Posted by DOCTOR 30

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm

Okay, here's one for you big brain Brad's out there.

It's about a map, drawn up 300 years ago that shows
the outline of Antarctica.

Problem is how did someone 300 years ago know exactly
what the coastline of Antarctica looked like without the ice
on it when science says ice has been covering it for millions
of years?

Even naval analysis concluded as well as recent satellite
subsurface imaging that the map is accurate.

Any guesses?

Prove the "WEBSITE" you got that from really has a document that old. If it's on the internet it MUST be true.



HAHAHAHA, just busting balls. The truth is, that document was drawn by my father as a joke.

[Dynamix]

6, July, 1960
Subject: Admiral Piri Reis Map
TO: Prof. Charles H. Hapgood
Keene College
Keene, New Hampshire


Dear Professor Hapgood,
Your request of evaluation of certain unusual features of the Piri Reis map of 1513 by this organization has been reviewed.
The claim that the lower part of the map portrays the Princess Martha Coast of Queen Maud Land, Antarctic, and the Palmer Peninsular, is reasonable. We find that this is the most logical and in all probability the correct interpretation of the map.
The geographical detail shown in the lower part of the map agrees very remarkably with the results of the seismic profile made across the top of the ice-cap by the Swedish-British Antarctic Expedition of 1949.
This indicates the coastline had been mapped before it was covered by the ice-cap.
The ice-cap in this region is now about a mile thick.
We have no idea how the data on this map can be reconciled with the supposed state of geographical knowledge in 1513.

Harold Z. Ohlmeyer Lt. Colonel, USAF Commander

Maybe I'm out of the ballpark here but wouldn't a Lt Colonel of the US Air Force have better grammar and vocabulary skills than what appears in the "response" ? In particular Your request of ought to be Your request for.. seems fishy to me.

[bobby666]

iv read about the piri rice caed in erich van deniken books

[notabook]

Originally Posted by bobby666

iv read about the piri rice caed in erich van deniken books

You're dead to me now.