now you can sell them to them....

Congrats Kenny B! nice to see you didn't just roll over.. I'm not a sue happy person, but I'd counter sue them for your time and expenses.


Dude what a ass hat that guy is.. Companies with that kind of attitude should be black balled out of adult.

This is definitely a good thing :)

Congrats mate

Kenny Congrats ;)

But seriously, when you get a trade mark you have to protect it - or at least try to. I doubt you would have done any different if roles were reveresed. Anyway. At least the domain get's to stick with it's biological parent and stuff. So cheers.

congrads kenny and all the best.
good to hear you stock it to them hard in between the ass with no lub.
i know you and i know your business style and just knowing that i know you were on the right side of this dispute.
those guys should have known better then to mess around with a fellow a fellow Ashkenazi.
just to rub it in KAP face i checked and the following is available in case anyone else is interested in registering any of these domain names

KICKASSPORNONLINE.COM
KICKASSPORNHOME.COM
KICKASSPORNWEB.COM
KICKASSPORNLIVE.COM
BESTKICKASSPORN.COM
NEWKICKASSPORN.COM
MYKICKASSPORN.COM
THEKICKASSPORN.COM
OFFICIALKICKASSPORN.COM
KICKASSPICTURESONLINE.COM
KICKASSPICTURESHOME.COM
KICKASSPICTURESSITE.COM
KICKASSPICTURESWEB.COM
KICKASSPICTURESLIVE.COM
KICKASSPICTURESBLOG.COM
BESTKICKASSPICTURES.COM
NEWKICKASSPICTURES.COM
MYKICKASSPICTURES.COM
THEKICKASSPICTURES.COM
OFFICIALKICKASSPICTURES.COM
KICKASSPICTURES.MOBI Just $14.99*/yr
KICKASSPICTURES.TV Just $34.99/yr
KICKASSPICTURES.WS Just $9.99/yr

Oh in case anyone wants to tell KAP to go fuck off directly, you can do so by emailing them at [email protected] or [email protected]
KAP as Colombo would say "JUST ONE MORE THING" :321GFY

Seriously dude, it would be one thing if you trade marked a unique term or something that was yours specifically.. But when you try and steal peoples sites because they use very common words that are close to your trade mark.. Well then IMO you suck.

You can play nice on the boards but It's not like you had a brand name like Twistys, Girls Gone Wild, Ford or Chevy.. Terms like those are uniquely branded and everyone knows who they are because they made that term popular or famous.

Trying to steal a name that is so common as "Kick Ass" makes you look like a dumb ass. Companies like yours piss me off royally and I'm glad for once the little guy won.

Usually the hardest item to prove in a UDRP is this: "Domain was registered AND is being used in bad faith." [emphasis added by Your Daddy]

If they acquired their "trademark" after your domain was registered, it is nearly impossible to prove that necessary element.

Real pros sue in federal court.

N00bs file UDRPs.

Thanks Vic:winkwink:

I would have done differently if the roles were reversed because I would have known that the domains weren?t infringing on the trademark. But that?s just me. For future refrence Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be cancelled or transferred:

(1) the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(3) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

Honestly your company should re-think your legal counsel. You spent a lot of money to file this claim and your lawyer should have advised you differently from the start. He had his best interests at heart, not yours.

I thank Kenny for bringing me out of my shell and getting me to finally register on GFY and JBM. It pains me to read all these negative comments, because anyone who knows me or my company knows that I?m a good guy who goes out of my way to do the right thing. Here?s a brief history of what happened from my side.

I already knew AJ, who originally owned the two kickass domain names in question and continued to run them. Apparently at some point he turned ownership of them over to Kenny in Canada because of 2257 considerations. I didn?t want to own sites, but my attorney said that if I knowingly allowed a ?Kick Ass? site to operate, it could harm my federal trademark. (As anyone who owns a trademark knows, you have to defend that trademark against infringement or it becomes worthless.)

So I entered into negotiations with AJ, trying to cut a deal in which he still ran the sites and made as much money as always, but they at least promoted some Kick Ass products. The deal never materialized, due to 2257 legal considerations that I won?t bore anyone with. At the end of those months, AJ and I shook hands as friends. I told him that it was nothing personal, but my attorney had advised me that I had to defend my trademark, so I was obligated to bring the matter to ICANN.

In my eyes, this has been a win-win situation, because I have a record of defending my trademark, and Kenny got to keep the sites. Yes I could have purchased the domains, but the asking price was about 10 times what it cost me to file with ICANN, and as I said before, I never had a desire to own those domains.

For the record, I have only resorted to ICANN once before, to get the domain name barefootconfidential.com. In that case, I believe the name was registered in bad faith because my trademarked Barefoot Confidential video series had been around for years and had won numerous AVN Awards, and someone else was profiting from that. (And let?s face it, Barefoot Confidential is not a ?generic? term like kick ass, which is why I won that case and lost this one.)

Anyway, I felt I had to explain my side of the story. I?m going to be at the Phoenix Forum next month, and I invite anyone who still thinks I?m a big, bad, litigious ogre to say hi and decide for yourself. And Kenny, if I see you there, I?ll buy you a drink to show there are no hard feelings.

Mark Kulkis
President, Kick Ass Pictures

Nicely said, Mark :thumbsup :thumbsup

Jonathan

uh oh let's see how this turns out

I think your lawyer was wrong because generally "The failure to persue a particular case dose not prevent the persuit of a future case".

If it did then I could commit a shitload of crimes then claim the DA can't persue my case since there are many similar cases the DA didn't persue.

In other words :"The other guy who was speeding didn't get stopped" is not an excuse.

yep, Vic Kick Ass is my personal good friend and a legend in the music scene. He played in the biggest hardcore band of all time with Zac De La Rocha from Rage Against the Machine.

here's a pic of Vic and Zac rocking out!http://myspace-526.vo.llnwd.net/0039...94103526_l.jpg

Not to turn this thread into a thread about Vic Kick Ass but check him rock the axe here,LOL. very metal!http://www.weare108.com/photos/arnhe...10-06/06_b.jpg

Hey Mark, welcome to GFY and don't mind the negative comments... most are made by people who never had to defend a trademark. Kenny is a good guy and someone I would recommend to anyone in this biz. Hope you guys can work it out now so that it is a win-win and you both can step to making cash together.

Your friend and former nemesis, the guy with the Dr. Seuss sounding name...:winkwink: :winkwink:

grats on your victory

I think yuze all need to chill out. first of all it has nothing to do with you. Second of all, it's not saytanic. it's business. get a grip not a gripe. stop crying, get back to business.

I appreciate your level response. I would prefer to speak to you directly rather than over this board.

1) Vic is kickass.

2) KickAss Pictures did everything by the book in this situation. No malice. No ill will.

3) If you want to look at an example of an UNcool way to defend your mark, check out Suicide Girls and their legal attacks of any photographer or model who strays.

just for the record and not to take a side here either way...

We have had to defend ourselves in similar circumstances several times over the last few years. We have always won. I have not looked at the Kick Ass trademarks but I am surprised that they did not prevail.

I agree with Kenny that Mark should probably be looking for a better attorney for these type of issues... but not because I don't think they had an argument for tm protection. On the contrary, I am surprised that Kick Ass Pictures did not prevail here.

So in other words a guy that likes to "do the right thing" and is a stand up guy, felt because it was much cheaper to try and steal the domain than buy it. So instead of doing the right thing and buying the domain at a fair market price you decided it was cheaper to try and steal someone else's hard work and livelihood.

I have no stakes at all in this nor do I know either party involved but I can't stand when companies or people try to pull this kind of shit.

So I wonder have you filled suite against all these people? http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...J:en&q=kickass

I had the pleasure of meeting both Mark and Vic from Kick Ass 2 weeks ago at the Xbiz show, and these guys are straight up people!!

Im glad to see this thing turn out ok for both sides..

congrats!

:D

That was proper - Good meeting you at Xbiz to :thumbsup

Nice post Mark.
That's more or less the chain of events.

Not sure it's a win-win just yet, Vic still owes me . . . He said I have "a coupon for pepto and drinks from Kick Ass."

why are you trying to turn this into something that it is not? There is no "stealing" going on here. Read the thread and you would realize neither side is "right" or "wrong"... this is just biz and the only thing that can be judged is whether each side of the equation handled the situation with professionalism - which is entirely apparent that they did.

See it from both sides. Do you have any idea how much Kick Ass Pictures spent developing their tradename and marks? And do you know what an obligation protecting those can be?

kickasspornstars is HAWT