if reading a fact about our industry makes you wanna vomit, I would imagine this would make you poop your pants
http://www3.littleapril.com/67548195/tour.html

is this idiot banned yet ?

My ruling on this...

I see possibly under aged pics of fully clothed teenagers. But in many of them they appear to be in college dorms so guessing the ages of fully clothed girls is a waste of time.

As for the paysite. Their 2257 page is not in the proper format and does not have the proper data in it. Also many pages on the website do not have 2257 notices but do have pornography on them. That is not good.

Well one thing is for sure, a lot of the pics in question on those galleries are "not" sponsor provided or "bought" content from a content provider. Looks like he has been grabbing pics off user groups or where ever else he can find them on the net and using them for this site.

While it's hard to tell if any are underage, I'd have to question a few myself and I'd bet they likely are. The one's in question IMO don't contain nudity but still I think using them on an adult site could be breaking some sort of law, specially because a few are posing in sexually provocative poses.

btw in case you can't figure it out, the missing word in the url is "and"

Hmm.. that chick in the sweatshirt is wearing a high school cheerleaders sweatshirt...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

this is what I get for going outside:Oh crap

Looks like those sites are using your nameservers. :2 cents: :2 cents:

I know plenty of 18 year olds in high school.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Don't blame Squishy - blame his parents for not choking him to death the day he was born...

seriously whats up with Franck?

did he stop posting on purpose cause he's addicted or what?

A Thai whore said I ilook 16 years old yet she still wanted to fuck me, does that make her bad? I'm well over 20 btw

....oh, and I once banged a girl who looked 17, her drivers license said she is 22yrs old, am I a bad person?

yes you are bad cause you fuck Thai whores, ask Rhesus

Even I don't make threads as dumb as this.

OMFG thats priceless

Only on GFY

Nope, not true, i USED to fuck Thai whores, but I do NOT anymore :thumbsup

And news from admins about this thread?

1. didn't see any underage stuff there.
2. 2257 means shit when you're in the EU. It would even be illegal here to give out that info.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

looks older to me.

let's hope so :)

ALso franck should be banned for encouraging underage drinking. SHame on you franck. how could you make them do this:!?!

http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics.../993829601.jpg

hmm, does the one in the middle have a moustache? :Oh crap

I"ve been looking for evidence of CP on that site for about 30 mins now. There's none at all. There's maybe a couple of pics of underage girls, but who the fuck knows, these days? If there was going to be CP itd be fucking obvious. not 'oh she looks 16 to me' shit like all the jerks in here are going on about.

And I just HAD to share this.

http://www.amateurandvoyeur.com/pics...1111708149.jpg

what a bs thread

R

owned worse than paris hilton on every internet site

I don't see any proof in this thread.

Shouldn't squishpimp be banned for starting shit like this?

the pages are gone, but dont go accusing people of cp, without evidence. My neighbor is 19, and she looks like she is 15. I actually asked her to see her ID before even letting her into my house to play with my baby (I dont need kids poking around my house, and may be finding porn in my computer while I go to the bathroom).

Intresting,still no new post from squishpimp neither reply from Franck.

I got nothing to say besides that Squishy is a total idiot and that i ofcourse dont have anything to do with CP. And if he isnt banned already he should be for claiming i am without evidence.

Someone'll catch you some day.

Franck da Fag,

i thought he only promoted gay porn?

If you use this to guarantee it, then you have issues.
Coming from a mother of a 12 year old and a 15 year old, you couldn't be further from the truth.

HOLY FUCKIN SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:love-boob :love-boob :bowdown :bowdown :jerkoff :jerkoff

she looks 13, 14 tops! :winkwink:

I can see two potential problems here-

1. Copyright violation. The copyright most likely rests with the person holding the camera, unless they have signed a form saying they assign or relinquish copyright.

2. Use of a likeness without a release. The person(s) featured in the photos ARE identifiable (eventually) and their image is being used for commercial gain.