![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
New detailed article on .XXX
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=7144
full article below: Quote:
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
"Only members of the adult entertainment community can register .xxx names "
"We have a special subset of names, non-resolving names that will never point to content on .xxx," Lawley says. "For argument's sake, if a company like Revlon wants to reserve Revlon.xxx, there's a mechanism to do that at a low cost. We're proposing a 10-year parking program. The cost has yet to be decided." "Lawley says that the ICM Registry has registered a few thousand corporate and brand names that want to participate in the 10-year parking program." ------------------------------------------- wha? looks like line 1 is contradicted by line 2 since Revlon is clearly not in the adult community. Fight the Kerry!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
I guess they would be simply offering all mainstream companies an opportunity to register .xxx so that noone else does it.
They would have probably thousands of companies doing it, so its a pretty clever businessplan, although completely cynical and money driven.... doesn't have much to do with preventing children from stumnling upon porn... another interesting thing in this article is the prediction that .xxx would be quite likely made in fact mandatory after a few years
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
bump for those who missed it and are interested in this subject
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: My High Horse
Posts: 6,334
|
I told yall that this voluntary nonsense is bullshit the very next thing that coocksucker lawley will do is push for legislation forcing us to .xxx and will that stop google or filesharing onto dot XXX ...not in this lifetime
You are being led to slaughter like sheep... Although the proposed .xxx domain is voluntary, Fausett predicts that government agencies eventually will pass regulations that require porn sites to use special domains such as .xxx. He expects governments to zone online porn the same way they zone other adult entertainment businesses to keep offensive material away from minors. "At launch, .xxx is not going to be a very efficient way to police content. But three years from launch, I think it will be a very valuable tool for filtering content," Fausett says. "It's going to take a long time and some national laws will have to be put into place, which we will see."
__________________
Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: az
Posts: 8,464
|
Whoa nice.
The .xxx top-level domain would create a dedicated area of the Internet for sexually explicit material. The .xxx domain would be voluntary, meaning that existing pornographic Web sites in .com or other domains wouldn't be required to switch to the .xxx domain. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 2,624
|
So if someone owns the .com name do they get first dibs at the same .xxx domain? Or are these "pre-registering" people just gonna scoop them all up? If this is the case it's truly fucked up.
__________________
"There is no other way to see a thing except to look at it" - fatfoo |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,191
|
Quote:
What if people will associate porn with ONLY .xxx? I'm thinking of the next generation, mainly... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
..........
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,917
|
"`We've received more than twice our original forecast in pre-registrations since last May," Lawley says. "This leads us to believe that we will have at least 45 or so names registered when we go live."
so he anticipated to sell 5 and they sold 10 ![]() hahahahahaha sorry had to take a shot at the fucker. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,873
|
.xxx is run by a bunch of wankers
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
"Only members of the adult entertainment community can register .xxx names that resolve to Web content. ICM says it has put in place several mechanisms to protect company and brand names from misuse including the availability of 10-year contracts for names that won't resolve in .xxx. I would have expected you to be more diligent in reading things like this. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |