GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Here's a braintease I made up (Math Question)

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Here's a braintease I made up (Math Question) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=695473)

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 11726786)

pretty close you forgot to take the combinations into account

its 8!/2! *(.2^2)*(.8^6)

sorry typed it to fast

should have been 8!/6!/2!*.2^2*.8^6

or 4 *7= 28 times your number

1.6 now give the answere damn it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeana (Post 11726707)

It's a pretty simple question. There are 28 ways in which you can score exactly 2 goals. Each way has a probabilty of .0105

So the probabilty of scoring exactly 2 goals is .2936 or 29.36%

this is the right answer

Can I use a lifeline? :helpme

The answer to your orginal question is

Odds = 28/256 or 10.9%

The answer to the five sided coin is

Odds = 114688/390625 or 29.4% rounded

To show how I got the answer I will a simple example to prove the math

* A guy jumps out of a car, he will either land on his Head, Ass or feet.
What are the odds he will land on his Head exactly 2 times if he jumps
3 times.

The odds are calculated by determining all possibilties of his landings
over three jumps.

So he could land:
head, ass, feet (012) or
head, head, ass (001) or
ass, feet , head (120) etc.....

A total of 27 possiblities

But we are only interested about him landing on heads twice which means
these possible sets:

head,head,ass
head,head,feet
head,ass,head,
head,feet,head
ass,head,head
feet,head,head

A total of 6 relevent sets

No other sets satisifies our criteria.

Now run this simple perl script to prove my math

PERL cgi
------------

#!/usr/bin/perl
print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";

### copy right, 2007 interracialtoons.com

$head_ass_feet = "012"; ##### possible landings; head=0 ass=1 feet=2

@one = split(//, $head_ass_feet); #### array @one @two...etc are trys in the set of attempts
@two = @one;
@three = @one;

$total_permutes = 0; #### the total possible out comes of all trys in attempts
$heads2times = 0;

$a = 0;
foreach (@one) {
$b=0;
foreach(@two) {
$c = 0;
foreach (@three) {
$countheads = 0;

if ($one[$a] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($two[$b] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($three[$c] == 0) {$countheads++;}

print "$one[$a]$two[$b]$three[$c] "; #### Dont print for 8 shots! Too many!

if ($countheads == 2) {$heads2times++;} #### head must occur EXACTLY 2 times

if (-e "killthisshit.txt") {print "ABORTED"; exit;}
$total_permutes++;

$c++;}
$b++;}

$a++;}

print "Total Permutations = $total_permutes ";
print "Heads occured exactly 2 times = $heads2times ";
print "Odds = $heads2times/$total_permutes ";

exit;

---END PERL---

RESULT ------

All The possible results of 3 trys

000
001
002
010
011
012
020
021
022
100
101
102
110
111
112
120
121
122
200
201
202
210
211
212
220
221
222
Total Permutations = 27

Heads occured exactly 2 times = 6

Odds = 6/27

Only one of the above permutations will happen in 3 trys

The odds reduce to 2/9 or 1 in 4.5 = 22% rounded

NOW run this program which has the exact same math but uses the
five sided coin in your example with sides = head, arm1, arm2, leg1, leg2

#!/usr/bin/perl
print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";

$head_arm1_arm2_leg1_leg2 = "01245"; ##### possible landings; head=0 arm1=1 arm2=2 ...

@one = split(//, $head_arm1_arm2_leg1_leg2); #### array @one @two...etc are trys in the set of attempts
@two = @one;
@three = @one;
@four = @one;
@five = @one;
@six = @one;
@seven = @one;
@eight = @one;

$total_permutes = 0; #### the total possible out comes of all trys in attempts
$heads2times = 0;

$a = 0;
foreach (@one) {
$b=0;
foreach(@two) {
$c = 0;
foreach (@three) {
$d = 0;
foreach (@four) {
$e = 0;
foreach (@five) {
$f = 0;
foreach (@six) {
$g = 0;
foreach (@seven) {
$h = 0;
foreach (@eight) {

$countheads = 0;

if ($one[$a] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($two[$b] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($three[$c] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($four[$d] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($five[$e] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($six[$f] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($seven[$g] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($eight[$h] == 0) {$countheads++;}

#####print "$one[$a]$two[$b]$three[$c] "; #### Dont print for 8 shots! Too many!

if ($countheads == 2) {$heads2times++;} #### head must occur EXACTLY 2 times

if (-e "killthisshit.txt") {print "ABORTED"; exit;}
$total_permutes++;

$h++;}
$g++;}
$f++;}

$e++;}

$d++;}

$c++;}
$b++;}

$a++;}

print "Total Permutations = $total_permutes ";
print "Heads occured exactly 2 times = $heads2times ";
print "Odds = $heads2times/$total_permutes ";

exit;

---END PERL---

Now run the script for your orginal question

#!/usr/bin/perl
print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";

$hit_miss = "01"; ##### possible landings; hit=0 miss=1

@one = split(//, $hit_miss); #### array @one @two...etc are trys in the set of attempts
@two = @one;
@three = @one;
@four = @one;
@five = @one;
@six = @one;
@seven = @one;
@eight = @one;

$total_permutes = 0; #### the total possible out comes of all trys in attempts
$heads2times = 0;

$a = 0;
foreach (@one) {
$b=0;
foreach(@two) {
$c = 0;
foreach (@three) {
$d = 0;
foreach (@four) {
$e = 0;
foreach (@five) {
$f = 0;
foreach (@six) {
$g = 0;
foreach (@seven) {
$h = 0;
foreach (@eight) {

$countheads = 0;

if ($one[$a] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($two[$b] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($three[$c] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($four[$d] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($five[$e] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($six[$f] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($seven[$g] == 0) {$countheads++;}
if ($eight[$h] == 0) {$countheads++;}

#####print "$one[$a]$two[$b]$three[$c] "; #### Dont print for 8 shots! Too many!

if ($countheads == 2) {$heads2times++;} #### head must occur EXACTLY 2 times

if (-e "killthisshit.txt") {print "ABORTED"; exit;}
$total_permutes++;

$h++;}
$g++;}
$f++;}

$e++;}

$d++;}

$c++;}
$b++;}

$a++;}

print "Total Permutations = $total_permutes ";
print "Heads occured exactly 2 times = $heads2times ";
print "Odds = $heads2times/$total_permutes ";

exit;

----END PERL----

That's the real math!

BUT Wait.

Lets make his shooting stick to 20%

meaning $hit_miss = "01111"; ##### possible landings for this 20% user is 1 in five hit=0 miss=1

The question here though is "is this valid" to respresent his shooting as such

Now run the last script with the new hit miss value.

The result is the same as the five sided coin.

Conclusion:

I can flip your five sided coin 1000 times a day for 30 days
and get a different heads percentage every day!
I can factor these together and get my total heads percentage for those
days and it could be 50%(or 20% shooting from that spot) or any number but when I do it on the 31st day
the math will still be the same as every other day reguarless of the
percentage I compiled previously.

Therefore the mathematical odds never change bases on my previous success rate of flipping
and getting heads.

Just because you can factor some numbers and get a result does not mean the
result is meaningfull.

So. The orignal question has no "meaningfull results".

BUT if the shooter had attempted 8 shots a day for 30 days and he got exactly 2 hits
on 10 days then that would yield a 30% chance he would do it today but that has nothing to do with his
overall percentage of 20%. You didn't provide the needed information to actually find
a meaningfull result.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick3131 (Post 11726884)

this is the right answer

so what are the odds of scoring 2 goals in a row?... :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick3131 (Post 11726884)

this is the right answer

That is a an answer with intelligence but it is not the true way to find what you are looking for.

That's the odds that "the event" would occur not the odds that the paticular shooter would achieve "the event".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fris (Post 11725834)

interracialtoons has no traffic.

I figure, But the afro got me thinking and all giddy

take this shit to a math forum nick! lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej (Post 11727085)

I figure, But the afro got me thinking and all giddy

I do have interracial traffic to trade but not from that site.

That is a paysite and all the affiliate traffic goes to indexc.html and indexv.html, respresenting Ccbill and Verotel affiliates.

You should not take advise from people on this board as gospel, most don't have a clue about what others are doing.

Nick, sorry, but you need to go back and take a basic stats course to understand what you are getting into. 20% doesn't mean that every fifth ball goes in, but that over a sample range 20% of the balls went in. This is no way to accurately predict the percentage of sequential goals with the data you present.

Now, assumimg that the current shot was a goal, the chance that the next shot is also a goal is 20% - because the odds of the shot going in don't change because of the previous goal. So you are at 20%. Now, there is a 20% chance that the one after it is a goal as well, so the number straight lined is about 16%... but that is a very straight line interpretation of the math.

So, sorry, you won't make it as a math or stats major.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 11727257)

Yeah, if he provided a shot history then a decent value could be found.

For example, these two shooters both with 20% overall.
Each hit 16 out of 80 shoots

Where "1" equals a hit.

shooter a -

11000010
00000000
10000000
00100000
01010100
00011100
01000000
00000111
10000000
00000000

Shooter b -

11000000
00000101
00110000
10000001
00000000
00000000
01001000
10000010
00100100
00000011

It's clear that shooter "b" has an 80% odds of hitting exactly 2 shots out of
eight while shooter "a" has about 0% odds.

BUTTTTTT!! They both shot 20% overall.

He won't accept that though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 11727257)

I understand your point of view completely.

But to me, its simpler then that. You use the information that you are given. If he is shooting 20%, then odds say every shot he takes has a 20% chance of making it.

If I ask you if there is 2, 2 gallon containers full of water, how much water could you pour from them. Someone can say "well what if the water is frozen". To me you're doing the same thing. "What if he made 20 and missed 80".

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick3131 (Post 11727442)

DUDE, just look at my last post and tell me which shooter you would bet $100 on.

I think you will choose shooter "b".

But notice that shooter "a" also shoots 20% from the field.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick3131 (Post 11727442)

before you refute this

take a look at this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

(I have to give RichC credit for pointing it out)

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons (Post 11727466)

DUDE, just look at my last post and tell me which shooter you would bet $100 on.

I think you will choose shooter "b".

But notice that shooter "a" also shoots 20% from the field.

that post is completely irrelevant.

Use the information given.

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons (Post 11727030)

here's a simpler way to solve this using programming

this is a code i wrote in mirc scripting to solve this problem

Code:

alias timmy {

  set %loop 0

  set %loop2 0

  set %chances 0

  :loop

  set %loop2 0

  if (%goals == 2) { inc %chances } 

  set %goals 0

  if (%loop >= 80000000) { goto end }

  :loop2

  inc %loop2

  if (%loop2 > 8) { goto loop }

  set %timmy $rand(1,5)

  if (%timmy == 1) { inc %goals }

  inc %loop

  goto loop2

  :end

  echo 4 %chances

}

well don't I just feel really dumb now??? Math was/hasn't ever been a forte of mine and now I know why I didn't do well. Thanks Nick! :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odie (Post 11727489)

well don't I just feel really dumb now??? Math was/hasn't ever been a forte of mine and now I know why I didn't do well. Thanks Nick! :P

You coming to vegas sweety?

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick3131 (Post 11727475)

that post is completely irrelevant.

Use the information given.

That post is the only one relevant to the actual odds.

I did use the info given and gave you a result.
I'm saying the result is BULLSHIT.

You have a formula but you are pluging in the wrong data so your results are meaningless.

I think you are afraid to actually read that post and add up the numbers.