![]() |
Quote:
I hosted I pleasant yound Muslim from Tehran over NYE - he had a wail of a time and he'll be working with me on a placement for the next 6 months. You wanna come over and chill? Quote:
|
Quote:
I couldn't let this idiot remark go unlaughed at. this will help you understand. read it so you don't look so foolish: http://www.parstimes.com/gov_iran.html Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (Chief of State) President Mahmoud Ahmadi-nejad (Head of State) here's the executive branch of the iranian government. oh look, one of those TV evangelists who's in no way Iran is actually Iran's leader.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
perfect example of why you feel the need to side with your kind. you can't even figure out what people are writing. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You quoted a half page of garbage when i said IRAN hasnt threatned anyone with nukes.. none of which made any threats with nukes you could easily prove me wrong my stating anywhere iran has made a threat to attack someone first with nukes ( that they dont even have ) dont try to dodge the obvious.. your a racist.. you cant answer any of the questions posed because your scared it will reveal the truth behind your opinions.. im still waiting for the question from page#2 ... remember musim = XX% jewish = XX% anytime your ready .. go ahead.. if you rman enough to hazard a guess .. |
Quote:
Again you prove you are a worthless opponent in a debate. |
Quote:
:thumbsup the hard part is fixing it.. we will work on that another day perhaps.. now lets get back to the question you have been dodging.. still waiting.. |
musim = 75% of muslims HATE JEWS
jewish = 50% of jews HATE MUSLIMS christian = 10% of christians hate MUSLIMS and JEWS gfy = 99.9% of GFY hates SmokeyTheBear |
Quote:
p.s. its 5 smiley faces that makes your point seem more valid not 4 you newb.. |
the reason there is going to have to be military action is exactly because of these types of discussions. irrational debate about everything except the issues that are relevant. "right", "wrong", death tolls, history etc have nothing to do with a country swearing to destroy you, withdrawing fully from any diplomatic efforts, defying the UN and continuing to make threats.
thats all that matters. 2000 years of history has nothing to do with a group of lunatics threatening to destroy a country and claiming its their lifes mission. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
dumbass |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In your reply, you named the one people (the Jews) as educated and lovely people, and the other (thus inferred as the Muslims) as uneducated who want to kill everyone. Then you state that you only wish death and destruction on the uneducated that wish to kill the rest of us. ergo death and destruction to all Muslims. Thanks for playing, but I'm quite capable of reading. |
Quote:
Only because there is no such thing as "a race' - it was just a terminology started by 'racist' Spaniards. But it kinda nicely clicked to group people of different cultures and ethnicit by racist Europeans and then more worldwide |
Quote:
|
for the ignorant
---------------------------- rac·ism (rā'sĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key n. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. race /reɪs/ Pronunciation Key - a group of persons related by common descent or heredity. any group, class, or kind, esp. of persons: Journalists are an interesting race. |
Quote:
Main Entry: race Function: noun Etymology: Middle French, generation, from Old Italian razza 1 : a breeding stock of animals 2 a : a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b : a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics <the English race> 3 a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species; also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies) representing such a group b : BREED c : a category of humankind that shares certain distinctive physical traits 4 obsolete : inherited temperament or disposition 5 : distinctive flavor, taste, or strength STFU nowhere in there does it state religion |
Quote:
http://www.answers.com/sect&r=67 |
Quote:
tell me you arent this stupid .. read what you just posted , pay close attention to definition 2a then come back and say " im sorry i didnt pay attention " or " i dont understad big words like "shared interests" or "characteristics" " :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
you said Originally Posted by 12clicks One people (the jews) are well educated and want to live in peace and another is basically uneducated and wants to kill everyone who doesn't agree with them. dictionary says a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others is there any question ? i'm not sure why at this point your even denying it.. they ( dictionary.com ) could have used your exact words and done a pretty good job :) |
Quote:
http://www.a-human-right.com/stopKKK_s.jpg |
Quote:
dear halfwit, I'm not jewish. now hurry up and jump to your next idiot point.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
it doesn't here.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
a group of persons related by common descent or heredity. any group, class, or kind, esp. of persons: Journalists are an interesting race. just admit you were mistaken , eat a little crow and move on , being stubborn just makes you look silly.. the key here wasnt about muslims , infact in the one quote he just said "other people" not muslims, he believes jews are educated and smart , and the others whomever they may be are uneducated killers.. that IS the textbook description of racism , not sure how more clear you could get.. the argument about wording is really semantics.. even if you dont believe its racist by your definition its somethingist :) lol |
Quote:
I do love though, how the defeated cower to childish name calling to try to pump up their machoism. Doesn't work, Mr. Racist. |
Quote:
i'm not gonna continue if your not even gonna read what was written. Just getting people to fucking read a dictionary is a hassle these days :winkwink: |
Quote:
Silly me. Enough of this already. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
in 81 israel bombed iraq, taking out a nuclear reactor sold by the french to saddam. israel bought the f-16s from usa but the f-16s were built for iran and we backed out cause of the iran hostage deal. we offered them to israel. israel had planned the iraq bombing for 2-3 years and there was no leak. anyone who says "israel plans nuke attack on iran" is probably 1/2 way right, but they likely didnt hear it from israel. also. it didnt require a 'nuke' to take out the iraq reactor and likely would not for the iran nuke program. they may be talking of using "depleted uranium" used in "bunker busters" Quote:
is an international treaty, opened for signature on July 1, 1968 to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. There are 188 sovereign states party to the treaty. However, two (India and Pakistan) out of eight confirmed nuclear powers (i.e., those who have openly tested nuclear weapons), and one unconfirmed nuclear power (Israel) neither signed nor ratified the treaty. One further nuclear power (North Korea) ratified the treaty and then later withdrew. The treaty was proposed by Ireland, and Finland was the first to sign. In New York City, on May 11, 1995, the parties to the treaty decided by consensus to extend the treaty indefinitely and without conditions. |
150 blind sheep
|
Quote:
here's a clue, halfwit, there's no such thing as the "muslim race" regardless of how much you wish it. now go jerk yourself off to your next dictionary interpretation.........usually.:1orglaugh |
me 3 this is getting boring my only point to this thread was more of a global concern over launching nukes not the invasion of iran..and its ethical and moral dilema's
The president of iran seems a tad off his rocker.. if they are making nukes they need to be stopped , but along with the power of making sure that takes place HAS to be the destruction of ones own nukes.. and are they relly making nukes.. they couldnt even fnd some fake evidence in iraq.. zip zero nada, they could have sent one sharpshooter to iraq accomplished the sme thing for trillions less $$ and alot less dead people |
Quote:
12 clicks right .. dictionary wrong.. i bet the muslims were behind it , they prob planted that on dictionary.com to make you look foolish.. hey look they planted it in the dictionary i have at home too those sneaky bastards .. maybe i should be on your side.. those sneaky bastard snuck in and changed a 20 year old oxford dictionary right under my nose..:winkwink: |
Quote:
|
I say let 'em fight it out. Sometimes, a nuclear attack is the only answer.
|
Quote:
|
Nukes are so gay..
|
Nukes are so gay..
http://www.evangelicalright.com/fris...n_moveon_2.jpg |
lol I understand the country needs to be stopped but what is wrong with using non-nuclear weapons? When people use nuclear weapons there is a lasting effect and also spreads panic of a full blown nuclear war. What is wrong with normal bunker buster bombs? I am sure they would do the trick you would possibly need more bombs but fuck nuking to stop nukes? does not make sense to me really. I ain't hating on them because they are jews but fuck they do bring up about the holocaust and now they want to start a nuclear holocaust? I watched a program about a famous "whisteblower" a while back http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu basicly he told the world about Israel having an illegal nuclear weapons program and was jailed for telling the world. So Israel broke international laws prohibiting countrys from having these weapons and now they take it upon themselves to make sure Iran does not have them. This one rule for Israel and another for the rest seems to pop up time after time.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123