![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
.XXX On Yahoo...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070106/...et_pornography
Looks like the word is getting itself back out there again. ![]() "The use of the proposed ".xxx" domain name would remain voluntary, but any porn sites that choose to use it instead of the more popular ".com" would be subject to the new terms issued late Friday by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers." When will it end!? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,529
|
What terms are they talking about?
__________________
264-543-302 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
NEW YORK - The Internet's key oversight agency has revived a proposal it earlier rejected to create an online red-light district, after adding stronger provisions to prohibit child pornography and require labeling of Web sites with sexually explicit materials.
The use of the proposed ".xxx" domain name would remain voluntary, but any porn sites that choose to use it instead of the more popular ".com" would be subject to the new terms issued late Friday by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. The idea of a separate ".xxx" domain has generated significant opposition from conservative groups and even some pornography Web sites. But ICANN officials said they initially rejected the proposal in May not because of the opposition but because of concerns that the agency might be put in a difficult position of having to enforce all of the world's laws governing pornography. They noted that various nations' speech-related laws sometimes conflict with one another. The new proposal does not directly address any potential conflicts in laws, but it calls for the company backing it, ICM Registry Inc. of Jupiter, Fla., to hire independent organizations to monitor porn sites' compliance with the new rules. ICANN, the agency in Marina del Rey, Calif., designated by the U.S. government to oversee domain name policies, opened the proposal to public comment but did not indicate when it would rule. If approved, ICM would be required to help develop mechanisms for promoting child safety and preventing child pornography, "including practices that appeal to pedophiles or suggest the presence of child pornography on the site." Porn sites would have to participate in a self-descriptive labeling system, likely one from the Internet Content Rating Association. Under it, Web sites add tags based on such criteria as the presence of nudity and whether it is in an artistic or educational context, such as for sites on breast feeding. Relatively few sites now participate, although major Web browsers have mechanisms for reading the tags. ICM also would have to develop automated tools to check for compliance and give users ways to report violations. ICM believes the domain would help the $12 billion online porn industry clean up its act, as those using it must abide by rules designed to bar such trickery as spamming and malicious scripts. Anti-porn advocates, however, countered that sites would be free to keep their current ".com" address, in effect making porn more easily accessible by creating yet another channel to house it. Many porn sites also objected, fearing that an ".xxx' domain would pave the way for governments or even private industry to filter speech that is protected in the United States by the First Amendment. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/693350-wtf-xxx-kicking-time-post-icann.html
already 79 replies here
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
|
Quote:
thread about .xxx in case you missed it ![]()
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,029
|
clean up its act lol
__________________
ARE YOU A FAMILY MEMBER? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |