Who says cheap porn sites do not work?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Theo The Theologian
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2005
    • 1099

    #211
    This thread is hysterical and I can't get enough but we all kind of glazed over something and it's been bothering me. Paul's Mysterious Magical Join links aside, just who the fuck said these sites don't work? I've never heard anyone say this.

    Paul please tell me where I can find this heated debate as I'd like to partake in some heated debateness.

    PS you are dumb.


    I'm a hate-fuelled umbrella-wielding photographer with a winning smile, and a way with the ladies.

    Comment

    • edgeprod
      Permanently Gone
      • Mar 2004
      • 10019

      #212
      Originally posted by Theo The Theologian
      This thread is hysterical and I can't get enough but we all kind of glazed over something and it's been bothering me. Paul's Mysterious Magical Join links aside, just who the fuck said these sites don't work? I've never heard anyone say this.

      Paul please tell me where I can find this heated debate as I'd like to partake in some heated debateness.

      PS you are dumb.
      He'll probably think you mean "who said HIS sites don't work" instead of "who said CHEAP porn sites don't work?"

      In the 90's, and even into more recent times, SexKey has generated some pretty hefty income for me, all from GIVING AWAY a password. You'd have to be a CLOWN not to be able to "sell" cheap/free.

      Comment

      • edgeprod
        Permanently Gone
        • Mar 2004
        • 10019

        #213
        Originally posted by Pleasurepays
        AND... he has the red ford escort wagon to prove it!
        Stop, you're making me jealous!

        Comment

        • edgeprod
          Permanently Gone
          • Mar 2004
          • 10019

          #214
          Haha, just logged into ICQ to find some love sent by fans of this thread:

          hey just wanted to thank you for the laughs lol, your a fucking funny fucker and really been enjoying your humour
          And then, of course, Stu, who tossed me a year's membership to both of his awesome sites.

          Thanks for the love, everyone, haha .. let's keep the show rolling .. few things could be funnier.

          Comment

          • StuBradley
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2002
            • 2625

            #215
            Originally posted by edgeprod
            And then, of course, Stu, who tossed me a year's membership to both of his awesome sites.

            Thanks for the love, everyone, haha .. let's keep the show rolling .. few things could be funnier.
            You're welcome edge Yes, this is the funniest thread in a loooong time.

            51-566-514

            Comment

            • StuBradley
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2002
              • 2625

              #216
              Originally posted by Theo The Theologian
              Paul please tell me where I can find this heated debate as I'd like to partake in some heated debateness.

              PS you are dumb.
              Theo, you're too much.

              51-566-514

              Comment

              • edgeprod
                Permanently Gone
                • Mar 2004
                • 10019

                #217
                Originally posted by StuBradley
                Theo, you're too much.
                ... in bed!

                Comment

                • Pleasurepays
                  BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 11913

                  #218
                  what a MIRTHTASTIC thread!

                  Comment

                  • edgeprod
                    Permanently Gone
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 10019

                    #219
                    Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                    what a MIRTHTASTIC thread!


                    She bangs!

                    Where is Paul with the "thanks for the bump" bullshit?

                    Comment

                    • edgeprod
                      Permanently Gone
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 10019

                      #220
                      Originally posted by StuBradley
                      Probably chatting with 14 year olds on his forum. Can you believe this...
                      Holy shit ... whoever runs that forum is opening themselves to quite a bit of liability by letting CHILDREN as young as 13 to register and view explicit images. Of course, they'd be in a LOT more trouble if he were in the U.S.

                      It's almost unreal .. seeing that big of a fuckup! Dunno who runs it, but hope no one reports it if it's an "honest" mistake!

                      Comment

                      • Rui
                        web
                        • Dec 2001
                        • 9533

                        #221
                        anybody willing to do a cliff notes on the PM-drama?

                        Comment

                        • edgeprod
                          Permanently Gone
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 10019

                          #222
                          Originally posted by Rui
                          anybody willing to do a cliff notes on the PM-drama?
                          1) Lies.

                          2) Caught in a lie.

                          3) Laughing, various forms of mirth ensue.

                          4) Lies to cover the lie.

                          5) Much additional laughing.

                          6) Threads, here and on another board, either lying about the original thread, or making up an email from a "surfer."

                          7) More laughing, some "thanks for the bumps," and "even though I have to shoot content to eat, I'm so rich and make more than you" amusement.

                          8) Laughing continues. Present day.

                          Comment

                          • Jack_Daniels
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 161

                            #223
                            I don't have a dog in this fight and I've gotta admit I've laughed my way through most of this thread too.

                            However on another level, it is kinda sad to witness (in slow-motion no less) the virtual death of yet another longtime (albeit oftentimes annoying) GFYer.

                            This is certainly a rough playground to be for sure
                            My signature is almost invisible.

                            Comment

                            • edgeprod
                              Permanently Gone
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 10019

                              #224
                              Originally posted by Jack_Daniels
                              I don't have a dog in this fight and I've gotta admit I've laughed my way through most of this thread too.

                              However on another level, it is kinda sad to witness (in slow-motion no less) the virtual death of yet another longtime (albeit oftentimes annoying) GFYer.

                              This is certainly a rough playground to be for sure
                              Basically, if you come here trying to bullshit, and someone calls you on it, this just shows that the right response is not to try to lie and/or spin your way out.

                              Comment

                              • edgeprod
                                Permanently Gone
                                • Mar 2004
                                • 10019

                                #225
                                Originally posted by baddog
                                Pretty dumb for risking a ban
                                Hm? Do you mean STU is risking a ban? I think what he posted was factual -- in that the forum in question allows people age 13 and older to register, despite the fact that it's got "porn" in the name, and has adult images.

                                If you meant something else, sorry.

                                If you meant what I thought you meant, where do you think he ran afoul of that rule? I read what he said as, "you let kids onto your forum," not that he (or anyone) was somehow stimulated by that, which violates the rule.

                                Am I way off base here?

                                Comment

                                Working...